Essay Available:
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
0
Style:
Other
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.2
Topic:
Question
Essay Instructions:
No APA please no APA
Answer these question separate
the first question is put 3 paragraphs
1. Werhane and Radin contend that EAW (employment at will) is a violation of the respect employees are due as persons. However, if employees voluntarily accept the terms of their employment, including being at will employees, is it proper to say that they are not provided the respect they are due when employers are merely following the rule of the contract that was agreed to?
the second question is
put 3 paragraph
2. In the article by Michael Davis, “Some Paradoxes of Whistle-Blowing, two distinct theories of morally justified whistle-blowing are discussed. Which theory do you find more convincing? Explain why.
Page 2 put the case answer on the second page
Let's get your thoughts on the Discussion Topic 1 Case.
This is the case Give your thoughts on the case
Chantale Leroux works as a clerk for Avco Environmental Services, a small toxic-waste disposal company.
The company has a contract to dispose of medical waste from a local hospital. During the course of her work, Chantale came across documents that suggest that Avco has actually been disposing of some of this medical waste in a local municipal landfill. Chantale is shocked. She knows this practice is illegal. And even though only a small portion of the medical waste that Avco handles is being disposed of this way, any amount at all seems a worrisome threat to public health.
Chantale gathers together the appropriate documents and takes them to her immediate superior, Dave Lamb. Dave says, "Look, I don't think that sort of thing is your concern, or mine. We're in charge of record-keeping, not making decisions about where this stuff gets dumped. I suggest you drop it."
The next day, Chantale decides to go one step further, and talk to Angela van Wilgenburg, the company's Operations Manager. Angela is clearly irritated. Angela says, "This isn't your concern. Look, these are the sorts of cost-cutting moves that let a little company like ours compete with our giant competitors. Besides, everyone knows that the regulations in this area are overly cautious. There's no real danger to anyone from the tiny amount of medical waste that 'slips' into the municipal dump. I consider this matter closed."
Chantale considers her situation. The message from her superiors was loud and clear. She strongly suspects that making further noises about this issue could jeopardize her job. Further, she generally has faith in the company's management. They've always seemed like honest, trustworthy people. But she was troubled by this apparent disregard for public safety. On the other hand, she asks herself whether maybe Angela was right in arguing that the danger was minimal. Chantale looks up the phone number of an old friend who worked for the local newspaper.
Essay Sample Content Preview:
Name:
Tutor’s Name:
Course/Grade:
Date:
Question 1
At- will employment is a doctrine that defines an employment whereby any party can break the relationship with no liability. When an employer keenly follows a contract agreed upon, it certainly implies that is what is agreed between the employer and the employee. Suggestions of disrespect against the employee are not considered because the employment at will agreement incorporates employees’ rights that are required to be pursued.
Before employees sign the contract, they should seek considerable measures of comprehending the agreement, if it best suits them or not, rather than rush to sign the agreement and realize that it’s limiting. Employees should understand the condition and environment that they work in, and any other pertinent information before agreeing to the contract.
Upon conclusion of the agreement, the employer might be unfair or disrespectful to the employee when detailed matters addressed in the agreement are not honored like denial of base salary, refusal of expense reimbursement and other benefits.
Question 2
Complicity theory is most convincing of the two theories the reasons why is that moral complicity itself supposes moral wrongdoing, not harm. So it automatically avoids the paradox of missing harm, placing the facts of whistle blowing better than the standard theory which emphasizes prevention of harm.
Complicity theory invokes a more involving obligation than the ability to prevent harm does. Generally we are morally obliged to avoid doing moral wrongs. Despite of our best efforts, we nonetheless find ourselves engaged in wrong doings, we have an obligation to do what we reasonably can to f...
Tutor’s Name:
Course/Grade:
Date:
Question 1
At- will employment is a doctrine that defines an employment whereby any party can break the relationship with no liability. When an employer keenly follows a contract agreed upon, it certainly implies that is what is agreed between the employer and the employee. Suggestions of disrespect against the employee are not considered because the employment at will agreement incorporates employees’ rights that are required to be pursued.
Before employees sign the contract, they should seek considerable measures of comprehending the agreement, if it best suits them or not, rather than rush to sign the agreement and realize that it’s limiting. Employees should understand the condition and environment that they work in, and any other pertinent information before agreeing to the contract.
Upon conclusion of the agreement, the employer might be unfair or disrespectful to the employee when detailed matters addressed in the agreement are not honored like denial of base salary, refusal of expense reimbursement and other benefits.
Question 2
Complicity theory is most convincing of the two theories the reasons why is that moral complicity itself supposes moral wrongdoing, not harm. So it automatically avoids the paradox of missing harm, placing the facts of whistle blowing better than the standard theory which emphasizes prevention of harm.
Complicity theory invokes a more involving obligation than the ability to prevent harm does. Generally we are morally obliged to avoid doing moral wrongs. Despite of our best efforts, we nonetheless find ourselves engaged in wrong doings, we have an obligation to do what we reasonably can to f...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now: