Applying Theory to a Practice Problem: Part 3: Application of Borrowed Theory to Problem and Conclusion
ASSIGNMENT: Benchmark Assignment: Applying Theory to a Practice Problem: Part 3: Application of Borrowed Theory to Problem and Conclusion
PURPOSE:
It is important to understand how borrowed theory can help you in your everyday environment as a nurse. In the previous assignment, you identified a practical problem that emerged from the evidence in the extant literature or professional practice, and you explored how middle-range theory could be applied to solve the problem. In this assignment, you will explore and apply borrowed theory to solve the specific problem that you identified previously, and you will synthesize the applications of the middle-range theory and the borrowed theory into the most appropriate solution to the problem.
DIRECTIONS:
Consider the problem that you described in the previous assignments and the instructor feedback about those assignments.
Write a paper (1,750 to 2,000 words) that describes how borrowed theory can be applied to the identified problem. The paper should include the following:
1) A brief summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied.
2) A description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem. Is this borrowed theory appropriate to your identified problem?
3) A brief history of the borrowed theory's origins.
4) A discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied.
5) A discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem. How would your practice change by incorporating this theory?
6) A discussion of how application of both the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory can be integrated to create the most appropriate solution to the identified problem.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
RUBRIC
Benchmark Assignment: Applying Theory to a Practice Problem: Part 3: Application of Borrowed Theory to Problem and Conclusion
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
80.00%
3
Satisfactory
88.00%
4
Good
92.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %
Content
5.0 %
Summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied
A summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied is either missing or not evident to the reader.
A summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied is present, but incomplete or inaccurate.
A summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied is presented but is disjointed. The research cited is outdated.
A summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied is thoroughly presented and includes all necessary elements. Some research cited in is outdated.
A summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes all necessary elements.
5.0 %
Description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem
A description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem is either missing or not evident to the reader.
A description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem is present, but incomplete or inaccurate.
A description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. The research cited in the definition is outdated.
A description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem is thoroughly presented and includes all necessary elements. Some research cited in the definition is outdated.
A description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes all necessary elements.
15.0 %
A history of the borrowed theory's origins
A history of the borrowed theory's origins is either missing or not evident to the reader.
A history of the borrowed theory's origins is present, but incomplete or inaccurate.
A history of the borrowed theory's origins is present, but cursory. The research used for support is outdated.
A history of the borrowed theory's origins is present and thorough. The description is moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated.
A history of the borrowed theory's origins is present, thorough, and well-detailed. The description is well supported with current and/or seminal research.
15.0 %
Discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied
A discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied is either missing or not evident to the reader.
A discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied is present, but incomplete or inaccurate.
A discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied is present, but cursory. The research used for support is outdated.
A discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied is present and thorough. The description is moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated.
A discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied is present, thorough, and well-detailed. The description is well supported with current and/or seminal research.
15.0 %
Discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem
A discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem is either missing or not evident to the reader.
A discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem is present, but incomplete or illogical.
A discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem is present, but cursory. The research used for support is outdated.
A discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem is present and thorough. The description is moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated.
A discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem is present, thorough, and well-detailed. The description is well supported with current and/or seminal research.
15.0 %
Discussion of the integration of the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory
A discussion of the integration of the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory is either missing or not evident to the reader.
A discussion of the integration of the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory is present, but incomplete or illogical.
A discussion of the integration of the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory is present, but cursory. The research used for support is outdated.
A discussion of the integration of the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory is moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated.
A discussion of the integration of the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory is present, thorough, and well-detailed. The description is well supported with current and/or seminal research.
20.0 %
Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %
Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %
Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %
Format
5.0 %
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %
Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %
Total Weightage
Benchmark Assignment: Applying Theory to a Practice Problem: Part 3: Application of Borrowed Theory to Problem (inadequate staffing levels) and conclusion
Name
Course: NUR 502 – Theoretical Foundations for Nursing Roles and Practice
Instructor
Date
Brief summary of the problem
Inadequate staffing levels affect the working environment and patient care, as the hospitals and health centers may be forced to use less qualified staff. The primary role of nurses is to improve patient care and safety. Safe nursing levels improve care since inadequate staffing levels compromise the quality of care. Even though, each patient requires different care, adequate staffing levels support interventions to improve patient outcomes (Zalenski, & Raspa, 2006). The nurses and management are more likely to identify to identify risks to patients and monitor them to take action while addressing patient needs. The Swanson theory is an appropriate middle-range theory applicable in improving patient care (McEwen, & Wills, 2011). As nurses’ focus on understanding the patient experience regardless of whether there is nursing shortage.
