100% (1)
page:
15 pages/≈4125 words
Sources:
10
Style:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 77.76
Topic:

Leadership Style and Performance in Law Enforcement

Research Paper Instructions:

Senior Project Paper Guidelines

Topic-Leadership Style and performance in Law enforcement

Research question: Does management's ability to change leadership style based on each subordinate law enforcement officer lead to a greater performance in law enforcement interactions with the community?

Hypothesis: By management having a unique leadership interaction with each subordinate law enforcement officer, it will lead to officers wanting to perform at their best capabilities. When people are understood and addressed as unique individuals they will undoubtedly want to excel not only for themselves, but to show their appreciation to their leader.

Part 1- write a one page proposal which will constitute the "bone structure" for the research paper. Appendix and References should appear on page 2.

Proposal should follow this outline:

Chapter I: Introduction

Describe the problem or opportunity that will be addressed in the study. Purpose of the study. “The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of (the independent variable) on (the dependent variable).” Hypothesis: Importance of the study: explain the theoretical and practical importance of the study. Delimitation of the Study: explain what will and what will not be studied.

Chapter II: Review of the Literature

What do we know about the subject? What do we not know but need to know about the subject? Hypothesis 1 – Find one or two studies that support the hypothesis. Provide a brief summary of each study and explain how/why that study is related to the hypothesis. Why/how is our study different from the existing studies that are reviewed?

Chapter III: Theoretical Framework

Find a theory that can explain why the independent variable leads to the dependent variable in each hypothesis. Briefly explain the theory and explain how/why that theory is related to the hypothesis. Present a model diagram.

Chapter IV: Methodology

Research design. Inductive or deductive research process. Specific design used. Unit of analysis. Identify the independent, dependent, and control variables for the hypothesis. How will the variables be measured. List the variables and their indicators. Sampling: define the study population and sample. Plan of analysis. Data acquisition and management procedures. Analysis methods.

Appendices

May include survey or in-depth interview questions, model diagrams, preliminary data, and/or other relevant information.

References

Articles and books, include minimum of 5 scholarly articles.

Part 2- Write a 14 page research paper double spaced, times new roman size 12pts. Appendix should not be counted as part of the 14 pages. Research paper should follow this outline:

Abstract Page

Provide an abstract of the senior project paper, which is a brief summary of the content of the full paper. should show the newness, theory(s), topic, method, findings and contribution. Some phrases or words are “abstracted” from the main body of the proposal and so, some repetition is acceptable. The length should be less than half a page (usually about 150 words). The abstract is usually included on a separate page, although it is often acceptable to have it on top of the first page of the proposal. It should be single-spaced (all other sections of the text should be double spaced; table of contents, references, and texts inside the tables should be single-spaced). It is a good idea to write an abstract after all the other sections of the proposal are completed.

Chapter I: Introduction

Two most important things in the introduction section are the purpose and significance of the study.

Introduction should contain the following:

Explain why the topic is important (statement of the problem): what is the (social, administrative, or management) problem that will be studied? If no specific problem will be addressed, some basic information about the topic can be provided in this section.

Specify what the manuscript is about (Purpose of the study): this section begins with “The purpose of this study is ….”

Theoretical underpinning: express the link between the level of theory and the level of observation. Present the hypothesis in the research hypothesis format (not in the null hypothesis format). Directional hypotheses are preferred. Each hypothesis should indicate the dependent and independent variables. Limit the number of hypotheses to 2 or 3.

Definitions of terms: Defines unusual terms and phrases (this is an optional section and it may go to an appendix, if necessary).

Importance (significance) of the study: explain how the study fills a need for research (fills a gap, resolves a paradox, etc.) Why should we care about the topic? Why is the study important? (Is it because it solves some real world problems? Is it because it adds new pieces of information to the existing literature?)

Anchor the manuscript to a field of research: the manuscript should make a contribution to the development or advancement of theory.

