Analyzing Holt and McCrone through Scott's Theory
The purpose of a response paper is to respond to the readings, not summarize them. This is an important distinction. Your success in this course depends in large part in your understanding this distinction.
For all of the response papers, you need to have a strong argument, also known as a thesis. This means that in the first few sentences you need to explicitly state what your are going to argue. The rest of the response paper should be used proving your argument with evidence from the readings.
For these assignments, you may use parenthetical citations. For example, "Intercollegiate football was maintained and reformed in the early 1900s because many university professors and administrators... saw it as a cultural ritual that, besides training young men ... would publicize universities." (Ingrassia, 3)
The Scott article is an example of a theoretical discussion of how we write history. In other words, she is arguing that as historians work they should construct their argument in certain ways.
The Holt & McCrone readings are more standard piece of history which do not overtly address the theoretical underpinnings of their writing. Even though their theoretical bases are not discussed explicitly, by definition, the authors have theories of history. They have a sense of what is important, of what is not important, of what should be included and what should be excluded.
Perhaps the most important thing you can take away from this course is the understanding that history books are not revealed truth, but arguments about the past. These arguments are not infallibly true, but are subject to constant criticism and re-evaluation by readers, including but not limited to other historians. This is not to say that there is no truth, just that even with the agreed upon facts, how historians come to understand the past is a human endeavor and therefore flawed. Our job as readers is to understand that and approach every piece of writing critically.
So, your assignment is to write a short essays which uses the theory discussed in Scott to evaluate Holt & McCrone. This should be 500-600 words long. Please include a word count at the end of your piece.
Analyzing Holt and McCrone through Scott’s Theory
Institutional Affiliation
Student’s Name
Course Name/Number
Instructor’s name
Date Submitted
Throughout the ages, individuals have made figurative allusions by utilizing grammatical terms to bring out attributes of sexuality or character. Most recently, feminists have in a more extreme and literal manner started to use ‘gender’ as a technique of alluding to the social structure including the connection between the genders. Here, Scott addresses the historicity of words, that they are utilized to play upon general stereotypes or transform mentalities and that they for sure change. Above all, Scott features the grammatical term ‘gender’ to fix distinctive characteristics and define traits to the sexes (Scott, 1986). Previously, (as is currently) this was used humorously. Scott contends that feminists have started to utilize the word to illustrate social organization. One major key point derived from Scott’s theory is, we cannot assert that women’s roles or men’s roles have customarily been what they are due to some inherent biological function. In fact, even the sex roles themselves are culturally built to a certain extent (Scott, 1986).
When employing Scott’s theory to assess both Holt and McCrone, it is evident that in both cases, the comprehension of women’s position in the cultural heritage of modern society is undermined. Holt and McCrone bring together the hitherto discrete viewpoints of women’s studies and the social history of sports. The British view, aptly established by Kathleen McCrone well displays and records how her school’s headmistress encouraged games for the furtherance of moral and physical benefits; nonetheless, the headmistress’s aims were unmistakably at variance with those at boys’ schools (McCrone, 1984).
As observed in McCrone’ and Holt’s reading, rough sports example cricket and hockey were regularly faulted by contemporaries as being physiolog...