Food Waste Problem. Social Sciences Research Essay Paper

Research Paper Instructions:

1. Review the grading rubric as listed on this page.

2. Choose any topic that can be debated (with the exception of the following: marijuana, abortion, and smoking). Do not repeat old arguments, provide a new perspective.

3. Review the Argument Essay Outline you submitted along with feedback you received from that assignment. Make adjustments to the outline in accordance with the feedback. This may include strengthening lines of reasoning, expanding or improving research sources for supporting evidence, creating a more sympathetic introduction to your position, etc.

4. Develop a complete draft of your essay using your improved Argument Essay Outline. It should meet the following requirements. Papers submitted that do not meet the requirements will be returned to you ungraded.

o A two-part thesis including statement of position; and forecast of your lines of reasoning

o A minimum and maximum of three credible outside sources formatted on a source page (MLA, Works Cited)

o MLA formatting (see the MLA Format page as needed)

o Minimum and maximum of four (4) full pages, not including the Works Cited page (Your Works Cited page should be the fifth page).

o No block or long quotes; that is anything over three lines.

5. Submit your detailed outline only as a single file upload to the outline drop box.

Argumentative Essay (Draft) Assignment Instructions

For this assignment, you will work through the drafting stage of your writing process in an argument essay.

Assignment Instructions

Review the grading rubric as listed on this page.
Choose any topic that can be debated (with the exception of the following: marijuana, abortion, and smoking). Do not repeat old arguments, provide a new perspective.
Review the Argument Essay Outline you submitted along with feedback you received from that assignment. Make adjustments to the outline in accordance with the feedback. This may include strengthening lines of reasoning, expanding or improving research sources for supporting evidence, creating a more sympathetic introduction to your position, etc.
Develop a complete draft of your essay using your improved Argument Essay Outline. It should meet the following requirements. Papers submitted that do not meet the requirements will be returned to you ungraded.

A two-part thesis including statement of position; and forecast of your lines of reasoning
A minimum and maximum of three credible outside sources formatted on a source page (MLA, Works Cited)
MLA formatting (see the MLA Format page as needed)
Minimum and maximum of four (4) full pages, not including the Works Cited page (Your Works Cited page should be the fifth page).
No block or long quotes; that is anything over three lines.

Submit your detailed outline only as a single file upload to the outline drop box.

Requirements

Be sure to:
Choose a specific issue in which two credible parties have documented clearly opposing positions and clear agendas. (You get to choose any topic except the following: Marijuana, smoking, or abortion)
Choose the position you agree with and argue that position using the following:
- Three separate lines of reasoning;
- Each line of reasoning will support your position with research (example, testimony, and fact/data, or any combination) that supports your position; and
- Research about the opposing position’s views
- Present the opposing views and refute them.
- Do not repeat old arguments, provide a new prospective about your topic.
- Include a two-part thesis with:
  - Statement of position; and
  - Forecast of your lines of reasoning
  - Topics are not thesis statements. (You will need to narrow and define your argument).
  - Develop an enticing title that implies your position (A topic is not a quality title).
  - Use a sympathetic appeal and/or cited research in the introduction to establish the issue.
  - Avoid addressing the assignment directly. (Don’t write “I am going to argue about…” Instead, introduce the issue in a more compelling way that makes the reader care.)
  - Your voice should be professional and scholarly (Use formal language. No slang or contractions). Essay must be written in third person point of view.
  - Each paragraph should contain between six to eight sentences each.
  - Block/long quotes are not allowed – that is anything over three lines.
  - Minimum and maximum of three sources.
  - Package your source material with appropriate signaling and commentary.
  - All quotes/paraphrases must be introduced, stated, and then explained with two sentences.
  - The first time a source is used, you must introduce the source/author/material to the audience.
  - All outside sources must be properly documented in your essay using in-text citations.
  - MLA formatting (see the MLA Format page as needed).
  - Works Cited page is required and should be the last page of the essay (fifth page of essay). Must also be formatted correctly using MLA Format (Only sources listed in the essay can be listed on the Works Cited page).
  - Submitted as either a Microsoft Word doc, or rtf file with your first and last name in the file name.

Outline and Draft Rubrics are as follows:

Grading Rubric: Argument Essay—Outline

Criteria	Ratings	Point Total: 100
Ideas	15 pts: The paper demonstrates outstanding idea development. 12 pts: The paper demonstrates above average idea development. 11 pts: The writer sufficiently defines the topic, even though development is still basic or general. 9 pts: The paper has an idea that needs to be developed. 0 pts: There is no coherent idea.	25 pts
Content	15 pts: The paper demonstrates outstanding evidence of supporting the main point. 12 pts: The paper demonstrates above average evidence of supporting the main point. 11 pts: The paper demonstrates sufficient support of the main point. 9 pts: The paper requires more supporting evidence of the main point. 0 pts: There is little content supporting the main idea.	25 pts
Organization	15 pts: The organization is outstanding and showcases the central theme. The presentation of information is compelling. 13 pts: The organizational structure is above average. 10 pts: The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the text without too much confusion. 8 pts: The writing needs a clearer sense of direction. The internal structure is weak. 0 pts: The organization is poor.	25 pts
Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, Conventions	5 pts: The writer demonstrates an outstanding word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions. 3 pts: The writer demonstrates above average word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions. 2 pts: The writer demonstrates sufficient selection of words. The text tends to be more mechanical and contains some errors of standard writing conventions. 1 pts: The writer demonstrates a limited vocabulary and lack of fluidity. Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage and grammar repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read. 0 pts: No marks.	25 pts

