100% (1)
page:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
-1
Style:
Harvard
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:

Portfolios Units 2 And 3 Assessment Specification Document Essay

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

You must submit a portfolio of summary of notes or reflections on each session (150

words for each session, excluding references).

Together, the portfolios for the three units are worth 10% of the mark for the module.

The deadline for Portfolios 2 and 3 is Monday 8 June at 2pm.

The late submission cut-off deadline is Monday 22 June at 2pm

Your task:

For each session, you must select ONE piece of material (reading or video) to write

about. If the session has two or more pieces of materials, you must choose a single

one.

For each material/week you must write 150 words covering the following questions:

▪ What was the topic of the material?

▪ What were the key arguments made by the material’s author?

The total word limit for the portfolio is 150 words per session, in a total of 1500

words for both Units 2 and 3.

Guidance on assessment preparation and submission:

You must write approximately the number of words given in the word limit. You may

go up to 10% over this limit and are not advised to go more than 10% under it.

You must state the number of the week and the material you have selected to write

about on the top of each reflection. See example below:

WEEK 1 State the week number clearly

Selected material: Walter, D. (2017), Colonial Violence:

European Empires and the Use of Force. London: Hurst & Co.

Reference to your

selected material

using Harvard

referencing system

The text shows that the westerner armies and settlers that

encountered the non-western peoples of Africa, Asia and the

Americas, did not initiate and enact these contacts as tabula

rasa: They went into them armed with ideas of their own civilised

nature, of the way these indigenous peoples would behave and

of how this contact would inevitably develop. Thus, they made

the ‘savage’ behave savagely by treating him as one. In fact, it

is highly likely that even if the ‘savage’ had not behaved

savagely at all, the westerners would just have seen all this as

a cunning trick, and then acted just as they did in reality. All this

chronic misinterpretation of non-western peoples provides

ample evidence of the usefulness of Edward Said’s view of how

the western mind related to the non-western world, which he

categorised as orientalism and which unfortunately has not

vanished from the west.

Write your text

below. This part

should have no

more than 150

words.

 

Contemporary Global Issues: Approaches in Social Science, History and Philosophy (SSSS002S3) 1 PORTFOLIOS Units 2 and 3 ASSESSMENT SPECIFICATION DOCUMENT You must submit a portfolio of summary of notes or reflections on each session (150 words for each session, excluding references). Together, the portfolios for the three units are worth 10% of the mark for the module. The deadline for Portfolios 2 and 3 is Monday 8 June at 2pm. The late submission cut-off deadline is Monday 22 June at 2pm Your task: For each session, you must select ONE piece of material (reading or video) to write about. If the session has two or more pieces of materials, you must choose a single one. For each material/week you must write 150 words covering the following questions: ▪ What was the topic of the material? ▪ What were the key arguments made by the material’s author? The total word limit for the portfolio is 150 words per session, in a total of 1500 words for both Units 2 and 3. Guidance on assessment preparation and submission: You must write approximately the number of words given in the word limit. You may go up to 10% over this limit and are not advised to go more than 10% under it. You must state the number of the week and the material you have selected to write about on the top of each reflection. See example below: Contemporary Global Issues: Approaches in Social Science, History and Philosophy (SSSS002S3) 2 WEEK 1 State the week number clearly Selected material: Walter, D. (2017), Colonial Violence: European Empires and the Use of Force. London: Hurst & Co. Reference to your selected material using Harvard referencing system The text shows that the westerner armies and settlers that encountered the non-western peoples of Africa, Asia and the Americas, did not initiate and enact these contacts as tabula rasa: They went into them armed with ideas of their own civilised nature, of the way these indigenous peoples would behave and of how this contact would inevitably develop. Thus, they made the ‘savage’ behave savagely by treating him as one. In fact, it is highly likely that even if the ‘savage’ had not behaved savagely at all, the westerners would just have seen all this as a cunning trick, and then acted just as they did in reality. All this chronic misinterpretation of non-western peoples provides ample evidence of the usefulness of Edward Said’s view of how the western mind related to the non-western world, which he categorised as orientalism and which unfortunately has not vanished from the west. Write your text below. This part should have no more than 150 words. You must write all parts of the assessment in a single document, written using Arial font size 12pt and margins of 2.54cm on all sides of the document (tip: use ‘normal’ margins settings from Word). This document must be formatted as a Word document or as a PDF and uploaded to Moodle via the ‘Turnitin’ icon labelled with the title of the assessment (i.e. ‘Portfolio Unit 2 and 3 Group X, due date 8 June 2020, 2pm’. You can find this under the ‘Assessment’ heading in the Moodle module. Please make sure you allow plenty of time to prepare for this assessment in order to submit it by the deadline. It is advisable to give yourself enough time to complete your answers, then set your work aside for a day or two before going back and checking and, if necessary, revising it. Remember that all written material you submit as part of the assessment must be your own. Make sure you acknowledge the source of any material (articles, books, videos, website, etc) you use by using references. Presenting another person's ideas or words in such a way that they could be assumed to be your own is understood as Contemporary Global Issues: Approaches in Social Science, History and Philosophy (SSSS002S3) 3 plagiarism, which is an Assessment Offense. For guidelines on how to avoid plagiarism see: http://www.bbk.ac.uk/student-services/exams/plagiarism-guidelines. You will find more information on Assessment Offenses in the SSHP FY Handbook. By submitting the coursework you will be automatically agreeing with the following statement: I have read and understood the section of the handbook that explains plagiarism. I testify that, unless otherwise acknowledged, the work submitted herein is entirely my own. Please be aware that we will be taking into account clarity of expression and communicative ability when we mark your work, so make every effort to write clear and accurate English. Here are the marking criteria we will use when assessing your work: ▪ Completeness of portfolio ▪ Relevance of answer to the questions ▪ Clarity of expression and communicative ability ▪ Referencing Late submissions Late submissions will be allowed until the absolute cut-off deadline, listed above. Late submissions will be capped at pass mark (40%) if the work is of pass standard unless you had a Mitigating Circumstances claim accepted by your department. Submissions received after the absolute cut-off deadline will NOT be accepted. College regulations do not allow members of staff to grant extensions on assessments, but if your submission is late due to unforeseen and unpreventable circumstances, you can submit a Mitigating Circumstances claim. Mitigating Circumstances claims should be submitted to your programme administrator within two weeks of the submission deadline. If your claim is accepted, your late submission will not be penalised. Marks and Feedback Marks and feedback will be released to students via Moodle 4 weeks after the submission deadline. Students will normally be notified by email.

