100% (1)
page:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
1
Style:
Chicago
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:

Biomedical ethics

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:
In the purple picture it's the case study and all of the screenshots provided are the questions that need to be answered. If possible when sending it back can you please number them so i know which answer goes to the correct question. Also can be written in your own words. Instructions: You will respond to each of the questions below in your own words. This assignment is to be completed independently. This is not a research assignment. Do not use any secondary literature for this assignment. You are only required to use course materials (our textbook, readings, Blackboard Modules). Carefully read and review the case study above. The questions to follow will center on this particular case and will ask you to apply various concepts, arguments, and readings we have completed to the case in order to develop a philosophical argument on what we should do to solve some of the moral problems raised. You are expected to write in clear, complete sentences with proper grammar and spelling. In some answers, you might include paragraphs. If so, ensure that each paragraph focuses on a single topic. Be sure to proofread your work carefully. I have included some suggestions for how much you might write for each answer. Overall, you should aim to be brief and concise in your answers. You can use the first person “I” in your answers. This assignment asks you to state and defend your own position on the case study, so I encourage you to use the first person, as it will clarify to the reader what your view is. You are expected to provide a thesis in one of the questions below. A thesis is a short (one sentence), unambiguous statement that tells the reader explicitly what you think. Your thesis should communicate to the reader what your view on the case is. Thesis statements often begin with “I argue that…”. I encourage you to use this in your assignment. In a thesis statement, and in your analysis in the other questions, try not to fence-sit. What this means is that you should take a strong position on the moral question the case raises which definitively answers the question, rather than hesitating or going back and forth between what we ought to do. You are expected to defend your thesis in some of your responses to the other questions below. Try to be consistent throughout the case study assignment, meaning that your answers to the questions should ultimately give the reader reason to support your thesis overall. In your answers, use in-text citations formatted according to the Chicago author-date citation system when directly quoting or paraphrasing from the text. Usually, this requires you to cite the author in parentheses, including the publication date and the page number of the source you are citing, e.g., (Smith 2020, 23). Trent’s Academic Skills has a webpage explaining this system here: https://www(dot)trentu(dot)ca/academicskills/documentation-guide/chicago-style/chicago-style-author-date-system. You should focus on paraphrasing rather than using direct quotes. Be sure to explain the text in your own words to demonstrate you understand the material. I will not require a full bibliography or reference list for this assignment. Just in-text citations in your answers. In question number four it asks to touch on a reading from "A Moral Theory of Informed Consent" by Freedman- https://www(dot)jstor(dot)org/stable/3561421
Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:
HILLY BOSSCHER CASE STUDY Name Class Name and Code Date Question 1 Should assisted suicide be permitted for individuals suffering from severe mental illness who are not terminally ill but are experiencing unbearable psychological pain? Question 2 I argue that assisted suicide should be permitted for individuals suffering from severe mental illness who are not terminally ill but are experiencing unbearable psychological pain, provided they are deemed competent to make such a decision. Question 3 Autonomy It is the capacity to make one's own decisions based on personal values and principles, free from external coercion or undue influence. It is literally “self-rule” where an individual exercises rationality and responsibility in their choices (Weijer and Skelton 2019, 64). Autonomy is fundamental to the concept of informed consent, as it ensures that individuals can meaningfully and voluntarily engage in decisions about their own lives and bodies. Competence It is the decision-relative ability of an individual to perform a specific decision-making task under specified conditions and at a particular time (Weijer and Skelton 2019, 58). It involves the capacities of understanding and communication, and deliberation and reasoning (Weijer and Skelton 2019, 59). Competence is not a global trait but varies according to the conditions under which it is made and the nature of the choice, meaning a person may be competent for one decision but not for another, even under similar conditions (Weijer and Skelton 2019, 58). Question 4 Freedman’s personhood, responsibility, and voluntariness discussion provides a useful framework when it comes to evaluating if Ms. Bosscher would be considered an autonomous decision-maker given her case details. Personhood, according to Freedman, involves possessing qualities that make one a moral agent. Including rationality and the capacity to make choices for which one may be held responsible (Weijer and Skelton 2019, 64). This implies that an autonomous decision-maker must demonstrate the ability to make reasoned and informed choices based on their reflective values. Another thing that Freedman emphasizes is responsibility. That a choice must be responsible. Not necessarily judged by the particular decision made, but rather by whether the individual typically makes decisions based on reasons beliefs, or arguments, and remains open to the claims of reason (Weijer and Skelton 2019, 64). Additionally, a decision must be voluntary, meaning it should not be made under coercion or threat that compromises the individual's freedom (Weijer and Skelton 2019, 66). Applying these ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!