Fraudulent Reporting

Fraudulent Reporting
Institutional Affiliation
Course Code
Student ID
Lecturer’s Names
Date
Fraudulent Reporting
Introduction
The fraudulent billing reporting scenario may appear advantageous for the employees and the business, but carrying it out will compromise standards of practice at a professional level. The fact is that Scott's agreement to cut back on overtime pay will benefit the business, its employees, clients, and patrons because it will result in more bids. Scott is split between two competing concerns on whether or not to agree to a reduction in the number of billable hours. Professional ethics and structures are important in various professional structures. Underreporting billable hours that have been charged by the employees is against the corporation's policy. Accounting firms that offer low billable hours are striking and attractive to prospective customers considering that a bid with the lowermost total complete cost will get the deal. If the employees report a smaller amount of hours than expected, the company will appear more attractive and will possibly get the contract deal. The "utilization metric" used to assess an employee's productivity puts pressure on you to report reduced billable hours. Due to a better utilization rate, workers who report fewer hours than their counterparts will be viewed as more effective. Scott recalls a situation where one of his coworkers received a promotion due to his incredibly high usage rate. He knows that recording his actual working hours might put him at a disadvantage for the end-of-year performance assessment. Scott runs the risk of losing the upper hand over his coworkers, who almost all engage in underbilling if he records all of his billable hours per company regulation. Although Scott is uneasy with the practice, he worries that his prospects could be better.
Q 1. Critically evaluate the fraudulent reporting case using normative ethical theories
The fraudulent reporting scenario may appear advantageous for the employees and the business, but carrying it out will compromise professional standards. The truth is that Scott's agreement to cut back on overtime pay will benefit the business, its employees, clients, and patrons because it will result in more bids. Scott is split between two competing concerns on whether or not to agree to a reduction in the number of billable hours. A deontologist will contend that Scott shouldn't act this way and should stick to his guns about not letting it impact his billable hours to keep things as they are. It focuses on the connection between duty and the morality of human actions for philosophical deontological ethics. Deontological integrity embraces that an action is morally good not just because the activity results in a good act. However, because of some characteristics of the action itself. Yes, the action may be advantageous to the business, but it is awful and unethical when it comes to professional problems for Scott. Similar to this, a virtue ethic will insist that Scott behave professionally and uphold the standards of conduct for his position (Christie, Groarke & Sweet 2014). Aristotle created this school of thought and other ancient Greeks, based it on the idea that it is character-based morally and that morality is a skill we acquire via experiences. By practicing virtues like generosity, justice, bravery, honesty, charity, and so on, one develops an honorable and moral character (Greetham, 2016). If Scott continues to do that, he will be free to act morally and refrain from doing anything that would violate the company's code of conduct.
A utilitarian individual will centrally counsel Scott to accept and decrease the overtime pay. This is due to utilitarianism, an ethical philosophy that differentiates between good and wrong by highlighting consequences (Stuart Mill, 2015). It exemplifies and embraces consequentialism in some way. According to relativism, the decision that ends up in the greatest good for the highest number of employees happens to be the morally correct one. Changing the billable hours will undoubtedly benefit the business and the workforce. Utilitarianism holds that a course of action is good if it nurtures contentment and is observed and considered as good by most, and it is bad if it results in unhappiness for many while instigating or triggering pleasure for a few (Christie, Groarke & Sweet 2014). Professional ethics are crucial in this situation; A professional code of conduct is meant to ensure that employees are conducting themselves civilly and respectably. As a result, it establishes behavioral standards and informs every staff that complete compliance is required. One needs to sustain moral standards if one would want to be able to help a stranger, keep to his words, and able to tell the truth. An ethical framework obliges as people’s guide for daily decisions, as well as guiding people to prevent unfair consequences or results and to make choices that will fortunately help and benefit society.
