Theories of Immanuel Wallerstein and Frantz Fanon and the Social Issue of Homelessness
For the final product of this assignment, you will end up writing a theory paper on Homelessness as a Social Issue applying two contemporary theories.
Think of a question, a significant one that gives you a research question that puzzles our society that may be related to this topic? Your goal in this paper is to use two of our theories to help us explain one or two answers to this question.
The assignment requires no use of outside sources on empirical case studies, you should use material from the text *social theory re-wired 2nd edition, though additional theoretical reading is encouraged. Your goal is to have a theory paper. To that end, you state one or two possible answers to this question, and then “test” how one or two of our social theorists guide you to your topic statement about that puzzle (admittedly, this is just a hypothesis). The first page of your paper should allude to a topic, a puzzle, and one or two answers—a topic statement. The bulk of your paper should go on to explain how one or two theorists help one come to one or two answers to this puzzle. Throughout your paper, you should theorize the explanation to your puzzle by referring to the theorists and the text we have read, and perhaps secondary theoretical sources posted on the book or suggested by the instructor during early parts of this assignment.
Requirements:
Part 1, analyzing your puzzle from the perspective of ONE contemporary theory/ist from this list:
Immanuel Wallerstein- “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capital System”
Pierre Bourdieu – “The Forms of Capital”
Manuel Castells- “Materials for an Exploratory Theory of the Network Society”
Herbert Marcuse- “One- Dimensional Man”
Michel Foucault – “Discipline and Punish”
Zygmunt Bauman- “Modernity and the Holocaust”
The goal is to demonstrate how your case supports or challenges a contemporary social theory.
Part 2, analyze ONE more contemporary theory/ist from this list:
Erving Goffman-“The Presentation of self in Everyday life”
Anthony Giddens “Modernity and Self Identity”
Michael Omi and Howard Winant “Racial Formation in the United States”
Frantz Fanon “Black Skin, White Masks”
Dorothy Smith “The Conceptual Practices of Power”
Patricia Hill Collins-“Black feminist Thought”
Again, the goal is to demonstrate how your case supports and expands, or challenges and revises that theory, though this time also comparing and contrasting the two theories.
Guidelines for all writing assignments: Assignment should be typed; in Times New Roman 12 pt font with 1” margins double-spaced; the assignment name, and page numbers.
∞ ensure that the introduction and conclusion belong to the same paper and make the same point (sometimes our intentions drift as we get writing),
∞ and make sure each part of the essay makes sense and contributes to the whole.
You must cite any sources you consult, and properly quote anything you use in your essay. These citations should be formatted according to ASA, APA, or Chicago style requirements.
Homelessness as A Social Issue
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Homelessness as A Social Issue
Introduction
Homelessness is a complex social issue deeply rooted in structural inequalities and systems of power. This paper aims to use the theories of Immanuel Wallerstein and Frantz Fanon to explain how economic and racial factors contribute to the persistence of homelessness and how these factors shape the experiences of marginalized individuals (Wallerstein, 1974; Fanon, 2017). Through analyzing these theories, the paper will demonstrate how they support or challenge the understanding of homelessness as a social issue and how they intersect and compare with one another in their explanations. The paper will also explore how these theories can inform potential solutions to address homelessness.
Part 1
In this theory paper, I will examine the social issue of homelessness by utilizing Immanuel Wallerstein’s “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capital System” as a lens. The research question addresses how social structures and systems perpetuate homelessness and how these factors intersect with issues of race and identity. The topic statement asserts that homelessness is a complex issue rooted in structural inequalities and systems of power (Longhofer & Winchester, 2016). By analyzing Wallerstein’s theory, the paper delves into how economic factors contribute to the persistence of homelessness and how they shape the experiences of marginalized individuals.
