NU 613 Quality Improvement Paper. Health, Medicine, Nursing Essay
For this assignment select a practice improvement issue within your organizational
system and within the realm of your practice area. Using the grading rubric as a
guide, develop a quality improvement plan to address the identified issue. The
purpose of this paper is to demonstrate knowledge of the essential elements of
quality improvement, with change theory as an underpinning for the process.
Do not use a quality intervention plan that has already been implemented for
this assignment; this should be a new plan for the organization with a clear
measurable problem statement and a planned evidence-based intervention.
Students are not expected to implement the plan; however, the process for
implementation and evaluation is addressed as part of the planning process.
The paper should be carefully written in a formal style, based on primary sources,
provide an integration of ideas, and be 6 pages in length, excluding title page,
appendices & reference list.Order of the paper should be Title Page, Body of Paper, Appendix, Reference. Organized flow, logical progression of ideas, and clarity in
thought are essential.
Please use headings consistent with the topic areas of the rubric to separate content.
References must be timely; published within the previous five (5) years. Liberal number
of primary and peer reviewed references (minimum of 10). This paper must
be submitted to Turnitin. You will be allowed to complete revisions in Turnitin until the
due date. The final paper will be submitted in the course assignment area in USAonline.
Deductions:
Papers over the page limit will be penalized by a disregard of content over the page
limit. Scholarship Expectations:
A lack of scholarship deduction of up to 20% of the total point value of the
assignment will be applied to address such deficiencies as APA errors, title or reference
page errors, a lack of clarity and conciseness in writing, grammatical and spelling
errors, exceeding the prescribed page limit, and poor overall writing skills.
For example, an assignment worth 15 points could have a maximum lack of scholarship
deduction of 3 points (20% x 15). The amount of the deduction will be at the discretion
of the faculty member.
You are clinical nurse scholars in the making. You are the nurses with
advanced education/ DNPs and members of the highly literate profession of
advanced practice nursing who will chart the future of health care. Good writing
ability is as much a required skill for nurses in advanced practice as performing
clinical functions. Therefore, precision and scholarship is expected in all
assignments.
Introduction paragraph (one paragraph). Introduce a practice issue
appropriate for a quality improvement project facilitated by a MSN or DNP
prepared nurse. The practice issue should be stated as a clear problem
statement. There must be a thesis statement at the end of the paragraph
that tells the reader the purpose of paper and what will be discussed.
Describe background/context of the identified local measurable practice issue.
Quantify (measure) the local practice concern to establish a baseline for
your work. State a project aim in a single sentence. Use evidence to
further support the concern.
Discuss and apply one theoretical underpinning of change (Lewin, Rogers,
Kotter, Havelock, Prochaska & Diclemente, Bandura) for the proposed
quality initiative. Using the selected change theory, describe the profound
importance of staff engagement, empowerment, commitment, and ownership
of practice improvement initiatives/projects.
Describe how at least one improvement tool (root cause analysis, fishbone
cause and effect diagram, FMEA, etc.) can be used to better understand your
identified practice issue. Describe how to apply the tool to the identified
practice issue to understand and assess the concern before planning an
intervention. Do not describe the solution, describe how you will investigate
the problem using this tool.
Select a model (e.g., PDSA, FADE, Six Sigma, TCAB, TeamSTEPPs) for the
quality improvement project. Describe the model and summarize the practice
improvement initiative/intervention(s) using the steps of the model. This is
the point in the paper where you describe the evidence based intervention
(with citation) based on the problem, background and investigation of the
concern.
Budget: Discuss briefly the revenue or savings associated with the project,
expenses and identify if there will be a return on the investment.
Use the budget template provided with the assignment link to prepare a brief
budget. Attach the completed budget template as an appendix.
Based on Donabedian’s work, identify and describe (a) the structure measures,
(b) the process measures, and (c) the outcomes measures for the quality
improvement intervention(s) for this project.
What qualitative and quantitative measures will be identified to determine
effectiveness of quality initiative? How would qualitative findings contribute
to the evaluation of your specific quality initiative?
Identify and briefly describe at least two visual displays for reporting
outcome data for your selected practice issue (e.g. histogram, run chart, pie
chart, bar graph, etc.).
Conclusions: Summarize the essential points of paper (one paragraph).
Title Page, Reference (reference of at least 10 primary & peer reviews) Page, and Appendix Page (budget template page) does not count as the actual body of the paper which must be 6 pages.
Quality Improvement Process for Standardization of Infant Deliveries in the Operating Room
Name:
NU 613 Quality Improvement Paper
Instructor
Date:
Introduction
Quality improvement of infant deliveries in the operating room is necessary to track the core performance, while monitoring the performance against the best practices. Infants are born in operating room in the case of a cesarean section and in the labor and delivery room if the birth is vaginal (Schorn et al., 2015). The caesarean section is a surgical operation to deliver an infant. Continuous performance improvement is possible when there is understanding how to implement quality improvement practices in the delivery of infants, but are should be exercised to identify the indicators that are most relevant to show the impact of quality improvement (Brady, Bulpitt & Chiarelli, 2014). Even though, hospitals adopt different quality processes, standardization on the quality improvement indicators is important to measure performance and evaluate performance using the indicators and the best evidence available. Patient outcomes and knowledge of the standardization of infant deliveries among healthcare team members before and after 2 months after implementing quality improvement intervention is evaluated.