Delimitations of the study: This section defines or narrows the scope of the study by explaining what will be studied and what will NOT be studied. In most cases, we cannot study all aspects of a topic because we do not have enough time, energy, or technical skills. So, we delimit the scope of the study by focusing on only one or more aspects of a topic. For example, assume that we plan to study the issue of quality of life. We may state that we will study the issue of quality of life only in terms of social relationships (excluding the financial, health, and other aspects of quality of life). Then, we are delimiting the scope of the study. We may also delimit the scope of the study by defining or narrowing the study population. For example, we may state that the study will deal with the issue of quality of life only among the senior citizens in one city. This way, we are delimiting the scope of the study to the population of senior citizens in that city.

Chapter II: Review of the Literature

This chapter presents an organized review of the relevant literature. The review should explain the current status of the literature on the topic. The most important item that needs to be included in this chapter is the review of the studies that support the respective relationships in the stated hypotheses. In the process of presenting the studies that support the hypotheses, we may also present some studies that contradict the hypotheses. It is best to organize the literature review around the research hypotheses (or around the dependent and independent variables). A suggestion is to identify the relationship being tested in each hypothesis and using these as the sub-headings. The last part of this chapter should clearly explain why/how your study is different from the existing studies that are reviewed in this chapter. We need to review a minimum of 5 scholarly articles that are written on the chosen topic.

Chapter III: Theoretical Framework

This chapter explains the theories that are behind the hypotheses. Theories explain why the independent variable leads to the dependent variable in each of the hypotheses. You should find a theory or theories that explain each of your hypothesis. You should name your theory and explain the background, structure, and components of the theory or theories. Diagrams or figures may be useful in explaining them. More specifically, this chapter may need the followingcomponents: Theory Specification---we select a theory or theories and explain what they are; Theory Connection---we explain the relationships between the independent and dependent variables in connection with the theories specified previously; Theoretical Models---we provide a diagram that depicts the relationships among the components of the theories. In most cases, that means that we specify the relationships between the independent, dependent, and control variables. The chapter will culminate into (2 or 3) hypotheses correctly formatted that: state the direction of the expected effects; are specific; are testable, and test complex ideas (e.g., specify the nature and direction of the relationships)

Chapter IV: Methodology

Methods: Adequate description of appropriate research methods that match the question being studied (e.g., appropriate levels of analysis, avoidance of common method bias)

Research design: Overall research process: inductive or deductive? The units of analysis (observation)? What is the specific design that will be used to test the hypotheses? Some examples are: cross-sectional design, classic experimental design, one group pre-test post-test design, longitudinal design, correlational design, case study design, qualitative design, etc. The independent, dependent, and control variables of each hypothesis should be stated as well.

Sampling: Define the study population and sample. What is the specific sample that will be used? How will the sample elements be selected? For a survey, the minimum sample size should be 50. For an in-depth interview project, the sample size should be about 8-20.

Research Methods: What is the method by which the necessary information will be collected? Is it an experiment, test, survey, existing data (secondary data), focus group, content analysis, indepth interview, etc.? What are the actual data collection procedures?

Measurement of variables (Instrumentation): How will the concepts (variables) in the hypotheses be measured? More specifically, what are the indicators and instruments of the variables? If the variables are measured with survey questions, specific survey questions should be attached in an appendix. However, which instruments measure what variables should be explained here.

Plan of Analysis: Data acquisition and management procedures (coding, inputting, cleaning, etc.). (Statistical) Analysis methods (what methods and why they are appropriate).

Chapter V: Data Analysis

Sample characteristics: This section describes the characteristics of the sample. If the population characteristics are available, we should compare them with the sample characteristics to see if they are comparable.

Analysis results: This section reports the results of data analysis. Because we are testing several hypotheses, it should be organized around each of the hypotheses (each hypothesis should be a sub-heading for this section). Supplement narrative explanations of your findings with tables. The explanations of results include specific hypothesis tests showing how each was supported or not

Chapter VI: Conclusions

In general, this chapter serves to integrate key elements introduced in the previous chapters.

