Civil Rights and Civil Liberties

Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Final Paper
Student's Name
College/University
Course
Professor's Name
Due Date
The United States (U.S.) Constitution incorporates civil rights and civil liberties. Civil liberties augment natural rights delineated within the Declaration of Independence as follows: ''We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that their Creator endows them with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Civil liberties are typically protected from government influence and are depicted as rights and freedoms within the Bill of Rights as well as other constitutional amendments. Civil rights are freedoms and safeguards within the government's premise to promote and protect. They are derived from government actions such as laws passed via legislation. The exceptional threat to Americans' ways of life, thus, creates the need for restrictions on human rights and civil liberties. It is increasingly crucial to ensure that the safeguards from the capacity to exercise state power do not prevent the government's ability to respond to the threat more effectively. In order to meet today's challenges, the U.S. government must reform the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) around the mission that delineates services and safety alongside its conventional safeguard roles. Contemporary governance relies on such aspects as civil rights and civil liberties, the balance between security and civil liberties, the safeguards instilled to protect such rights, and the Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) capacity to address the emerging challenges while safeguarding civil liberties. This paper evaluates the above issues and argues that ensuring the appropriate balance between security and civil liberties is sophisticated but fundamental in protecting citizen freedoms and democratic principles.
Difference Between Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
The concepts of civil rights and civil liberties are instrumental in the perspective of government policy and constitutional law. Although these concepts are employed interchangeably at times, they depict different aspects of individual protections and freedoms in society. Civil rights entail a more comprehensive range of legal privileges and protections vital for fostering equal opportunities and treatment for all people. They significantly protect people against unfair treatment based on gender, national origin, race, and religion. Also, civil rights curb inherent discriminatory practices such as inequitable access to education, employment, public accommodation, and housing. Such laws aim at enhancing equality and fostering fairness for all citizens. Arguably, civil rights trace their origin back to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which sought to eliminate racial discrimination and public segregation (Dobbin & Kalev, 2021). Amid this backdrop, it can be deduced that civil rights have become increasingly vital in addressing structural inequalities that undermine the principles of equality and justice in America.
As opposed to civil rights, civil liberties entail fundamental freedoms and rights that protect citizens from state interference and intrusion to their privacy. They involve an array of rights as the constitution provides, which give the citizens freedom. They also protect citizens from unwarranted seizures and searches, cruel and unworthy punishment, and self-incrimination. Unlike civil rights, which aim to foster equality and fairness, civil liberties focus on restraining the government's power and safeguarding citizen autonomy (Zick, 2019). Such documents as the Bill of Rights found in the U.S. Constitution offer the basis of civil liberties and act as the bulwark against any possible government abuses. Therefore, civil liberties are important in ensuring respect for constitutional amendments and safeguards in contemporary America.
One fundamental distinction between civil liberties and civil rights is evident in their orientation. Arguably, civil rights are proactive measures that seek to correct historical and ongoing disparities. They focus on addressing societal inequalities and enhancing inclusivity by introducing affirmative obligations on private and government organizations (Dobbin & Kalev, 2021). In contrast, civil liberties are naturally defensive, shielding citizens from state or government overreach (Zick, 2019). They significantly restrain government actions, ensuring that the state respects the inherent rights of the people and does not infringe upon them. Such crucial distinction in orientation demonstrates these twos’ complementary yet different roles in fostering a free and just society.
Another fundamental distinction between civil rights and civil liberties lies in their emphasis on various factors of individual freedom. Civil rights focus on ensuring everyone receives equal opportunities and treatment regardless of race or background. They play an integral role in addressing systemic disparities and enhancing social justice. For example, affirmative action initiatives seek to redress historical discrimination by ensuring minorities have equal access to employment opportunities and education (Dobbin & Kalev, 2021). On the other hand, civil liberties focus on protecting citizens' autonomy and privacy. They play an integral role in mitigating government overreach and maintaining a balance and checks system that ensures citizens do not suffer arbitrary state actions (Zick, 2019).
In summary, civil rights and civil liberties differ in various aspects yet are interrelated concepts that play significant roles in fostering a free and just society. Whereas civil rights seek to promote equality and eliminate historical disparities, civil liberties restrain government power and safeguard individual freedoms. It is vital to comprehend such differences to protect the standards and principles of justice and democracy, which form the foundation of most modern societies. Both civil rights and civil liberties are the fundamental foundations of a democratic state or organization, working jointly to ensure an equitable and fair environment for all people while protecting their rights and liberties.
Challenges of Balancing Civil Liberties and Security
The balance between civil liberties and security is a fundamental subject that democratic societies have largely debated and contented. The protection of the citizen's rights and freedom largely relies on enhancing civil liberties; thus, security is paramount in protecting the safety and well-being of society. The potential for state overstretch and power abuse is a significant challenge to balancing civil liberties and security. Governments incorporate various measures disguised as security, such as data collection, surveillance initiatives, and counterterrorism policies, which can violate citizens' privacy rights. The expansion of the above security measures in the digital era, sometimes disguised as national security, trigger questions about eradicating civil liberties. For instance, Edward Snowden revealed that intelligence agencies conducted mass surveillance, which started a global debate concerning the trade-off between individual privacy and security (Ogasawara, 2022). Ensuring the right balance needs strict oversight, comprehensive legal frameworks, and checks and balances to ensure the government does not abuse power and safeguard civil liberties.
The tension between civil liberties and security intensifies during emergencies and crises. The government always employs stringent measures to foster the security and safety of their citizens when facing such threats as public health crises or terrorism. However, such efforts can result in the temporary eradication of civil liberties. For example, the USA Patriot Act, enacted after the September 11, 2001 attacks, expanded the government's surveillance powers and triggered questions on due process and citizen's privacy rights (Eck & Hatz, 2020). It is particularly challenging to balance abovementioned situations, considering that governments should feel the urgency of the threat and the possible long-term eradication of civil liberties.
Another challenge of balancing civil liberties and security is the different views of security among people and across societies. What one individual views as a fundamental security measure, another may perceive as an unwarranted invasion of their privacy and civil liberties. Such variance in views and opinions presents a significant challenge in attaining a consensus on a suitable balance. The perceived privacy risk adversely affects the perceived security of specific measures such as mobile apps (Balapour et al., 2020). Also, historical experiences, political ideologies, and cultural backgrounds can affect how people and societies view the trade-off between security and civil liberties. Balancing such differences and establishing common ground is a significant challenge in democratic institutions with pluralism and diversity.
The instrumental role that the judiciary plays in fostering civil liberties while promoting security is another aspect of this sophisticated issue. Courts of law significantly contribute to interpreting and ascertaining whether government actions and policies adhere to the constitution and provisions of the law. However, there is a need to intricately weigh personal rights against the state's interest in security (Gorodovenko et al., 2021). Ensuring this balance needs a vigilant and independent judiciary that can check legislative and executive overreach. Judicial decisions, such as those on the legality of surveillance initiatives or warrantless searches, sometimes set precedents that affect the continued tension between security and civil liberties.
Thus, balancing civil liberties and security is a sophisticated and continued challenge in most democratic societies. Government-driven overreach and intrusion, response to crisis, varying views and opinions, and the integral role of the judiciary all play a significant role in this problem's complexities. Deciding on the proper equilibrium needs continued vigilance, the general public discourse, and observing the rule of law and principles of democracy. Although it is evident that security is vital for society's well-being, there is no need to acquire it at the expense of essential civil liberties, and ensuring such balance remains a crucial task...