Cultural Diversity

Cultural Diversity
Name:
Institution
Cultural Diversity
The criminal justice process is quite complex, and normally can be perplexing to people unacquainted with criminal law. As a system, the criminal justice process revolves around a set of activities that are established by a régime. The primary functions of the criminal justice system take account of controlling acts of crime in addition to imposing fines on the wrongdoers. However, it is worth noting that sentencing is debatably the major significant level of the criminal justice structure. Whereas policing techniques aid in establishing who shall go through the criminal procedure at first, prosecutorial alternatives assist in establishing who shall be given leniency from the complete force of justice. The decision to sentence an accused criminal to jail has, up to now, been seen as a thoughtful responsibility, one delegated singly to unbiased prosecutors. Centrally, on a high note, sentencing has turned to be ordinary and mechanistic, a resolution efficiently managed through lawmakers, judges, and sentencing administrators. This reform in the custom of sentencing has had devastating effects for marginalized communities in the United States. The U.S is arguably the most culturally diverse nation in the world with Caucasian majority and other cultures such as Asian, Hispanic, and African American.
However, this diversity has invoked scenario and phenomenon where minority cultures feel aggrieved of discrimination especially the African American, who feels consternated by the US criminal justice system. One of the major comprehensive researches of sentencing discrepancies was carried out by the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services. It was aimed at researching felony sentencing outcomes in New York judicial systems between 1990 and 1992 (Coker, 2003). The Government recommended that one-third of the marginalized communities sentenced to prison might have gotten a lesser or anti- incarceration verdict if they had been handled as equally as native white defendants. If trial-qualified blacks had been treated like their white complements, over 8,000 fewer black defendants might have gotten prison verdicts in that two-year duration. The outcome is a 5% lowering in the proportion of blacks imprisoned as a proportion of the total imprisoned people. Briefly, the research discovered that blacks are imprisoned more regularly than whites for a similar offence.
Polls and statistics in the United States explicitly provides a lot of information concerning the subject. For instance, more than half of the African American community in the country has been apprehended at any one time in their lifetime compared to merely 14% of the White community (Coker, 2003). To put this extent into perspective, African American population makes up only 12% of the US culturally diverse population while they comprise over 45% of inmates in U.S prisons. More so, of the convicts who are sentenced to death, blacks make up to 40% of them. According to statistics that appealed for attention is the 1992 study, younger African Americans were sent to jail than they are to colleges. Depending on the Bureau of Justice Statistics, for every three minorities, one can anticipate to be imprisoned in their existence. Minorities have an uneven number of meetings with police officers, showing that ethnic profiling keeps being a challenge. Reflecting on definition, ethnic profiling proves itself as a question of ethics at its center. In others words, good ruling is related with the right to act and choose to adhere to a particular ruling.
Based on a study carried by the Department of Justice, it is clear that blacks and Hispanics were about thrice more probable to be frisked in the event of a traffic check as compared to white motorists. Black Americans were twice more probable to be imprisoned and nearly four times as probable to encounter the application of force in the event of meeting with law enforcers. Students of the minorities face stiffer punishments in learning institutions than their white friends, resulting to more considerable number of young people incarcerated. Black and Hispanics learners symbolize over 70% of those engaged in school-associated comprehends or transfers to police officers (Murray, 2007). Presently, Black Americans add up to two-fifths and Hispanics one-fifth of the jailed youths currently. Further startling statistics indicates that more are either on parole or probation most of whose age is of early 20s. Even when statistics is explicit that crime among the whites and blacks and Hispanics is more or less the same, disparities in arrests and prison is wide. This is evident based on a 1991 statistic indicating that a ratio disproportion of 100: 1 black to white arrests. The fight on drugs has been focused majorly on minority societies where the minorities are more probable to get greater crimes.
Depending on the Human Rights Watch, Black Americans are no more probable to utilize or trade unlawful drugs than whites. However, they have greater chances of comprehends. Black Americans make up 14% of frequent drug abusers; however, those convicted for drug crimes are...