100% (1)
page:
6 pages/≈1650 words
Sources:
5
Style:
APA
Subject:
Education
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 34.45
Topic:

Equity Audit Tool

Research Paper Instructions:
The purpose of an Equity Audit Tool is to assist you, as a leader for positive social change, in recognizing significant and persistent patterns of inequity within your locality, school, or workplace. To prepare for this Assignment review the module reading “Equity Audits: A Practical Leadership Tool for Developing Equitable and Excellent Schools.” Instructions: Your Equity Audit Tool must address the following three dimensions as they relate to your locality, school, or workplace: Dimension 1: Teacher/Educator Quality Equity Possible indicators include: Mobility Master’s + Average Experience Not Certified Dimension 2: Programmatic Equity Possible indicators include: Special Education Gifted & Talented Education Bilingual Education Student Discipline Dimension 3: Achievement Equity Possible indicators include: 5) State achievement test results 6) Dropout rates 7) High school graduation tracks 8) SAT/ACT/AP/IB results Note: The dimensions and indicators above may differ depending on the learning context. For the purposes of this assignment, use the three dimensions identified. You may vary the indicators under each dimension as long as there is a data source from which to analyze culturally responsive practices. Your paper should include the following five sections: Section 1: Introduction Describe your learning context [school or work site] (e.g., the teacher/educator staffing structure, programs offered, and how achievement is measured). Section 2: Teacher Quality Equity Identify a minimum of three data and indicator sources available in your learning context [school or work site] that provide meaningful information about teacher quality equity. Explain when and how each of the data sources is collected and how each is an indicator of culturally responsive education practices relevant to your specific context[ school or work site]. Use and cite the literature and Learning Resources from this module and your own readings. Section 3: Programmatic Equity Identify a minimum of three data and indicator sources available in your learning context that provide meaningful information about program equity. Explain when and how each of the data sources is collected. Briefly explain how each is an indicator of culturally responsive education practices relevant to your specific context [school or work site]. Use and cite the literature and Learning Resources from this module, and your own readings, in your response. Section 4: Achievement Equity Identify a minimum of three data and indicator sources available in your learning context that provide meaningful information about achievement equity. Explain when and how each of the data sources is collected. Briefly explain how each is an indicator of culturally responsive education practices relevant to your specific context. Use and cite the literature and Learning Resources from this module, and your own readings, in your response. Section 5: Operationalizing Equity Audits Describe how you would approach each of the following six steps for operationalizing your equity audit in your context (Skrla et al., 2010): 1. Creating a committee of relevant stakeholders. 2. Presenting the data to the committee and have everyone graph the data. 3. Discussing the meaning of the data, possible use of experts, led by a facilitator. 4. Discussing potential solutions, possible use of experts, led by a facilitator. 5. Implementing solution(s). 6. Monitoring and evaluating results. Section 6: Reflection Explain what you learned from developing your Equity Audit Tool. How might you apply this learning in your current and future practice as a change leader? What advice, based on what you learned, might you give to other change leaders? What challenges do you foresee in the work you hope to do as a leader committed to positive social change? What ways might you modify the Equity Audit Tool to meet the needs of your context while maintaining its purpose of recognizing significant and persistent patterns of inequity? Paper length requirement: ­5–7 pages
Research Paper Sample Content Preview:
Equity Audit Tool Student’s Name Institution Course Instructor Date Section 1: Introduction Educational equity balances learning outcomes and allows every learner to excel regardless of background. My previous workplace was a school district, and our team oversaw operations in many schools in a remote area. Most students came from low socioeconomic backgrounds, and the schools often needed help to finance their learning activities adequately. There were very few seasoned professionals with advanced degrees, and most teachers employed were newer educators. Apart from the normal school programs, specialized programs like special education, gifted and talented education, and bilingual education were also offered. A combination of standardized testing, classroom assessments, and performance-based evaluations assessed achievement in the school district. The equity audit tool examines three key dimensions that impact educational equity: teacher/educator quality equity, programmatic equity, and achievement equity. Section 2: Teacher Quality Equity Examining teacher quality equity offers valuable insights into the stability and effectiveness of the teaching workforce within this educational setting. Teachers are key figures in guiding students in the curricular and co-curricular activities. Their efforts in the school environment greatly impact students' lives. Information about teacher quality from this learning context can be deduced from teacher mobility, the percentage of teachers with advanced degrees (Master’s or more), and the average experience of teachers (Skrla et al., 2004). Teacher mobility refers to the rate at which teachers enter and exit a particular school or district (Palma-Vasquez et al., 2022). There is data on transfers from the school to other districts or schools, leaving the profession, and retiring. High mobility rates can disrupt the continuity of instruction and negatively affect student achievement. Having worked in a low-socioeconomic region, the main factors contributing to high teacher mobility rates were poor working conditions and inadequate support systems. This indicates that teacher mobility rates can be reduced by addressing underlying issues in the school culture, like lack of competitive salaries and poor working conditions. The average experience level of teachers and the percentage of teachers who hold advanced degrees are key factors determining students' quality of education. Teachers with more experience are better equipped to deliver knowledge and navigate challenges in the school. There were few experienced teachers in the school district, which can be attributed to the constant transfer to better schools or private learning institutions (Palma-Vasques et al., 2022). Most teachers in the school district were in their second and third year of teaching experience; hence, they needed help delivering high-quality instruction to students. Moreover, teachers with advanced degrees were only two and were mostly tasked with administrative duties. This meant the school needed more teachers with specialized knowledge and training to enhance instructional practices. The presence of teachers with advanced degrees in a school is a strong indicator of the school’s capacity to deliver culturally responsive education. The school often struggled to adhere to cultural competence, diversity, and inclusivity. Section 3: Programmatic Equity Examining programmatic equity is needed to ensure that educational programs are equitable, distributed, and implemented within a learning context. Data sources informing stakeholders about a learning institution's pragmatic equity include special education, gifted and talented education, and bilingual education (Skrla et al., 2004). Special education programs are designed to support children with disabilities in their learning pursuits (Wyeth et al., 2023). Every individual has a unique development path from childhood, and school districts should strive to address the challenges of every student. Data on special education can be collected by assessing the quality and quantity of resources utilized to meet the unique learning needs of this population. The school district conducted annual meetings to discuss the progress in special education throughout the year. In these meetings, educators, parents, and specialists jointly analyzed data on students' academic and behavioral outcomes in special education programs. Equitable implementation of special education programs in learning institutions strongly indicates culturally responsive education. Disability should not be an obstacle that hinders talented children from achieving their aspirations in life. Bilingual education and gifted and talented education are two other areas that can inform the programmatic equity of a learning institution. Bilingual Education programs support learners who are English Language Learners (ELLs) by offering instruction using both their native language and English (Skrla et al., 2004). The learning institu...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!