Case Brief

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

Assignment Details The appellate process is a cornerstone of a democratic criminal justice system. However, many people are unaware of the process that a case may undergo before it finds itself before the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). In fact, as you have read, not all cases reach the highest court in the land. In this activity, you are going to trace the path of a criminal case from the lower court by identifying the facts of the case, the ruling at the appellate court level, the key legal questions and how they relate to the Constitution, and the ruling in the case as made by the SCOTUS. Complete the following for this assignment: Use this Web site to select cases, and using key terms, select 1 criminal justice-related case that was decided within the last 7 years. You can determine that a case is a criminal case by looking for either the “United States” or the name of a state in the case name. If you do not see the name of a state or “United States” in the name of the case, that means that the case may be a civil case. Avoid selecting a civil case. Also, make sure that you select a case that has been decided by the Court. The case should have a "Decided date" and not list "pending." In order to avoid selecting a "pending case", select an opinion from the previous Court term or earlier and avoid selecting a case from the current term, which runs from October through July of the following year. Click here for a video about how to research and locate a case on the Oyez site. After you select a criminal case, read the case by following these instructions, and then listen to the oral arguments. Provide the following for your case in your own words: A summary of the facts of the case or what happened A summary of the procedural history of the case, or how the lower courts decided the case before it reached the U.S. Supreme Court. Identify the Supreme Court Justice who wrote the majority opinion Identify the key legal questions or issues that were argued before the U.S. Supreme Court Identify the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision or holding (usually one or two words that can be found at the end of the case, such as affirmed, reversed, remanded, vacated). Discuss the Court’s reasoning, or why the Court answered the legal issues in the way that it did. If there are any concurring or dissenting opinions, identify the Justice(s) who wrote the concurring and dissenting opinions and summarize the reasoning of one of these concurring or dissenting opinions. (The concurring opinions, if any, come after the majority opinion, and the dissenting opinions, if any, follow the concurring opinions in the case.) Explain whether you agree or disagree with the Court’s decision in the case, and explain why. Provide a one-paragraph summary of the oral arguments and your impressions of the attorneys’ arguments and the justices’ questions. Also, discuss whether anything surprised you about the oral arguments. List your References, which would be a citation to the case that you are discussing. For this assignment, you may format your paper as a traditional paper using APA style and formatting, or you may format your paper as a case brief. Click here to see a sample case brief. Click here for a case brief template.

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:

Case Brief Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Course Instructor Date Case Brief Citation: Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Facts: Timothy Carpenter was imprisoned for several armed robberies. Throughout the search, the FBI retrieved cell-phone accounts from the offender's wireless carriers, which comprises the location data for 127 days. The FBI used this data to apply for their guidelines from judges to get "transaction records" from the cell-phone, which is approved under the “Stored Communication Act, 18 U.S.C. 2703(d)” (Carpenter v. United States, n.d.). Even though the FBI did not acquire a warrant for the information, they still used it based on standards lower than probable cause. Carpenter contended that obtaining such data without a warrant founded on probable cause to retrieve the accounts violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Procedural History: The offender was sentenced in federal district court, where the Court accepted the retrieved records from the cell phone as evidence for the case. The “Sixth Circuit Appeals” confirmed the arrest, deciding that offender did not have a realistic expectation of privacy in his “cell-site location information” (CSLI) (Carpenter v. United States, n.d.). The accused appealed to the Supreme Court, contending that the acquiring information from his cell phone constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment and, hence, mandatory a warrant. Supreme Court Justice Author: The majority opinion was presented by Chief Justice John Roberts. Question/Issue: Whether the warrantless search and seizure of the offender’s cell phone accounts violates the Fourth Amendment. Deciding/Holding: Reversed Supreme Court’s Reasoning: The Court held that the acquiring information from the offender's cell-site was a Fourth Amendment search. At first, popular view recognized that the “Fourth Amendment safeguards not just the property interests but also reasonable expectations of privacy” (Carpenter v. United States, n.d.). The Court rejected this argument and extended the "third-party doctrine," necessitating that a “third-party have no reasonable expectation of privacy to cell-site location information,” even when it relates to bigger privacy issues than one tracked by the GPS (R...

Updated on August 27, 2024

Get the Whole Paper!

Not exactly what you need?

Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Analyze

4 pages/≈1100 words | 4 Sources | APA | Law | Other (Not Listed) |
Memorandum of Law: Societal Determinations of What Is Criminal

2 pages/≈550 words | 3 Sources | APA | Law | Other (Not Listed) |
Memorandum of Law: Competency & The Criminal Justice System

2 pages/≈550 words | 3 Sources | APA | Law | Other (Not Listed) |