Wallerstein’s theory of world systems analysis argues that the global economy is divided into core, semi-periphery, and periphery nations, with the core nations exploiting the resources and labor of the periphery nations. Longhofer and Winchester (2016) assert that this exploitation leads to a widening gap between the wealthy and the poor within and between nations. In the context of homelessness, this theory suggests that the structural inequalities in the global economy contributed to the marginalization and poverty of specific individuals and communities, making them more vulnerable to homelessness (Wallerstein, 1974). One of the key ways in which these structural inequalities manifest is through the lack of affordable housing. The core nations, with greater access to resources and wealth, can invest in and maintain housing options that are out of reach for those in the periphery. Besides, this creates a situation where there is a shortage of affordable housing options, particularly in urban areas where jobs and economic opportunities are concentrated.
As a result, individuals and families living in poverty cannot access adequate housing and are at a greater risk of becoming homeless. Furthermore, the global economy’s focus on profit and growth also leads to the displacement of communities, particularly those that are marginalized and low-income (Longhofer & Winchester, 2016). Besides, this can take the form of urban renewal projects, gentrification, and other forms of land development that prioritize the interests of the wealthy over those of marginalized communities. Accordingly, this displacement can lead to the loss of social networks and support systems, making it even more difficult for affected individuals and families to access housing and other resources.
Immanuel Wallerstein’s theory of world systems analysis posits that the exploitation of periphery nations by core nations leads to a widening gap between the wealthy and the poor, both within and between nations (Wallerstein, 1974). Besides, this exploitation also highlights how it contributes to the racialization of poverty and homelessness. The racial and ethnic makeup of homeless people often reflects the racial and ethnic disparities in the global economy (Longhofer & Winchester, 2016). For instance, African Americans and other people of color are disproportionately represented among the homeless population in the United States. Accordingly, this reflects the systemic racism and discrimination that have historically limited their access to economic opportunities and resources.
In conclusion, Immanuel Wallerstein’s theory of world-systems analysis offers a valuable perspective on the social issue of homelessness. It illustrates how structural inequalities in the global economy perpetuate homelessness, particularly among marginalized groups. This theory also highlights how economic factors intersect with issues of race and identity, as people of color are disproportionately represented among the homeless population. By understanding the role of these structural inequalities in homelessness, more effective and equitable solutions can be developed to address this critical social issue. It is important to note that this theory provides a framework for understanding the issue, but it is not an all-encompassing explanation. It is essential to consider other factors that contribute to homelessness, such as mental health, addiction, and trauma.
Part 2
In this theory paper, the social issue of homelessness is examined through the lens of Frantz Fanon’s “Black Skin, White Masks.” The research question aims to understand how social structures and systems perpetuate homelessness and how these factors intersect with issues of race and identity. The topic statement asserts that homelessness is a complex issue deeply rooted in structural inequalities and systems of power. By analyzing Fanon’s theory, the paper delves into how racial factors contribute to the persistence of homelessness and shape the experiences of marginalized individuals (Fanon, 2017). It is important to note that Fanon’s theory provides a framework for understanding the issue, but it is not an all-encompassing explanation. It is essential to consider other factors that contribute to homelessness, such as mental health, addiction, and trauma.
Frantz Fanon’s theory in “Black Skin, White Masks” posits that the experience of racism creates feelings of alienation and a sense of not belonging. Racism forces individuals of color to adopt the dominant culture’s values and ways of being accepted, leading to feelings of inauthenticity and a loss of self. Concerning homelessness, this theory suggests that racism and discrimination can contribute to feelings of alienation and a sense of not belonging, making individuals more susceptible to homelessness (Fanon, 2017). The theory points to how racism is not only a social problem but also a personal one, and it impacts the individual’s mental health and self-esteem. It also highlights how racism is not only about individual prejudices but also structural inequalities that affect entire communities.
<...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
Haitian Cultural Communication Patterns
5 pages/≈1375 words | 6 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Term Paper |
-
Concepts of Homeland Security and Defense
5 pages/≈1375 words | 8 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Term Paper |
-
Inequality in Drug Treatment Resource Allocation
4 pages/≈1100 words | 4 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Term Paper |