Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs)
Assessment Description
Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750-word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.
PICOT Question
Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.
The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).
Research Critiques
In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research critiques on two articles for each type of study (four articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.
The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.
Use the "Research Critiques and PICOT Question Guidelines - Final Draft" document to organize your essay. Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper. Please note that there are two new additional sections: Outcomes Comparison and Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change.
General Requirements
You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.Researc
Research Critique: Final Draft
Student's Name
College/University
Course
Professor's Name
Due Date
Introduction
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) persist as a persistent hurdle within the healthcare landscape, resulting in heightened patient morbidity, prolonged hospitalizations, and increased healthcare expenditures. Effectively combating CAUTIs necessitates a multifaceted strategy that extends beyond clinical protocols to encompass non-clinical facets of patient care. This essay delves deeply into the crucial involvement of nurse-led initiatives in CAUTI prevention, utilizing insights from the previously appraised quantitative and qualitative research investigations. The overarching goal of this analysis is to meticulously dissect, amalgamate, and establish correlations across these studies, ultimately coming up with effective ways of curbing CAUTIs. The PICOT question is: "In post-acute care unit adult patients, are nurse-led initiative interventions compared to standard clinical interventions likely to reduce CAUTIs rate and incidence in six months?"
Background Studies
Atkins et al. (2020)
The study explores the intricate realm of CAUTI prevention by examining the barriers and facilitators within healthcare behavior. The research unveils the complexity of altering healthcare practices by focusing on behavioral analysis. The study recognizes that preventing CAUTIs extends beyond clinical protocols, necessitating multifaceted interventions spanning diverse dimensions. By delving into the depths of healthcare behavior change, this article reinforces that successful prevention strategies require a comprehensive understanding of the intricate interplay between individual motivations, institutional support, and contextual influences.
Mota and Oliveira (2019)
In pursuing a comprehensive understanding of CAUTI prevention, this study meticulously investigates the gaps in clinical practice. With a particular focus on patient education, catheter care, and healthcare professionals' adherence to established guidelines, the research sheds light on critical aspects of CAUTI prevention that are often overlooked. By uncovering the misalignments between recommended protocols and actual implementation, the study emphasizes the potential influence of patient hygiene-related guidelines in curbing the prevalence of CAUTIs. The findings underscore the significance of bridging the gap between theory and practice, reinforcing the importance of evidence-based interventions encompassing clinical procedures and the non-clinical nuances impacting patient outcomes.
Katayama et al. (2022)
This study is tailored to shed light on the appropriateness and prevalence of indwelling urinary catheters. The researchers employ a comprehensive multicenter point prevalence approach within Japanese hospital wards. It scrutinizes catheter utilization; the research seeks to uncover crucial insights into the factors associated with inappropriate catheter use. Through this exploration, the study provides a foundation for identifying targeted interventions and educational strategies that can effectively mitigate the occurrence of CAUTIs. The research is characterized by its emphasis on real-world practice, delving beyond theoretical considerations to reveal the practical challenges and opportunities in CAUTI prevention. The study's comprehensive nature aligns with this essay's overarching goal: establishing a robust CAUTI prevention framework that integrates various nursing practice dimensions.
Wooller et al. (2018)
The focus of this research was on addressing unnecessary urinary catheter utilization, and this is done by adopting a pre and post-intervention design to evaluate the impact of nurse-led initiatives on CAUTI rates. The research aligns seamlessly with the essay's objective of exploring nurse-led interventions for CAUTI prevention. By examining the effects of these interventions, the study recognizes the significant role nurses play in advocating patient safety and proper catheter management. The deliberate emphasis on nurse-led initiatives underscores their potential to drive evidence-based practices that reduce CAUTIs. The study's design allows for the assessment of real-world outcomes, bridging the gap between theoretical recommendations and practical implementation. As this study resonates closely with the essay's theme, it offers valuable insights that inform the proposed evidence-based practice change for CAUTI prevention.
Supporting the Nursing Practice Problem
The articles by Atkins et al. (2020) and Mota and Oliveira (2019) are particularly aligned with the nursing practice problem. Atkins et al. (2020) delve into the barriers and facilitators of CAUTI prevention, recognizing the complexity of altering healthcare behavior. This study acknowledges that successful interventions must consider individual motivations, institutional support, and effective communication. Similarly, Mota and Oliveira (2019) examine the gaps in clinical practice related to CAUTI prevention, addressing patient education, catheter care, and adherence to guidelines. The findings from these studies collectively underscore the need for interventions that encompass non-clinical aspects and patient education, aligning with the broader objective of enhancing CAUTI prevention.
The other two articles, Katayama et al. (2022) and Wooller et al. (2018), contribute by providing insights into interventions and their outcomes. Katayama et al. (2022) address the appropriateness and prevalence of indwelling urinary catheters, offering insights into the scope of the problem and guiding targeted interventions. On the other hand, Wooller et al. (2018) evaluate the impact of nurse-led initiatives on reducing unnecessary catheter utilization and CAUTI rates. This study aligns directly with the PICOT question, emphasizing the significance of nurse-led interventions in curbing CAUTI rates. These studies collectively emphasize the importance of evidence-based practices, nurse-led interventions, and targeted strategies to address the nursing practice problem effectively.
Method of Studies
Atkins et al. (2020) employ strategic behavioral analysis and systematic reviews to delve into barriers and facilitators of prevention, affording comprehensive insights into the intricate behavioral dynamics affecting healthcare practitioners' adherence to preventive measures. However, a notable drawback is the potential introduction of bias during the analysis process, as subjective content interpretation could introduce researcher subjectivity and potentially impact the objectivity of findings. In the study by Mota and Oliveira (2019), an observational approach is embraced, utilizing qualitative research met...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
Types of Interventions Improve Adherence to Recommendations on Nutritional Intake
2 pages/≈550 words | 3 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Other (Not Listed) |
-
Teaching Plan – Dementia
2 pages/≈550 words | 2 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Other (Not Listed) |
-
Agenda Comparison Grid and Analysis
4 pages/≈1100 words | 4 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Other (Not Listed) |