Description of a borrowed theory
A borrowed/ shared theory is one that is used in another discipline, but has not been adapted in nursing practice and the world view (McEwen & Wills, 2011). The theories are useful in predicting, explaining, describing or and controlling a phenomenon. Maslow hierarchy of needs is viable in addressing concerns about staffing needs, where nurses show care and concern while improving health outcomes (Zalenski, & Raspa, 2006). People first satisfy their physiological needs including food and shelter they then require to satisfy the safety needs, love and belonging, esteem and self-actualization. The theory assumes that satisfaction progresses while frustration regresses; since people need to satisfy the lower level needs as they move up the hierarchy of needs.
The inadequate staffing levels affect the wok productivity since there is increased work burden and this also compromises patient health. The health practitioners grow more frustrated in the workplace that they have low motivation. The employee working motivation and empowerment are associated with positive working experiences. The nurses ought to feel safe, in an environment that supports their needs. The hierarchy of needs achieves this as the nurses are more likely to have a sense of belonging when their needs are addressed. Inadequate staffing levels cause jobs satisfaction and stress levels, while this has negative implications for clinical practice. It is then necessary for health practitioners to cater for their basic needs and improve the patient care by tackling patient concerns.
Focusing on training, time and staffing needs are important elements to improving staffing requirements, while the theory is linked to the work environment through the motivation aspect. Motivation pushes people to act and get the desired results. When the hospital administration fails to address employee and patient concerns they are faced with the challenge of motivating the workers. The identified theory is assessed based on improvement in health outcomes as represented by quality indicators including improved job satisfaction and fewer patient deaths.
A brief history of the borrowed theory's origins
In addressing the people’s basic needs, Abraham Maslow recognized that needs took precedence over others some needs were preferred over other (Brownlee, 2006). Maslow was inspired by experiments in psychology in 1940’s focusing on motivation, and he applied his observation to different settings (Brownlee, 2006). Physiological needs are the basic wants of a person that need to be fulfilled, and people need to eat, drink as no one can do without these needs whether they are healthy or not. Failure to meet this affects one negatively and the ideas of a hierarchy of ideas can be adapted in nursing delivering quality care. Even among other humanistic theories Maslow’s approach has been highlighted in organization performance as it is related to motivation, and factors that influence workplace productivity.
How the borrowed theory has been previously applied
In a study by Groff Paris, & Terhaar, (2011), the researchers looked into the application of Maslow’s theoretical framework determine whether this model improved the nurses performance and quality. The researchers conducted the pilot study with the aim of identifying how nursing perceptions affect the practice environment in improving patient care (Groff Paris, & Terhaar, 2011). The case of using Maslow’s theoretical framework is that the researchers adopted the tool to support strategy based on the five hierarchical levels. Even though, the study used other tools for analysis, Maslow’s hierarchical guideline was essential to understanding the impact of addressing environmental needs in nursing practice.
Before the implementation of the framework, the researchers and nurses sought to identify the most viable workflow schedule, breaks and overtime expectations. The next face of the hierarchical order focused on using the hospital resources, technology, nurse relationship and nurse ratios. The need for belonging highlighted the case of job embeddedness, communication, cohesion, teamwork, and collaboration (Groff Paris, & Terhaar, 2011). When nurses are motivated they were more likely to work together and this improved patient outcomes, and this was identified as being crucial to addressing staffing needs. The more prepared the nurses the easier it was to implement changes and collaborate to meet the set objectives. The high level of the pyramid corresponding to the need for self-actualization, and self-esteem was associated with empowering the nurses to make decisions, maintain autonomy while controlling practice.
Hospitals may face inadequate staffing levels, and the study highlighted that there are still opportunities for improvement in the delivery of care. However, this was affected by the nurses’ job enjoyment as well as the perceived quality of care (Groff Paris, & Terhaar, 2011). Te research further highlighted areas requiring improvement to address patient concerns based on the nurses’ responses. There was concern that the...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
US Surgeon General Website
7 pages/≈1925 words | 5 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Research Paper |
-
M2D1: Implementing the National Viral Hepatitis Action Plan
1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Research Paper |
-
M3D1 Assignment: Social Media in the Perioperative Setting
1 page/≈275 words | 3 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Research Paper |