Background/context
When there is standardization of infant deliveries in the operating room, best practices are adopted to meet clinical needs without compromising the health and safety of the infant and the mother. In the operating and delivery rooms, quality improvement focuses on quality, safety, cost and outcomes The institute of medicine (IOM) Six Domains of Health Care Quality guide quality measurement of health care organizations based on the structure, process or the outcome measures (Almassi & Goldman, 2018). There are various recommendations to improve infant deliveries in the operating room, and while surgical procedures are common, practices and procedures influence outcomes.
Diagnosis and timely management of infant delivery will reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, and the operating room personnel is informed on the best course of action to improve outcomes. Increase in cesarean birth rate, is at times associated with an increase in rates of neonatal morbidity and mortality decisions made on infant delivery in the delivery rooms are clinically justified cases.
Availability of human resources and hospital resources is important to ensure the success of the interventions in operating rooms and it is easier to undertake corrective actions when there are resources. Hospital practices include the use of scorecards or dashboards, to track measure and monitor performance over a period of time based on certain performance indicators (Maturo et al., 2017). The general objective is to provide clinical recommendations based on the best scientific evidence on quality improvement of infant deliveries in the operating room. Operating room performance measures are hospital-centric and patient-centric, based on the quality improvement considerations (Lapcharoensap, 2017).
Theory of change
Kurt Lewin proposed a three-phase change management model, he parallels the process of change in ice and the three phases are: Unfreezing-Change-Freezing. This model guides the process of change so that it takes place in an orderly manner, and proper preparation to implement the change (Cummings, Bridgman & Brown, 2016). Unfreezing occurs where here is a need to change including practices and beliefs that impede growth. This first stage presents numerous challenges because of resistance to change the negative and positive factors affecting goal achievement, and then there is readiness to integrate changes.
After the change of beliefs and practices the next step is change and even when there is lack of experience, relying on standards and protocols guides the team when taking action. Uncertainty and fear of the unknown affect implementing changes, but changes in the practices and beliefs must come from within rather than being imposed. Having change agents who champion change, lead the way and support change makes it easier for others to integrate changes.
In the freezing stage, when the new practices are implemented they must become part of the new culture of the organization so that they guarantee their long-term success (Cummings, Bridgman & Brown, 2016). The changes become routine and to consolidate these changes, rewards system can be used to motivate the health practitioners to implement the changes successfully. It is also necessary for the change agents to communicate about the benefits that the change will bring to the organization so that health care team workers feel part of that improvement process. Change will be reinforced to ensure organizational change.
Improvement tools
Root cause analysis is a sequential process of structured questions to discover underlying causes of an adverse event. The root cause is the fundamental reason or reasons that explain the failure of a situation where the performance does not meet the expected requirements or there is inefficiency of the care process. In this case, it is the lack of standardization of infant deliveries in the operational room. Root cause-analysis is oriented to the process, so it associated with exhaustive review of the elements that affect the event including the people, equipment, procedures, information, environments and external contingencies. The root cause analysis approach also requires recommendations to improve outcomes and to prevent deterioration in outcomes, it also useful to support participation in the care process. Systematically root-cause analysis is most beneficial when there is evidence of results to make conclusions, and the likelihood of recurrence of adverse events/sentient is prevented.
The fishbone cause and effect diagram is also a useful tool in quality improvements where information on current hospital policies and procedures on infant deliveries is collected. This is linked to implementing changes and organizational culture to improve outcomes where the causes are linked to the effects (Cox & Sandberg, 2018). The cause and effect tool analyzes problems by representing the relationship between an effect (problem) and all the possible causes, where the aim is to ensure that there is standardization of the infant delivery process. Thus, identifying the causes of the problem and classifying them to determine the best way to improve outcomes. The data to be collected is how people, policies, processes and systems affect efficiency in the operating room (OR) where the information is then organized and visualized with focus on the contributing factors to the issue (O’Rourke-Suchoff et al., 2016).
Six Sigma model for the quality improvement project
The Six Sigma methodology provides a structured approach to eliminate "defects" in a process, and the structured approach entails a measurable reduction in costs, quality, efficiency and overall improvement. When the principles of Six Sigma are applied in health care settings the tool helps in eliminating defects and variations in processes, simplifying procedures, reducing costs, improving patient care and the overall results (Deblois & Lepanto, 2016). Thus, adopting and implementing the Six Sigma management tool help to improve the quality of care and reduce waste and this is necessary to achieve the set goals. It is expected that there will be effective performance improvements when the Six Sigma tool is used.
Using the structured methodology for problem solving will help to improve standardization of infant deliveries in the operating room. The Six Sigm...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
The cause of Lung Damage from Vaping. Health & Medicine Essay
2 pages/≈550 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Other (Not Listed) |
-
Chronic Obtrusive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Health & Medicine Essay
5 pages/≈1375 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Other (Not Listed) |
-
Exploring Values and Beliefs: Journal Health, Medicine, Nursing Essay
6 pages/≈1650 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Other (Not Listed) |