Summarize findings: this section summarizes the findings that are presented in Chapter 5

Summarize contribution: the section should interpret Chapter 5 findings in terms of the previous research (tie back to the literature review in Chapter 2) and theories (Chapter 3) that were

Mention both the strengths and weaknesses of the study

Explain practical implications of the study: how practitioners can improve their decision making based upon the findings of this study

Identify possible fruitful avenues for future research that build on this study

Endnotes

If there are any, and if footnotes are not used in the text.

References:

A minimum of 10 sources, five (5) of which must be scholarly/peer reviewed sources are expected—those cited only in the text must be in the Reference section Students are encouraged to use ProQuest, EBSCOHost, and other electronic databases at the library website. In so doing students will also be able to export the citation in the appropriate format. Students should also consider utilizing various library services. Others references such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, company annual reports, and budgets can also be included.

Appendixes:

Survey or in-depth interview questions, transcripts for in-depth interviews, and/or other relevant information should be included.

*Note-Data collection among human subjects is not allowed.

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:

Leadership Style and Performance in Law Enforcement
Student’s Name
Institution
Course Number and Name
Instructor’s Name
Date
Part 1
Chapter I: Introduction
This study's purpose is to investigate how leadership style influences performance among law enforcement officers. The study will explore the performance of law enforcement officers in terms of how they interact with the community and respond to emergencies. The goal is to test the following hypothesis: the unique leadership interaction with each subordinate law enforcement officer will lead to improved performance among officers. It will not focus on other aspects of performance, such as the quantity of work performed by each law enforcement officer.
Chapter II: Review of the Literature
Garner (2017) found that law enforcement leaders have recently been adopting a humanistic approach in their leadership styles. They are now focusing on compassion and empathy and seeking input from their subordinates. They are focusing on the need of their followers, which requires a unique interaction with each follower. The current study is different from existing studies because it explores how the ability of law enforcement leaders to interact uniquely with followers influences their performance.
Chapter III: Theoretical Framework
The hypotheses for this study are founded on the situational leadership theory (SLT). This theory proposes that the most influential leaders rely on more than one leadership style to influence followers.
Chapter IV: Methodology
The study will utilize a deductive research process and a correlational research design.
Part 2
Abstract
The leadership style adopted by top management in an organization influences the actions of subordinates. It is, therefore, imperative to explore leadership styles and how they affect the performance of law enforcement officers. This study's purpose is to explore whether the ability of law enforcement organizations' management to adapt their leadership style to meet the unique needs of each law enforcement officer positively influences the officers' performance. Based on insights from situational and transformational leadership theories, the study utilizes a correlational research design and obtains data using questionnaires and surveys. The results indicate that the ability of law enforcement managers to interact uniquely with subordinates positively influences their emergency response performance and community interactions. Practitioners in this field must establish ways to train law enforcement leaders to adapt to the unique needs of law enforcement officers to improve their individual performance.
Chapter I: Introduction
It is widely known and accepted that top management's leadership style influences subordinates' actions in an organization. For instance, leaders who adopt empowering leadership styles influence their subordinates to have empowered behavior in the workplace (Park & Hassan, 2018). A leader's effectiveness is often measured based on the outcomes of the subordinates. Thus, it is crucial to understand how leadership styles impact subordinates.
Statement of the Problem
Leadership and leadership styles in law enforcement play a significant role. According to Garner (2017), leadership is viewed as a relational and influence process focusing not only on leaders but also on followers and how the interactions between the two affect organizational performance. The relationships between leadership styles and organizational performance have been investigated, and results indicate that some leadership styles negatively influence organizational performance while others positively influence performance. For instance, Al Khajeh (2018) reveals that charismatic, transactional, and bureaucratic leadership styles negatively influence organizational performance, while autocratic, transformational, and democratic leadership styles positively influence organizational performance. The problem of focus in this study is leadership styles and how they affect the performance of law enforcement officers.
