100% (1)
page:
8 pages/≈2200 words
Sources:
2
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 50.11
Topic:

Analysis of an Empirical Research Journal Article

Research Paper Instructions:

Review & Analysis of an Empirical Research Journal Article 



In this assignment you will apply the methodological concepts you have learned this semester to the evaluation of a research article by demonstrating your ability by specifically analyze and critique a peer reviewed journal article linking the procedures discussed in the article to the concepts taught in class. This shouldn’t be based on opinion, but rather linking specific elements in the article to the research and statistical concepts reviewed each week during the semester. 



There will be several elements graded in the paper as listed below. The analysis should be specific (avoid rambling) and demonstrate that you understand what you are saying regarding each element of the review & analysis. 



You can analyze the article by question (i.e. Question 1, Question 2, etc.). Include the question, followed by your analysis. Follow APA for margins, page numbering, and the reference. Provide a copy of the article for the instructor. 



Elements required and assessed in the analysis:



1. Choose an appropriate article for review. The article chosen for review should be an empirical peer-reviewed journal article of a health-related topic that is no more than 5 years old. Do not use secondary sources, magazines, or abstracts. Only a peer-reviewed journal article is appropriate.

2. Provide a concise and accurate summary of the article being reviewed & analyzed. 

3. Identify the type of research conducted in the article and the characteristics that support your identified research type (qualitative, survey, cohort, randomized controlled trial (RCT), cross-sectional, correlational research, experimental, quasi-experimental, single subject, case study, case-control study, other). 

4. Identify whether key elements are included. Identify whether key elements of the article are present in the article: appropriate title, key terms, abstract, introduction, purpose, rationale, research question/hypothesis, literature review, clear description of participants/subjects methods, results, discussion & references. 

5. Identify the main hypothesis and research question that is driving the research. The research question may not be specifically stated; you can use your analytic skills and infer what the research question is. Summarize how they are being tested. 

6. Operationally define the key variables measured. Give units and level of measurement. Provide inclusion/exclusion criteria if present. Discuss the impact the inclusion/exclusion criteria have on the measurement of the variables and the reasoning behind the criteria such as controlling for confounds (should be in the article).

7. Identify key elements of the methods section. Is there a strategy for conducting the investigation that you feel is clear and valid? Is the research design identified and is it appropriate for the study being conducted? Describe the population & sample. Does the sample size seem adequate to power the study? Identify the variables being studied, the data collection strategy, and the type of data collected. Is baseline data included? Does the study seem to follow APA style guidelines or another manual of style such as MLA, Chicago, or AMA? 

8. Explain the use of descriptive and inferential stats (should have both). Are there measures of central tendencies, variability, correlations, test statistics, etc? Are tables and figures included?

9. Critique choice of methods and stats, including the sampling methodology and sample size. Comment on any tools used for measurement as related to reliability and validity. Specifically discuss the statistical methods used and if they were appropriate for the variables analyzed. Include strengths and weaknesses of the analysis. Did the tables and figures add value to the article?

10. Explain the practical and statistical significance of the main results. 

11. Discuss how the article you reviewed & analyzed connects (or doesn’t connect) with everyday Health Science. 

12. Provide an overall opinion regarding the robustness of the article. Discuss whether the article controls for bias and confounding factors. Discuss strengths & limitations of the research. 

13. Provide a full reference for the article completed in APA format.

14. Provide the instructor with a copy of the article. 











Please see Grading Rubric on the next page





























Final Project Grading Rubric

A Article 

 -  Appropriate article chosen for review. 

 -  Provided a concise and accurate summary of the article being reviewed & analyzed.

 -  Identify the type of research conducted in the article.

 -  Identified whether key elements are included. 3 points

B Research Overview

 -  Identified the main hypothesis and summarized how they are being tested.

 -  Operationally defined the key variables measured. Provided units and level of measurement. Provided inclusion/exclusion criteria if present. Discussed the impact the inclusion/exclusion criteria have on the measurement of the variables and the reasoning behind the criteria such as controlling for confounds.

 -  Identified key elements of the methods section. 8 points

C Statistical Analysis



 -  Identified key elements of the methods section.

 -  Explained the use of descriptive and inferential stats (should have both).

 -  Critique choice of methods and stats, including the sampling methodology and sample size. Comment on any tools used for measurement as related to reliability and validity.

 -  Explained the practical and statistical significance of the main results. 9 points 

G Application



 Discussed how the article you reviewed & analyzed connects (or doesn’t connect) with everyday Health Science. 

Discussed your overall opinion regarding the robustness of the article? Discuss whether the article controls for bias and confounding factors. Discuss strengths & limitations of the research.

Provided a full reference for the article completed in APA format. 

Provided a copy of the article for the instructor.