Professional ethics are vital because they allow a person to identify with others and circumstances that arise daily. They ensure that people follow codes of ethics regarding their relationships and business dealings in the workplace. For instance, Scott can assert that changing the billable hours will impair his professional principles, thanks to professional ethics. This is a perfect illustration of professional ethics because it serves to protect the reputation and face of both the individual and the entire organization. Assuring clients that professional services will be provided in accordance with acceptably high standards and moral behavior is one of the functions of professional ethics (Hursthouse & Crisp, 2013). Professionals can make decisions that affect customers with a fair amount of independence because of this confidence. Professional ethics direct one's or a group's conduct in a professional situation. Similar to values, professional integrity provides recommendations for how one should act toward other individuals and entities in such a context. These are the guiding ideas Scott uses to resolve the moral conundrum he is experiencing at work.
Academics, Auditors, and Companies need to intensify their focus on improving internal controls as a means of discouraging such unethical activities in reaction to several recent cases involving materially misstated financial information resulting from fraudulent financial reporting. Stronger rules may inadvertently encourage the very opportunistic conduct they are meant to prevent, according to a prior study. There is a need to determine whether the effectiveness of a control that has been applied depends not only on how powerful the control is, stronger or weaker but also on how the company frames the control's objective of coordinating and monitoring (Stuart Mill, 2015). At the same time, a coordinating objective frame controls enhancing coordination between the firm and its managers. A monitoring purpose frames controls as decreasing managers' possibilities to engage in self-interested activity. According to several studies, the control frame determines how effective greater controls are at reducing unethical fake reporting. The interactive impact of control strength and control frame on managers' judgments to disclose fraud has to be examined via an experiment. According to numerous findings, stronger controls than weaker controls lead to less fraudulent reporting when controls are presented for monitoring and tracking purpose (Hursthouse & Crisp, 2013). Better controls, as opposed to weaker controls, produce more bogus reporting when designed for coordination objectives. Various findings imply that the effectiveness of the applied control to prevent unethical reporting behaviors is diminished by a discrepancy between the firm's decision on the control strength and the control frame. Additionally, the additional study demonstrates that managers' justifications contribute to the explanation of the interactive relationship between control strength and conveyed control purpose on fraudulent reporting.
A framework for making decisions specifically developed. Making a choice is difficult in this situation since Scott must weigh all of the probable outcomes of the ethical conundrum before choosing what is best to do. To reach that assumption, Scott should apply a decision-making framework that would aid him in reaching a sound judgment. The first thing Scott needs to do is recognize and admit the moral dilemma (Hursthouse & Crisp, 2013). Scott should think about whether or not the decision to be taken will be demanding to anyone or a particular group in light of the current circumstances. He should also assess if his choice was excellent or terrible in light of two opposing factors. After recognizing the problem, Scott needs to learn why they are demanding that he cut back on billable hours and their true goals. Or is it not a trap? Does he have enough information to make a judgment, or is there a hidden agenda that I can discover? The following step, which involves analyzing potential courses of action, will follow this evaluation. Scott should consider which alternative is the finest and salutates the rights of everyone who has a stale and which choice treats all people equally, like in the above situation (Christie, Groarke & Sweet 2014). After that, Scott is free to choose a course of action and test it by thinking about the best strategy for handling the circumstance. Scott can then think about the decisions' results and take appropriate action.
Scott needs to make the appropriate decision and move. He should consider the course of accomplishment that benefits the organization the best. Of course, if he settles on or cuts back on billable hours, it will benefit both the business and the workers. However, because he is a professional, he must abide by moral principles and professional standards. In this instance, changing the billable hours would violate honesty and be unethical because the employees have faith in him and the entire business depends on him. Fraud has in the past disgraced many successful businesses. Its existence still threatens the prosperity of businesses. Fraudulent reporting occurs due to a conflict of interests between the principal and the agent. Fraudulent reporting can also be encouraged by pressures experienced by employees either in their personal lives, like debt, medical expenses, etc.. or through the structure of the company itself. Some companies pursue a highly competitive bottom-line-oriented target model. Lack of focus on ethical or environmental aspects of operations encourages fraud in corporations.
The opportunity created by a lack of internal controls in a company or misplaced trust is a key element in fraud’s occurrence. Rationalization is another factor of fraudulent behavior. Unethical employees may believe in their entitlement to something they are fraudulen...