Grading Rubric: Argument Essay—Draft

Criteria	Rating	Points 100
MLA Style	10 pts: Format (12-point font, Times New Roman, double-spaced, one-inch margins); Header (last name and page number in upper right-hand corner); Roman Numerals, letters, and numbers aligned as demonstrated in the sample sentence outline; Working title and thesis statement. Each line contains a sentence. 8 pts: Format contains most of the above requirements. 5 pts: Format contains some of the above requirements. 2 pts: Format contains very only a few of the above requirements. 0 pts: Format none of the above requirements	10 pts
Thesis	10 pts: Thesis is clear, lists the topic, author’s stance, and identifies the direction for the paper. Author’s stance is arguable and can be debated. 8 pts: Thesis partially meets the above requirements. 5 pts: Thesis somewhat meets the above requirements. 2 pts: Thesis is underdeveloped and/or lacks an argument. 0 pts: Thesis does not meet the above requirements or is nonexistent.	10 pts
Ideas	25 pts: The paper demonstrates outstanding idea development. 20 pts: The paper demonstrates above average idea development. 15 pts: The writer sufficiently defines the topic, even though development is still basic or general. 10 pts: The paper has an idea that needs to be developed. 0 pts: There is no coherent idea.	25 pts
Content	25 pts: The paper demonstrates outstanding evidence of supporting the main point. 20 pts: The paper demonstrates above average evidence of supporting the main point. 15 pts: The paper demonstrates sufficient support of the main point. 10 pts: The paper requires more supporting evidence of the main point. 0 pts: There is little content supporting the main idea.	25 pts
Organization	20 pts: The organization is outstanding and showcases the central theme. The presentation of information is compelling. 18 pts: The organizational structure is above average. 15 pts: The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the text without too much confusion. 10 pts: The writing needs a clearer sense of direction. The internal structure is weak. 0 pts: The organization is poor.	20 pts
Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, Conventions	10 pts: The writer demonstrates an outstanding word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions. 8 pts: The writer demonstrates above average word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions. 5 pts: The writer demonstrates sufficient selection of words. The text tends to be more mechanical and contains some errors of standard writing conventions. 3 pts: The writer demonstrates a limited vocabulary and lack of fluidity. Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage and grammar repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read. 0 pts: No marks.	10 pts

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:

Name:
Professor’s Name:
Course:
Due Date:
Food Waste
We live in a world where everyone wants the best for themselves. We live in a world where gated communities are surrounded by poor people struggling to make a living. Everyone seeks to better their future even at the expense of other people. No one cares about what the other person eats or how and where they sleep with their families. Everyone is focused on who they are and who they wish to be. In such a society, it makes sense that food waste is a problem in a world where “more than 820 million people in the world are still hungry today” (FAO, 3). In the UK alone, Woolley writes that “roughly a third of the food grown in the field never actually makes into anybody’s mouth.” In the U.S., the problem is much bigger with Suzanne Goldenberg writing that “half of all US food produce is thrown away.” With such statistics in play, the focus has been on how to reduce food waste instead of trying to make sure everyone is fed. Is food waste the problem or a pointer towards humanity’s deep and dark soul? Maybe there is a much bigger problem humanity needs to focus on instead of food waste. Maybe everyone needs to look themselves in the mirror and for once speak some truth because humanity is the problem. So, focus should never be on food waste as a major problem in the world, but on humanity’s self-centeredness which licenses issues such as poverty and heightened rates of inequality in the world.
In the world today, people appear to be more focused on themselves and how they can secure their futures and that of their children while neglecting their roles in helping make the world a better place. Looking at the world today reveals people who are self-absorbed and this negates focusing on food wastage as a main factor in the world. Recently, the world woke up to the news that the famous Notre-Dame cathedral in Paris was on fire. News about the fire that razed the monumental building spread fast and as reported by the BBC, merely 10 days after “the main spire and roof of the building collapsed in a huge fire on 15 April,” pledges run up as high as €750m. However, as reported by Merelli (2019), “the world’s seven largest advanced economies managed to come up with just €20 million ($22 million) to help save it through reforestation.” The “it” in the statement above refers to the Amazon which had been on fire for a long time. A building whose value is unquestionable but of no value to the world’s climate received more money than the Amazon rainforest, which helps to feed millions if not billions of people around the world. Saving the Notre-Dame was a show of financial might by the wealthy, but saving the world appears not to be on anyone’s radar. Additionally, focus for many people has been on their futures as more people are said to be saving than they are spending. Talks of recession, as well as investors losing confidence in the current markets, is enough motivation for people to hold onto what they have. Sharing is out of question in this world as people strive to keep all that they can lay their hands on. Food waste is not the problem. Humanity’s priorities appear to be running backward and where obvious help and change is needed, people run away only to come back and claim whatever glory that they can get through charity and food trucks.
Food waste can never be a topic of discussion in a world where rates of income inequality and unemployment continue to rise. According to inequality.org (2018), the world’s “richest 1% own 45% of the world’s wealth.” How can this be true in a world where 820 million people are hungry? It is a shame that the focus for these people has been to create more wealth instead of trying to reduce vices like hunger and poverty in the world. No one should say food waste is the problem when these people exist and do not see anything wrong with amassing this wealth as others a...

Updated on January 26, 2024

Get the Whole Paper!

Not exactly what you need?

Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Persuasive Research on Ways Europe Could Improve the Use of the Main E-Tourism Platforms

3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Research Paper |
Should American Citizenship be a Birthright? Research Paper

5 pages/≈1375 words | 3 Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Research Paper |
The Importance of Having Positive Attitude

8 pages/≈2200 words | No Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Research Paper |