Student Teaching Evaluation of Performance (STEP)
Assessment Description
After you have implemented each lesson in the unit, as well as completed the post-assessment, collaborate with your cooperating teacher/mentor to analyze the results of the post-assessment and determine student learning. Review your data and whether there is a student or group of students who have not mastered the objectives, and discuss what you will do to further develop students’ knowledge and skills.
Complete the Post-Test and Post-Assessment tables in STEP Standard 6. Respond to the questions in Standard 6 based on the assessment results.
Reflective practice is crucial in education and becomes the foundation for ongoing growth and development as a professional. Once you have implemented the lessons within your unit, you should reflect on how the instructional practices influenced the learning outcomes. The assessment data provides tangible evidence that you can use to tie outcomes back to instruction. You should also determine what revisions you could make to the design of the unit in order to improve student learning.
After analyzing and reflecting on your experiences developing and delivering your instructional unit, complete STEP Standard 7. In the template, list three short-term goals to improve specific areas of your teaching practice based on the unit of instruction, as well as your plan to reach each short-term goal.
Include your "STEP Template" in your “Professional Teaching Portfolio” under the section "Instruction/Classroom Management."
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
Student Teaching Evaluation of Performance (STEP) Template
STEP Standard 6 - Analysis of Student Learning
After you have implemented each lesson in the unit, as well as completed the post-assessment, collaborate with your cooperating teacher/mentor to analyze the results of the post-assessment and determine student learning. Review your data and whether there is a student or group of students who have not mastered the objectives and discuss what you will do to further develop students’ knowledge and skills.
Post-Test Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ learning on the topic, collect and analyze the post-test data to determine the effectiveness of your instruction and assessment.
Number of Students
Pre-Test
Number of Students
Post-Test
Highly Proficient (90%-100%)
5
5
Proficient
(80%-89%)
8
8
Partially Proficient
(70%-79%)
0
0
Minimally Proficient
(69% and below)
0
0
Post-Test Analysis: Whole Class
Analysis of the data from the pre-test and post-test assessments indicate no changes in the students’ ability to meet the learning goal and measurable objectives after the adoption of instructional activities for improving learning outcomes. The classroom worksheets and summary assessment of the student’s assignments show that the students understand the learning materials used for enhancing their abilities to master the learning objectives. Though there were no significant changes in the students’ ability to meet the learning goals and measurable objectives, there were some shifts among students who were highly proficient and proficient pretest. One of the students from who was proficient pre-test exhibited enhanced abilities in meeting the learning goal and measurable objectives, making the shift to the highly proficient group post-test. Another student from the highly proficient group pre-test shifted to the proficient standard post-test due to less engagement and participation in the instructional activities for improved learning outcomes.
Analysis of data from the post-test assessment indicate no significant changes in the students’ abilities to meet learning objectives and outcomes after the implementation of instructional activities for improved learning outcomes. The post-test shifting of two students from the highly-proficient to the proficient level and vice versa reflects the individual differences in the efficacy of the instructional activities in promoting the students abilities to meet the learning outcomes and objectives. Consequently, there is need for implementing further instructional activities to effect significant changes of improvements in the students’ learning abilities.
Post-Assessment Analysis: Subgroup Selection Pre-Test - Administer, collect, and score the pre-test. Enter data in the Table for Whole Class Pre-Test Results by LGComplete. Replace information with your information. Delete or add columns as needed by highlighting area, right click, “Delete ” or “Insert.”
The instructional activities were administered to a subgroup of four of the students, three boys and two girls, categorized as gifted students. The students were selected based on the assessment of the participation in the classroom activities. The students displayed high levels of understanding and abilities to incorporate elements of the classroom activities in meeting the different learning objectives and outcomes in class. The past and current academic performances of the students also informed their selection for the instructional activity.
Post-Assessment Data: Subgroup (Gender, ELL population, Gifted, students on IEPs or 504s, etc.)
Number of Students
Pre-Test
Number of Students
Post-Test
Highly Proficient (90%-100%)
4
3
Proficient
(80%-89%)
0
1
Partially Proficient
(70%-79%)
0
0
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
Individualized Education Program (IEP) Performance Standards
3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | APA | Education | Other (Not Listed) |
-
Role of Educators in Addressing the High Level of Inequality Among Learners
2 pages/≈550 words | 5 Sources | APA | Education | Other (Not Listed) |
-
Importance of Teachers' Good Assessment and Instructional Choices
2 pages/≈550 words | 5 Sources | APA | Education | Other (Not Listed) |