Purpose of the Study
This study's purpose is to investigate how leadership style influences performance among law enforcement officers. Specifically, the study will explore whether the ability of law enforcement organizations' management to adapt their leadership style to meet the unique needs of each law enforcement officer positively influences the officers’ performance. There are many leadership styles that leaders can adopt to influence their followers. In addition, different followers have unique needs that can only be met by specific leadership styles. As Garner (2017) notes, in today’s leadership context, effective leadership involves addressing the situational components and the leader-follower interactions in organizations. As such, leaders need to incorporate different leadership styles to match the situational components and unique leader-follower interactions.
Theoretical Underpinning
Situational and transformational leadership theories offer insights into how leaders can influence their followers' performance based on the leadership style they adopt. This study will utilize insights from these two theories to explore the following hypotheses:
Hypothesis 1: Management’s unique leadership interaction with each subordinate law enforcement officer will lead to improved emergency response
Hypothesis 2: Management’s unique leadership interaction with each subordinate law enforcement officer will lead to improved law enforcement officers-community interactions
Significance of the Study
Much research has been done to establish the relationship between leadership styles and followers' performance. However, most of this research has focused more on corporate organizations and less on law enforcement organizations. Some studies have investigated what counts as effective leadership in law enforcement (Garner, 2017), while others have explored how leadership trickles down to subordinates in law enforcement (Park & Hassan, 2018). Others have examined how specific leadership styles influence the performance of law enforcement officers (Alsuwaidi & Mansor, 2021). The current study is significant because it aims to add new information to the existing literature on leadership in law enforcement.
Delimitations of the Study
This study will examine whether adopting different leadership styles to match followers' uniqueness can improve law enforcement officers' performance. Specifically, the study will only explore the performance of law enforcement officers in terms of how they interact with the community and respond to emergencies. It will not focus on other aspects of performance, such as the quantity of work performed by each law enforcement officer.
Chapter II: Review of the Literature
Leadership and Leadership Styles in Law Enforcement
Leadership and leadership styles in law enforcement are unique due to the unique nature of work in such organizations. However, efforts to define what characterizes effective leadership in law enforcement indicate that there has been a transformation, and law enforcement agencies are not left behind in adapting their leadership approaches to changing times. For instance, Garner (2017) found that many leaders in law enforcement have recently incorporated a humanistic approach in their leadership styles. Specifically, law enforcement leaders are now more focused on treating their followers as individuals rather than as a collective. They have become more employee-centered, focusing on compassion, empathy, and seeking input from their subordinates rather than giving orders and practicing tighter controls on employees (Garner, 2017). By being employee-centered, law enforcement leaders are focusing on the needs of the subordinates to identify ways to help them become highly productive. Today, leadership in law enforcement is assessed based on how effective the interaction between the leaders and the followers is.
Also, the leadership styles among law enforcement officers and how they trickle down to subordinates have been investigated. Often, the leadership style adopted by leaders influences the behavior of subordinates. For instance, Park and Hassan (2018) found that law enforcement leaders who adopt empowering leadership styles pass down that empowerment to their subordinates. Ultimately, these subordinates are more empowered and able to use their voice because of the empowering leadership styles of their managers. This shows that the leadership approach adopted by law enforcement leaders affects the behavior of law enforcement officers. However, Klijn et al. (2020) investigated the effects of leadership style on the enforcement style of inspectors. They found that the leadership style of supervisors did not affect the enforcement approach adopted by law enforcement officers. This indicates that, in some cases, the leadership style of law enforcement managers does not affect the behavior of the followers.
Additionally, different leadership styles among law enforcement managers have different effects on subordinates. According to Miller (2020), the adoption of transformational leadership among law enforcement managers is associated with increased job satisfaction among subordinates. Specifically, this relationship is linked to the inspirational motivation and idealized influence of transformational leadership.
However, transactional and laissez-faire leadership styles have no significant effect on job satisfaction among law enforcement officers (Miller, 2020). These findings suggest that law enforcement managers must adopt leadership styles that are more effective based on what they want to achieve and what their followers need.
