100% (1)
page:
7 pages/≈1925 words
Sources:
4
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 30.24
Topic:

Exagerated White Supremacist View of the YouTuber PewDiePie

Research Paper Instructions:

Why Am I Being Asked to Write an Investigative Report?

You may not plan on becoming a journalist; however, you are likely curious about the things that matter to you and probably recognize the value in credible information. Whether you’re trying to figure out which car to buy, which major to choose, or how to make sense of the news, you are investigating evidence. Distinguishing between facts and opinions is a crucial skill in college—and more importantly—beyond it. Our class activities and your experience reporting on an issue you are curious about will help nurture your research, analysis, and writing skills.



Overview

For this assignment, you will be writing an investigative report of a current event. An investigative report involves research and a report “serves to highlight the author’s expertise with the purpose of informing or educating an audience” (Glenn 112). You will choose a current event that interests you and which is receiving wide media coverage. You’ll then collect a variety of texts that cover the event (e.g., article, editorial, blog post, pundit's monologue, think tank essay, analysis, etc.). Next, you will evaluate the merits, credentials, biases, strengths and failings of each, paying special attention to the rhetorical situation in which each piece is operating. Finally, you will write a report which clarifies 1) how biases, reporting, reasoning, genres, and especially the rhetorical situations surrounding these texts impact the ways in which the event has been portrayed, and 2) what the implications of these observations suggest for your future investigations of evidence.



Your Investigative Report should be:

1,500 words + rhetorical notes + research notes

Tailored to a specific audience (e.g., not simply “multimodal” but “tech blog readers”)

Formatted appropriately to the corresponding audience and medium

Using citation, including in-text and a Works Cited page, regardless of audience/medium

Steps for conducting an investigative report:

Search for and select a current event that interests you. A current event is an event that has received significant media coverage in the past twelve months and is of interest to your audience.

Choose an audience you want to communicate with about this event.

College (e.g., a professor, USU administration, a club, class peers, The Statesman readers…)

Community (e.g., City Council, religious/political organization, The Herald Journal readers…)

Workplace (e.g., your boss, your co-workers, corporate CEO, clients or patrons…)

Multimodal (e.g., specific blog readers, The New Yorker readers, YouTube subscribers…)

Gather 4 texts from 4 different genres that address this event, such as YouTube videos, tweets, social media posts, news articles, books (or a book review), or a website.

Create a graphic organizer to help you make sense of these various texts. Your graphic organizer lists each source on the left and then pulls out important pieces in columns to the right of the source to help you see similarities and differences across the texts. Identify and extract the following elements from each source: a) the author/creator’s intended audience, b) evidence, b) facts, c) beliefs, d) opinions, e) assumptions, f) biases, and g) the rhetorical strategies (logos/pathos/ethos) used by the author.

Collaborate with a peer in an in-class discussion of your graphic organizer.

Let your thoughts and ideas stew for a while. Talk about it with people you value. Re-read and take notes on your organizer. Take stabs at identifying patterns across the categories.

List some of the patterns you are seeing across the columns, as well as any potential relationships between the patterns you are noting. What are you discovering?

Now, to help you visualize the context of this rhetorical situation in which you are writing, draw a picture of it.

Who’s in the picture (yourself, your audience—but how should they be drawn to represent their view of the current event you’re investigating)?

Are there other people in the picture (e.g., your teacher? The people at issue in your current event?)

What obstacles do YOU face as a writer trying to communicate your findings to THE AUDIENCE you selected? Can you express these obstacles visually?

What is your goal in writing to them? Can you draw it?

Finally, what rhetorical strategies should you utilize to accomplish this goal? Will you tap into logic? Emotion? Your own credibility? What format will be most effective? And how will you use these elements to accomplish your goal?

Draw some conclusions about how the elements you analyzed impacted the way this current event has been presented in public discourse. You might choose to focus on one element, or you might choose to discuss them all.

Using all of these resources together (the sources, your research work and notes, your awareness of the rhetorical situation, your goals and strategies), outline and/or draft your report. Using what you’ve found, read, and analyzed, explain to your reader the following:

The Facts

The basic facts of the event that are most likely true

Any aspects of the event that are probably true but whose verity is questionable

Anything that has been reported that is certainly not true

The Opinions

The major opinions and interpretations of the meaning or importance of the event

The quality of the reasoning supporting those various interpretations

The Conclusions

How biases, reporting, reasoning, genres, and especially the rhetorical situations surrounding these texts impact the ways in which the event has been portrayed

What the implications of these observations suggest for your future investigations of evidence.

Write your Rhetorical Notes (1-2 double-spaced pages)

What was your purpose in writing your investigative report?

Which audience did you choose? Why did you choose this audience?

How did the audience influence your writing voice? Your content? Your formatting?

What roles did ethos, pathos, and logos play in your evaluation?

Given what you’ve stated above, how effectively do you think you accomplished your purpose?

Although you will turn in your Rhetorical Notes with the Investigative Report, the Rhetorical Notes do not count toward the word count for your evaluation.