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:
Portfolios Units 2 And 3 Assessment Specification Document
Student’s Name
Course
Professor
Affiliation
City
State
Date
UNIT 2: WEEK 7
Selected Material: Berda, Y., 2013, September. Managing dangerous populations: colonial legacies of security and surveillance. In Sociological Forum (Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 627-630).
Summary
This article aims to discuss some of the surveillance techniques that have been undertaken in the last decade based on Western modernity. Berda asserts that past practices have shown that movement surveillance in Europe and North America are mainly related to citizenship. Some of the major roles of the surveillance technologies are to control certain groups such as refugees, intruders, illegal aliens, and migrant workers. Notably, the practice of using surveillance technologies to monitor and control populations began during colonial times. During the time, most colonial masters often treated subject populations in their territories as inferiors. Since violence did not work, most colonial regimes resulted in the use of documentation and surveillance to control their subjects. The trend of using surveillance to control population was also witnessed during the two world wars. Notably, in the U.S., the 9/11 attack also increased the use of surveillance to control populations rather than secure territories.
UNIT 2: WEEK 8
Selected Material: Manton, K. (2019), ‘The Politics of Fingerprinting in Britain, c1880-1936’.
Summary
In the 1890s, there was the establishment of approaches such as bertillonism, photography, and fingerprinting to identify habitual criminals. However, by the beginning of the 20th century, bertillonism had been abandoned, and fingerprinting was the main identification approach. The approach was also criticized, and this led to the use of tell-tale marks from the vaccination program. Several years, this approach was abandoned before being adopted again and later abandoned after it was argued that the marks were not distinctive enough. In this sense, this reading seeks to illustrate to readers some of the oldest approaches used in Britain to identify people and deal with criminal elements in societies. Another approach was the fingerprinting suffragist prisoners to help differentiate between criminals based on the number of crimes they had committed in the past. There was the introduction of fingerprints, which were used to identify foreigners who had applied for naturalization. In this sense, the reading focuses on how several approaches, such as fingerprinting, were used in identifying people in British society.
UNIT 2: WEEK 9
Selected Material: Graham-Harrison, E. and Garside, J. (2019), 'Allow no escapes': leak exposes the reality of China's vast prison camp network, The Guardian. /world/2019/nov/24/china-cables-leak-no-escapes-reality-china-uighur-prison-camp
Summary
The authors of this article focus on the Chinese internment camps, which have been used as the detention of more than one million people who belong to the country's Muslim minorities. The article is based on leaked documents, which indicate that the Chinese government has been involved in the mass incarceration of Chinese from Muslim minorities. The leakages sent to different media outlets have been proved to be authentic despite the Chinese government terming them as being fabricated. The documents are in line with ever-present evidence that China has secret detention camps whereby people are involuntarily placed to achieve ideological "education transformation." Although Chinese officials have often denied the existence of detention camps, there is evidence that these centers are available and that most people placed are Uighurs and other ethnic minorities. More several satellite photos and tales from former detainees have illustrated the existence of the detention camps.
UNIT 2: WEEK 10
Selected Material: Alan Travis (2009), 'Lords: rise of CCTV is a threat to freedom,' The Guardian. Available at/uk/2009/feb/06/surveillance-freedom-peers
Summary
The article seeks to illustrate that the continued high prevalence of CCTV is a threat to freedom. In essence, Alan asserts that the House of Lords has identified the use of CCTV as a "surveillance society," which tends to deny people their right to privacy. According to the article, Britain is one of the countries that have invested heavily in technologically advanced surveillance systems to help fight terrorism and crime. More so, the country has been identified as being the leading user of CCTVs with an estimated four million cameras. In this regard, the article states that continued surveillance systems have significantly affected individuals' freedom and right to privacy. In this regard, several recommendations have been made to ensure that surveillance systems uphold individual privacy. In this regard, the article aims to ensure that one's right to privacy is upheld despite the need to enhance security by the use of technologically advanced surveillance systems.
UNIT 2: WEEK 11
Selected Material: Stephanie Hare (August 2019), ‘Facial recognitions is now rampant. The implications forour freedoms are chilling’, The Guardian. /commentisfree/2019/aug/18/facial-recognition-is-now-rampant-implications-for-our-freedom-are-chilling
Summary
Stephanie highlights that use of facial recognition has become preval...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!