Performance in Law Enforcement
Every organization desires highly productive employees whose performance is at its peak. Nevertheless, this is not always the case and understanding the factors that influence employee performance in any organization is crucial. According to Hassan et al. (2018), one of the factors that contribute to high performance in law enforcement is leadership, and more specifically, empowering leadership. Empowering leadership practices promote law enforcement officers' engagement, satisfaction, and commitment to their work, which in turn enhances their performance. Improved followers' performance is attributed to the fact that empowered employees are able to make timely decisions, engage in effective teamwork, and demonstrate confidence while performing their work (Hassan et al., 2018). The ability of law enforcement officers to perform their tasks thoroughly and effectively is influenced by the leadership practices adopted by leaders; the more empowering the practices, the better the performance of subordinates.
The performance of law enforcement officers has been linked to other leadership approaches in addition to empowering leadership practices. For instance, Hassan and Jiang (2019) indicate that inclusive leadership among law enforcement managers enhances the performance of law enforcement workgroups. This effect is mediated by officers' motivation to engage in higher learning. Specifically, when law enforcement managers use inclusive leadership approaches, they motivate their followers to engage in higher learning, which contributes to improved workgroup performance (Hassan & Jiang, 2019). Inclusion allows followers to feel supported and seen, which is necessary for enhancing their performance. Inclusive leadership encourages and appreciates different perspectives and ideas for subordinates, facilitates open communication, and creates a safe culture where employees can acknowledge and learn from their mistakes without fear of reprimand from their leaders. Inclusive leadership in law enforcement is vital because, often, the clear lines of power can hinder open communication and a culture of safety.
Further, performance in law enforcement, especially in teams, has also been linked to not only leadership style but also attributes such as gender homogeneity and team awareness. According to Schaveling et al. (2017), gender homogeneity among law enforcement teams positively influences team performance. In such teams, there is limited friction between team members because of a lack of gender diversity, which makes it easier for leaders and team members to work together with less conflict. Schaveling et al. (2017) also reveal that incorporating charismatic, transactional, and empowering leadership approaches in law enforcement leadership influences the teams' performance.
Current Study
The current study is different from other studies because it pays particular attention to leadership styles and how the ability of leaders to interact uniquely with followers influences their individual performance. Current literature shows that there is insufficient research on how leadership affects individual performance among law enforcement officers. This study will fill this gap by exploring how law enforcement leaders' ability to adjust based on the unique needs of followers affects followers' performance.
Chapter III: Theoretical Framework
The hypotheses for this study are founded on two theories; situational and transformational leadership theories.
Situational Leadership Theory
Situational leadership theory (SLT) provides insights that can explain the relationships between leadership styles and employee performance. According to Davis and Silvestri (2020), STL places high emphasis on the organizational context or situation in which leaders have to make decisions. It proposes that the most effective leaders rely on more than one leadership style to influence followers. They select the leadership style to match the context or situation they are facing, and each situation calls for a different leadership style. The SLT is different from other leadership theories because rather than focusing on the qualities, behavior, or personality traits that make a good leader, it focuses on the situational components facing the leader (Davis & Silvestri, 2020). The theory proposes that effective leaders must focus on the needs of their followers by adapting to the situation. It calls for leaders to be aware of the organization's context and the individual motivation of followers.
By adopting SLT, leaders can assess the situation and incorporate the leadership styles that best suit the situation and the needs of the followers (Davis & Silvestri, 2020). Also, SLT emphasizes a focus on team development through appropriate leadership styles. McGiboney (2018) reveals that in SLT, the appropriate leadership style is established based on the maturity of the followers. Maturity refers to the knowledge, skills, and competence levels of the followers. On the one hand, followers with low maturity and ability levels require a different leadership style, which involves leaders telling the followers what to do and adopting a hands-on approach (McGiboney, 2018). On the other hand, followers with high maturity and ability levels require a leadership styl...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!