Write your Research Notes (1-2 double-spaced pages):

How did this assignment help you understand the value and characteristics of evidence?

What information did you find that was relevant to your audience and purpose?

What challenges did you have while doing your research?

What strategies did you use in your research? How well did they work?

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:
Your Name
Subject and Section
Professor’s Name
Date
Exagerated White Supremacist View of the YouTuber PewDiePie
YouTube is a fast growing platform where content creators upload multiple videos that can be monetized by YouTube depending on the number of subscribers and watch time. According to the YouTube policy 2018, for a video to be monetized, a content creator must have a YouTube channel that gathered at least 1000 subscribers and at least 4000 video views. YouTube channels can be owned by an individual content creator, commonly referred to as YouTubers, or even by a massive corporate entity. One individual content creator, which is currently the most popular individual creator and 2nd most subscribed channel in YouTube, is owned by a Swedish YouTuber based on UK named Felix Arvid Ulf Kjellberg or also known as PewDiePie. PewDiePie have a subscriber count of above 94 million and a total of at least 21 billion video views that secured a considerable amount of profit, prestige and influence in the YouTube community. However, his popularity won’t go untouched by controversies, especially by biased media institutions and defamatory opinions that made false accusations, which damaged his general image and had significant negative effect on the total outlook of YouTube subscribers about his content. For the last few months, PewDiePie had been slandered to be a racist, anti-Semitic (discriminative against Jews), and a terrorist. Although, there are instances that PewDiePie had blatantly made racist and anti-Semitic comments, the media is keep on taking his comments out of context and deliberately brand him as a YouTuber that supports racist, pro-Nazi and terroristic content. The purpose of this paper is to clear out facts and present out inaccurate and biased media reports that lead PewDiePie to be viewed as a hated YouTuber because of comments that were taken out of context by his critics. I hope that with the information presented in this paper show how information can be easily changed and increase the occurrences of fake news that contribute to a completely fabricated content; and, also, to uphold the principle standard of journalism which is to adhere to the integrity, truthfulness, objectivity and public accountability to news reporting as applications of worthy information that will be delivered to the public.
On April 9, 2019, Maria Ruiz posted petition on change.org to entitled “Remove White Supremacist Content from YouTube.” This petition stated the removal of PewDiePie's channel as it promotes white supremacist views in his video contents. Maria Ruiz claimed that PewDiePie use the defamatory language "the N-word” twice in his videos and paid people to say the “n-word”; Promoted videos that contain Adolf Hilter speeches and Anti-Semitic cartoons; paid Indian men to hold up signs that say death to all Jews using Fiverr; and, Performed the Nazi hail in one of his videos. Maria Ruiz's Petition gathered at least 90, 000 signatures to support the removal of PewDiePie (Ruiz).
PewDiePie responded with these allegations by stating the truth about Ruiz's claims. PewDIePie pointed out that Ruiz made a petition to remove "white supremacist on YouTube;" however, PewDiePie pointed out that the petition was titled "Remove white supremacist on YouTube," but the content was actually to ban PewDiePie which outright misinform the people. Ruiz's petition linked videos to support her claims; however, these claims were taken out of context and lead to damage the reputation of PewDiePie.
First, is the claim where PewdiePie allegedly used the "N-word" twice and paid people to say the “N-word.” There is truth in PewDiePie making using in one video but not more than that (PewDiePie). That lead PewDiePie become banned in live-streaming videos in YouTube; but, people keep on insisting that PewDiepie keeps using the "N-word" in his other videos and paying other people to say the n-word, such as the one that Ruiz pointed out (Ruiz). In the video where Ruiz pointed out the other instances that Pewdiepie used the "N-word," PewDiePie was talking in his native tongue, Swedish, where the words sounded like PewDiePie was using the N-word where Ruiz said that PewDiePie is using the Swedish version of the "N-word." However, there is no such thing as a Swedish version of the "n-word," and Ruiz made a deliberate attempt to exaggerate the racist claims about PewDiePie. Also, there are no video’s or any supporting evidences that PewDiePie paid people to say the N-word as Ruiz made no links to support her claim.
Second, PewDiePie made videos with Adolf Hilter speeches and Anti-Semitic cartoons. Ruiz linked a video containing another issue and do not have any evidence that PewDiePie used any Adolf Hitler speeches and Anti-Semitic cartoons. The verge and the Vox made additional articles in their websites, talking about one PewDiePie video where PewDiePie made a shout-out to other YouTube channels. The verge and the Vox claimed that PewDiePie supports anti-Semitic content since one of the channels he recommended has another channel that often includes sexist and anti-Semitic content (Alexander; Romano). However, the channel that PewDiePie recommended was actually talking about anime and no sexist and anti-Semitic in the video. PewDiePie stated that the he did not know that the channel he recommended have another channel that have sexist and anti-Semitic content which lead to making, The verge and the Vox online news source to remove the context in their report and claim that PewDiePie promotes sexist and anti-Semitic content(Alexander; Romano). This occurrences led people in other social media, such as twitter, cites to cla...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!