Compare and contrast between two healthcare systems Research Paper

Healthcare Systems of Canada and America
[name]
[school/course]
[professor]
[date]I - Introduction
II - Body
Healthcare Funding
Modified vs. Uniformity
Health Outcomes
Shortage of Nurse Practitioners
III - ConclusionIntroduction
Countries and governments would often modify their health care systems as appropriate to their capacity to provide health care services. Although the medical field has a general protocol, which all medical institutions follow and utilize, some of the systems would include health provisions according to national or local mandates as well as the funding source. Laws and funding are just among the many aspects that influence health care systems everywhere.
Most western health care systems are among the advanced and well-funded medical care in the world (Johnson, 2002). Their medical institutions are highly likely up to date with medical science researches and new studies. Moreover, they would utilize latest tools and medical pieces of equipment in their operations and practices. They all imply the support of countries to their health systems. Aside from sectors like education and agriculture, these countries put enough attention into developing their health sector (Johnson, 2002).
As a look into the western health care system, this paper will discuss the American and Canadian health care systems. To further review the American and Canadian health care systems, this paper will compare and contrast vital aspects that make their operations possible and promising.Body
Healthcare Funding
Canada and America have both put effort and attention into developing their medical sector. Their concerns are both giving the proper health care service for everyone, not just for the privilege. Their health care services would even prioritize the elderly and the minority sector. It is one of the admirable characteristics of the western health care system: they include all types of citizens in the accessibility of medical services.
Canada's health care system, though, is more comprehensive and encouraging, in a way. That is, their health accessibility does not discriminate nor hinders minority and less fortunate. Instead, they are prioritized and given more attention to the health sector. It does not entail that the privileged and can-afford citizens receive less amount of services, nor do they receive an exemption from benefits. All Canadian citizens receive the same quality of medical services regardless of their social and economic status. It is possible because Canada's health care systems are government-funded, which means they provide public health benefits and services (Mann, 2020).
On the other hand, America divides its health insurance and providers to public and private entities (Mann, 2020). Public health insurance is a government-funded health benefit that mostly prioritizes the poor and less capable. On the other hand, private entities arrange private insurances for people. In most cases, employers would provide health insurance to their employees as part of their benefits. Regardless, both health insurance providers cover health expenses that are within the scope of the insurance.
In this aspect, we can see that while Canada shoulders its citizens' health benefits, America shares the responsibility with private insurance providers. Canada could handle its health care insurance for everyone because of its lesser population density than America. America would need the assistance of private insurance providers to deliver a health care system for all.
Modified vs. Uniformity.
In America, healthcare systems in different areas and different institutions are operating separately. They do not necessarily have individual uniqueness in their operations. Instead, America's healthcare institutions, whether clinics, medical groups, federal hospitals, or any health facility, all operate according to what suits their area and disposition (Mann, 2020). For one, private or public entities provide health insurance depending on what is available and suitable for a person (Mann, 2020). Healthcare systems in America do not follow a common standard for a healthcare system (Mann, 2020). Since each state is autonomously operating, the mandates and laws on the health sector influence the operations of health institutions. Also, the ability of a local government to fund its health sector manipulates the healthcare service's performance. For areas that have firm support in their health system, the development of healthcare services is bound to offer quality services. On the other hand, states that have less attention for the health sector may not operate as efficiently and effectively as the competent ones.
Canada, on the other hand, is more uniformed and similar in its healthcare system all over the country (Mann, 2020). It means that the health facilities, clinics, institutions, etc., are following a standard medical operating protocol. For instance, the government holds the responsibility of funding health benefits for all. Health assistance applies to all Canadian citizens, regardless of living status (Mann, 2020). It is possible and reasonable for Canada to have the capacity to support their people's health support because their population is not as dense as other countries. The size of their cou...