5 points

TOTAL 25 points 

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:
Review & Analysis of an Empirical Research Journal Article
Student:
Professor:
Course title:
Date:
Review & Analysis of an Empirical Research Journal Article
A Article
Question 1: an appropriate article for review
Fenko, A., & Loock, C. (2014). The Influence of Ambient Scent and Music on Patients' Anxiety in a Waiting Room of a Plastic Surgeon. Health Environments Research & Design Journal (HERD) (Vendome Group LLC), 7(3), 38-59.
This is an empirical peer-reviewed journal article. The waiting environment plays a vital role in patients’ healthcare experience given that patients usually spend a long time period waiting for the physician, at times even more time compared to the actual duration of the appointment with the doctor. It is important to invest in the physical attractiveness of patient waiting areas and the specific physical elements which contribute to positive attributions related to quality of care need to be identified (Fenko & Loock, 2014). In their study, the authors of the present study investigated the possibilities of improving the experience of patients inside a plastic surgeon’s waiting room through the use of ambient environmental stimuli – music and scent. As such, the topic of the selected article is health-related. Published in the year 2014, the article is no more than 5 years old.
Question 2: concise and accurate summary of the article
Today, more and more people are opting to have plastic surgeries. Every year, reconstructive and plastic surgeons assist patients with burn injuries, animal bites, disfiguring wounds, as well as congenital malformations for instance cleft palate and cleft lip. They also help patients who require reconstruction following surgical operation for chronic conditions such as malignancy. Cosmetic plastic surgery encompasses surgical operations which reshape normal body structures so as to improve the patient’s self-esteem and appearance (Fenko & Loock, 2014). Waiting for a scheduled time with a surgeon could greatly increase the anxiety of a patient. Making the waiting time prior to an appointment more pleasant and decreasing the anxiety of the patient is of great importance. Ambient environmental stimuli could influence the behaviour, cognition and mood of people. Fenko and Loock (2014) performed the experimental study for the purpose of testing whether or not ambient scent and music could be helpful in reducing anxiety of patients.
Question 3: Type of research conducted in the article
The study is an experimental study. In this study, Fenko and Loock (2014) carried out a field experiment with two (scent absent versus scent present) by two (music absent versus music present) between-subjects design with plastic surgeon patients. An experiment is understood as a study wherein a program, procedure, or treatment is deliberately introduced and an outcome or result is introduced. Experiments are tests under controlled conditions done to examine the validity of a hypothesis, to illustrate a known truth, or to establish the effectiveness of something that has not been tried yet. The identified study has characteristics which imply that it is an experimental study. For instance, participants were chosen randomly. Moreover, there were experimental groups and a control group. Furthermore, several variables are manipulated in order to establish how they affect a dependent variable. Specifically, Fenko and Loock (2014) investigated the effects of relaxing music and scent used in combination and separately on patient’s anxiety level, evaluation of the waiting environment, as well as perceived waiting time.
Question 4: key elements are included
This peer-reviewed journal article has a number of key elements. Appropriate title: this is put at the top of the article on the first page. The title is as follows: The Influence of Ambient Scent and Music on Patient’s Anxiety in a Waiting Room of a Plastic Surgeon. Abstract and key terms: The article has a terse abstract which briefly describes the objective, background, methods, results, and conclusions of the study. The abstract also has 5 keywords. Introduction: The article has an introduction which introduces the reader to the topic and subject matter at hand. The introduction clearly describes the aim of the study and what the authors were interested in. Purpose: the purpose of the study is clearly described; it is to investigate the influence of ambient music and scent, as well as their combination on the anxiety of patients inside a plastic surgeon’s waiting room.
Rationale: according to Fenko and Loock (2014), ambient environmental stimuli could influence the behaviour, cognition, and mood of people. Their study was carried out to find out if ambient music and scent could be useful in lowering the anxiety of patients. Research question/hypothesis: can ambient music and scent help to reduce the anxiety of patients who are waiting to undergo plastic surgery? Literature review: Fenko and Loock (2014) examined several previous studies on the subject matter. The authors noted that as an environmental feature, scent has been studied widely within the context of consumer behaviour. The scent of lavender as opposed to the scent of lemon, for example, has been proven to have a relaxing effect on consumers and increased the customers’ length of stay inside the eatery. All in all, over 20 previous studies were examined by the authors in their review of existing literature.
Participants/subjects: in the study, the subjects included patients of Dr. Abdul Yousef, a plastic surgeon at the Elizabeth Hospital. The patients were suffering largely from functional problems with their hands (hand surgery) as well as aesthetic concerns (face and breast surgery). The participants took part voluntarily and they provided written permission to utilize their data. The authors included 117 patients in total in their study; women were 89 and men were 28. The participants’ age ranged from 14 years to 88, with 47.92 years being the mean age (Fenko & Loock, 2014). There were 35 repeat visitors (29.9 percent) and 82 first-time visitors (70.1 percent). Regarding the type of concern, 68 of patients or 58.1 percent had a functional concern while 49 patients or 41.9 percent had an aesthetic concern (Fenko & Loock, 2014).
Results: Fenko and Loock (2014) found that when each of the environmental factors are used separately – that is, scent and music – they substantially decreased the level of anxiety of the patient in comparison to the control condition. Even so, the combination of music and scent was ineffective in reducing the levels of anxiety. Discussion: the article has a comprehensive discussion section. The findings indicate that ambient music and scent could be helpful in reducing anxiety of the patients who are waiting to undergo plastic surgery. Nonetheless, these two environmental factors have to be utilized cautiously. This is because the addition of more ambient elements to the environment can increase the patient’s arousal level and in so doing increase their levels of anxiety (Fenko & Loock, 2014). References: a total of 75 references were used in this article. The references are from the year 1982 to 2012, but there is one from 1906 and most were published in past 8 years. All the reference materials are relevant to the topic of the study.
B Research Overview
Question 5: hypothesis and research question
The research questions are: what are the effects of relaxing music and scent utilized in combination and separately on patient’s anxiety level, perceived waiting time, and evaluation of the waiting env...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!