Do You Agree that Sexual Rights are Politicized?

Do You Agree that Sexual Rights are Politicized? 

What is your understanding of sexual rights, and do you agree that sexual rights are politicized? Justify your answer by drawing on relevant materials.
Despite decades of fierce discussion, there has never been political unanimity on the phrase "sexual rights." The cause of opposition is countries' claims to drastically differing understandings (and concerns) of what "sexual rights" comprise and potentially tie them to. Because individuals in power regularly utilize sexual rights to influence and manipulate people's behavior, sexual rights have become political. For example, in many countries throughout the globe, same-sex partnerships are illegal, restricting people's capacity to openly express their sexuality and placing them in danger of discrimination, violence, and even death. Furthermore, sexual rights are often invoked to legitimize harsh regimes, such as anti-LGBT legislation in Russia and Nigeria. The state has utilized sexual rights to restrict and repress minority populations in both situations.
Without intervention from the state or any other third party, every individual has the inherent freedom to decide how they will engage in sexual activity and parent their offspring. Sexual rights are essential because they assist in guaranteeing that individuals can live their lives in a manner free from discrimination, violence, and oppression. There should be the freedom of expression. Sexual rights are important. People should not worry about being persecuted or discriminated against to discuss or investigating their sexual orientation or gender identity. Those in authority will often use sexual and reproductive rights as a weapon to subjugate and dominate members of underrepresented groups. Without intervention from the state or any other third party, every individual has the inherent freedom to decide how they will engage in sexual activity and parent their offspring. It is essential to protect people's sexual rights because doing so makes it more likely that they will be able to live their life in a manner that is free from discrimination, abuse, and oppression.[Caleb Orozco v. Attorney General of Belize, Claim No. 668 of 2010 (2016). Available at:  /wp-content/uploads/resources/Judgment-Orozco-v-The-Attorney-General-of-Belize.pdf ]
How are markers of inclusion and exclusion reinforced in mainstream sexual and reproductive rights movements/discussions?
The markers of inclusion and exclusion are often reinforced in public conversations and activities around sexual and reproductive rights. For instance, one of the primary concerns in many industrialized nations, including the United States, is ensuring that women have access to contraceptive and abortion services. However, there is often very little debate regarding the requirements of other groups, such as those who identify as LGBTQ+, people who work in the sexual exploitation industry, and people who are disabled. This exclusion may be perceived as propagating the belief that certain people do not deserve the same rights and protections as the rest of society. This exclusion may be perceived as bearing the idea that certain people do not deserve the same rights and protections as the rest of the community. [Human Rights Watch. "Colombia: Women Face Prison For Abortion". Human Rights Watch. (2005). /news/2005/06/26/colombia-women-face-prison-abortion.]
Why May this be the Case?
The concepts of sexual and reproductive rights are subsumed under the umbrella term of human rights. Moral concepts primarily concerned with the treatment and rights of the human species are referred to as human rights. In the context of a more comprehensive framework for human rights, sexual and reproductive rights are more politically fraught than other types of rights. This is because human rights are concerned with human beings. Some people believe that the right to control one's sexuality and reproduction lays the groundwork for all other rights, including political and civil rights. This is because for human beings to exercise additional rights, they need to be able to control their sexuality and reproduction. Others contend that all human rights are inextricably linked to one another and mutually reinforce one another.
According to studies from the United Nations, women and girls living in developing nations are susceptible to various sexual and reproductive rights abuses. They are compelled to marry before 18, which is against the law. In Nepal, 34 000 young girls under the age of 15 are married, while in Afghanistan, more than 90 percent of brides are under 16. Girls who get pregnant due to sexual assault might face serious legal consequences in Colombia. Girls and women in Malawi are coerced into having sexual encounters with males in positions of authority in return for food and other necessities.[UNICEF, and UNFPA. "Ending Child Marriage In Nepal". Unicef.Org. (2017). /nepal/reports/ending-child-marriage-nepal.] [UNICEF, and UNFPA. "Ending Child Marriage In Nepal". Unicef.Org. (2017). /nepal/reports/ending-child-marriage-nepal.]
In addition, females face discrimination due to laws and policies, such as the one that the government of India passed in 2005 that allows parents to demand a dowry of up to several thousand dollars, which is then paid to the family of the lady who is being married. It is possible for a woman to be an outcast from society and deemed unfit for marriage if she cannot pay her debts. In addition, the dowry system raises the risk of domestic violence and abuse by making it more likely that an unwed woman would be forced to pay a dowry, which may result in sexual assault or rape if the payment is not made. In addition, the system reinforces the notion that a woman's value is proportional to the degree to which her potential husband finds her beautiful. Some of the women from India belonged to ...