Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
0
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:
Purpose of Philosophy for Berlin and Socrates' Response in The Apology
Essay Instructions:
Please answer the following 5 questions. You should address each question by writing between half a page and one page. Each question is worth 20 points.
The exam should be typed in a document using in MLA format, with Times New Roman or Calibri fonts, size 12, and have 1-inch margins on all sizes. Point will be deducted if the exam is not submitted using this format.
- According to Isaiah Berlin, what sets apart the questions that philosophy addresses from the questions that are addressed by the empirical sciences and the questions that are addressed by mathematics and logic? What is the purpose of philosophy for Berlin and why is it important?
- What is the question that Socrates raises to Euthyphro after Euthyphro maintains that the pious (or piety) is what all the god love? Why is neither of one the two alternatives that are presented in the question acceptable?
- Please rehearse in detail how Socrates responds in The Apology to the accusation that he corrupts the young, focusing on the two arguments that he presents during the cross-examination of Meletus.
- Please rehearse in detail how Socrates responds in The Apology to the accusation that he does not believe in the Gods, focusing on the reasoning that he deploys during the cross-examination of Meletus.
- Please rehearse in detail one (and only one) of the objections that either Cebes or Simmias presents to Socrates to challenge the claim that the soul is immortal, and then present the response that Socrates offers to that objection.
Essay Sample Content Preview:
Name
Institution
Course Code and Title
Instructor
Date
Question 1
According to Isaiah Berlin, there is a difference in how philosophy and empirical sciences, mathematics, and logic address questions. Berlin philosophy, addressing questions in both factual and formal aspects, has a specialized method that, once followed directs one to the correct answer. Contrary philosophical questions are answered differently from mathematical, logical, and empirical science questions since they do not follow a specific method or technique nor can one take an experiment or reduce from an empirical observation. Philosophical questions, therefore, do not have a definitive answer. Philosophy has the purpose of exploring and providing solutions to complex fundamental questions that lack definitive answers from empirical science, logic, or mathematics. Philosophy study involves the use of common sense, beliefs, and the natural sciences methods. It provides a view of how matters of a considerable degree without experience are conceived or classified. Philosophy is, therefore, crucial as it helps individuals to engage intellectually with questions by considering the beliefs, values, and different ideas that have been historically put through.
Question 2
Socrates poses the question: “Do the gods love the pious because it is pious, or is it pious because the gods love it?” This is after Euthyphro asserts that the gods love piousness (or piety), a dilemma on morality that questions the relationship between the gods and moral values. The pious have some characteristics that are recognized and liked by the gods, and Euthyphro states, “What is dear to the gods is pious, what is not is impious.” Hence, the alternative is that the gods love the pious. The second alternative states that the pious is pious because the gods love it, giving the implication that if the gods stop liking something, then it ceases to be pious. Thus, morality changes with how the gods like or dislike something. According to Socrates, the alternatives contradict that what might seem moral might not be favored by certain gods. Thus, a philosophical question on what is naturally pious and how morality relates to pious.
Question 3
Socrates responds to the accusations of corrupting the young through an apology. Socrates approa...
Institution
Course Code and Title
Instructor
Date
Question 1
According to Isaiah Berlin, there is a difference in how philosophy and empirical sciences, mathematics, and logic address questions. Berlin philosophy, addressing questions in both factual and formal aspects, has a specialized method that, once followed directs one to the correct answer. Contrary philosophical questions are answered differently from mathematical, logical, and empirical science questions since they do not follow a specific method or technique nor can one take an experiment or reduce from an empirical observation. Philosophical questions, therefore, do not have a definitive answer. Philosophy has the purpose of exploring and providing solutions to complex fundamental questions that lack definitive answers from empirical science, logic, or mathematics. Philosophy study involves the use of common sense, beliefs, and the natural sciences methods. It provides a view of how matters of a considerable degree without experience are conceived or classified. Philosophy is, therefore, crucial as it helps individuals to engage intellectually with questions by considering the beliefs, values, and different ideas that have been historically put through.
Question 2
Socrates poses the question: “Do the gods love the pious because it is pious, or is it pious because the gods love it?” This is after Euthyphro asserts that the gods love piousness (or piety), a dilemma on morality that questions the relationship between the gods and moral values. The pious have some characteristics that are recognized and liked by the gods, and Euthyphro states, “What is dear to the gods is pious, what is not is impious.” Hence, the alternative is that the gods love the pious. The second alternative states that the pious is pious because the gods love it, giving the implication that if the gods stop liking something, then it ceases to be pious. Thus, morality changes with how the gods like or dislike something. According to Socrates, the alternatives contradict that what might seem moral might not be favored by certain gods. Thus, a philosophical question on what is naturally pious and how morality relates to pious.
Question 3
Socrates responds to the accusations of corrupting the young through an apology. Socrates approa...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now: