Telemedicine for Patients Diagnosed with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
To begin, work through the reference list you created in Section B: Problem Description. Appraise each resource using the one of the “Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists” located in Appendix B, pp. 708-722of the Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt text in the course materials or other literature review tools such as the ones used in NUR551 in the Johns Hopkins Model. The specific checklist you use will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource (i.e., case-control studies, or cohort studies, etc.).
Develop an “Evidence Synthesis” table to organize and summarize the research studies. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only
16research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. Refer to the “Evaluation and Synthesis Tables” templates in Appendix C,pp. 723-727of the Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt text, or you may use this table that uses the PICO to summarize the research studies:
Author,
title, journal Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Validity
Write a narrative of 750-1,000 words (not including the title page and reference list) that presents the research support for the project’s problem and proposed solution.
Make sure to do the following:
1.Include a description of the search method (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
2.Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
3.Incorporate a description of the validity of the internal and external research.
It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles. Please, submit the checklist information and the evaluation table you design for the instructor as well as the narrative that summarizes the information.
The grading guidelines for this assignment are in the rubric section of this syllabus. Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine Section C: Literature Support for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
Title
Your Name:
Subject and Section:
Professor’s Name:
Date Submitted:
Telemedicine for Patients Diagnosed with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative neuromuscular condition that has already affected many people and cause many studies about the various aspects of the disease. New knowledge regarding medical assessments and interventions is continuously progressing, especially with the current need to explore another aspect of the condition due to sudden healthcare changes. In response to the current healthcare system with numerous precautions and restrictions, patients with conditions such as ALS are now forced to change their routine to adjust to the new normal, limiting them from attending their regular face-to-face medical consultations with multidimensional assessments for systems such as respiratory, neurological, psychological, functional, etc. Both monitoring and management in patients with ALS are vital, resulting in the emergence of teleconsultation or telemedicine to address ALS patients' needs without increasing the risk of contracting and spreading the COVID-19 virus. However, this method raises concerns regarding virtual medical consultations' effectiveness compared to traditional and hands-on consultations. The purpose of this literature review is to examine the available research on the efficacy of telemedicine with comparison to traditional care and consultation in providing multidimensional care for patients diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Search Methods
The research databases used to find studies relevant to the research question are Science Direct, EBSCO Host, and PubMed. The keywords used are telemedicine, remote monitoring, nursing, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, telehealth, ALS, neurodegenerative muscular conditions, ALS treatment, ALS monitoring, virtual consultation, and teleconsultation. The research studies are further narrowed down by the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria are either male or female, with a diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and are receiving multidisciplinary care. The exclusion criteria used are comorbidities or conditions that mimic ALS. 5 studies' symptoms are included to be part of the current research.
Research evidence summary: Population
Patients and caregivers are involved in the studies as there are patients with ALS whose quality of life and functions are heavily affected by the condition. The focus of the research are patients diagnosed with ALS who are receiving multidisciplinary care for their condition. The confounding factors such as other conditions or present comorbidities that may affect the study results were identified.
Research evidence summary: Intervention
Features of Telemedicine
Telemedicine utilizes video conferencing instead of telephone communication. This requires a stable internet connection to conduct health care assessments and care. The teleconsultation similar to stroke care with neurological evaluation will be demonstrated. The accessibility and cost-effectiveness of telemedicine will highly benefit ALS patients in providing quality multidisciplinary care for increased survival (Hobson et al., 2016). In addition to the complexity of the technology required in telemedicine, the program's service and flow are also some of the aspects that need to be considered (Hobson et al., 2018). The assessments that are included in the remote consultation are neurologic, respiratory, physical, cognitive, psychological, and nutrition to provide holistic and multidimensional care to ALS patients.
Telemedicine in ALS patients
There is still a limited number of studies on telemedicine's efficacy in the monitoring and treating ALS, but the currently available research supports telemedicine for the decrease of disease progression and number of hospital visits. An example of telemedicine is the study by Selkirk et al., where extensive remote consultations had proven to be beneficial to ALS patients even at remote locations (2017).
Research evidence summary: Comparison
Traditional consultation is given the face-to-face assessment done by ALS specialists, a neurologist, and an ALS nurse. A research study exhibiting holistic and multidisciplinary care involves identifying impairments and disabilities, which dictates the patients' interdisciplinary needs. A meeting with the stakeholders is also required to track possible changes (Selkirk et al., 2017).
Research evidence summary: Outcomes
The clinical outcomes are measured using the standard outcome measure for ALS patients, the ALSFRS-r, which measures the patients' functional status. This quick assessment of speech, swallowing, upper and lower body movement, and repetitive assessments can gauge ALS patients' disease progression over some time (Selkirk et al., 2017). Other outcome measures that are monitored are the mortality rates of ALS patients due to complications. The hospitalization rate is also monitored if telemedicine influences the trend that is expected of ALS patients.
Validity description
The research studies' nature poses current challenges in the validity of the outcome measures used during the remote assessment. There are also possible barriers to the use of technology and the procedures' regulation (Hobson et al., 2016). The internal validity of the research studies is challenged by selection bias and attrition. The participants cannot be blinded and randomized due to the nature of the intervention. Attrition rates are also standard in some of the studies due to non-compliance of the participants, and intention-to-treat analysis is used to address dropouts.
The results of the research studies that were gathered have excellent external validity due to the population's specific characteristics focusing on ALS. Although, the studies' sample size can still be increased to improve the generalizability of the results. The outcomes that were measured through virtual consultations are also highly applicable to other populations or settings.
Research evidence summary: scientific merit related to the problem
All the research studies that met the criteria are involved patients wit...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
Advance Health Care Directive vs Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment
4 pages/≈1100 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Research Paper |
-
Nursing Interventions to Prevent Patient Falls
3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Research Paper |
-
Family Health Assessment (Health, Medicine, Nursing Research Paper)
4 pages/≈1100 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Research Paper |