Legal Realism

Name
Professor
Course
Institution
Date
LEGAL REALISM
Legal realism is one of the schools of legal philosophy. Legal realism, as a school of thought, challenges the orthodox claims of the classical legal thought. Under the classical thought, the law is seen as an autonomous system of principles and rules that can be applied by courts to reach proper decisions with judicial legal background CITATION Fis93 \p p.32 \l 2057 (Schlegel p.32).The realists strongly maintain that adjudication of common law is a subjective system that is bound to produce inconsistent results. Common law eliminates objectivity; the judges` makes decisions based on their moral, social and political affiliations. It is the duty of every citizen to abide by the law and take it upon him/herself to report those who break the law. In his sociological theory of relativity, Donald Black claims that social variables not only make significant influence in the legal decision making process but that legal decisions and outcomes are significantly determined by social factors. The idea of equality before the law requires that, all legal cases with similar facts be decided in a similar, no discriminate manner CITATION Fis93 \p p.34 \l 2057 (Schlegel p.34). This legal standard is not always realized and the legal decision making process is affected by the incorporation of social variables. Discrimination is a crucial issue worth analysis when one talks about analysis of human rights. The law should apply equally irrespective of one`s political or social standing. This is better said than done as judicial decisions have been found to be discriminating in many cases. Discrimination is a problem that always arises in relation to equality before the law. There is a lot of discussion on discrimination yet much of this is irrational analysis and poor understanding of the aforesaid concept CITATION Bon01 \p p.10 \l 2057 (Berry p.10). It is with no doubt that human beings are not equal in all aspects. Every individual is different from the other in a unique way, be it mental or physical attributes. These differences sometimes lead to acts that manifest as forms of discrimination CITATION Bon01 \p p.5 \l 2057 (Berry p.5). There are truly many situations where one individual should be treated in a different manner from the other as a child is subjected to different duties from those of the adult. According to the demands of the Rule of Law, individuals should be protected from any arbitrary power as well as enjoy equal privilege and protection of the law CITATION Fra07 \p p.1 \l 2057 (Trindade p.1). This is a principle that judicial systems have always tried to achieve and maintain. However, social variables that are always underestimated and considered as less relevant in case facts are influencing the legal decision making process. This influence is creating a judicial system that favors some individuals or parties in expense or over others. The result is a contradiction between the philosophical intentions of the law and the way the law is actually practiced. Legal philosophy has accepted ideals of equality which are absent from actual practice of law. The phrase access to justice is a broad concept just like the way justice is a vague concept. There are so many factors that have to be put in consideration in an attempt of trying to understand what access to justice actually means CITATION Fra07 \p p.2 \l 2057 (Trindade p.2). Such factors include a definition of the class or part of society that requires access to justice. Although the right of access to justice is considered a fundamental right, there are no universally and fundamentally applicable means of satisfying this right as the society is composed of heterogeneous groups. This heterogeneity makes it hard to come up with a single definition of access to justice. Justice may be said to be the application of the law in governing, and the use of resources and infrastructures to administer justice. Access to justice constitutes fair access to all the privileges provided for under the bill of rights as well as access to the infrastructures of justice CITATION Fis93 \p p.35 \l 2057 (Schlegel p.35). Is this often the case? In practice, this is not what prevails. There are many factors contributing to these inequalities much of which are attributable to the means of access. The existing differences and imbalance between the poor and the rich creates the problem of fair access to justice. Some have more resources to allow them more access to justice than others CITATION Bon01 \p p.5 \l 2057 (Berry p.5). Access to justice, from a sociological point of view is seen and viewed in terms of access to legal needs; legal needs for the poor. These needs emerge when certain marginalized groups of people fail to benefit from the prevailing and existing legal solutions.
Law, in its nature, is complex and this in itself acts as a barrier, preventing the poor from accessing justice. In one way or the other, so many corrupt people go unpunished; this creates a situation of mistrust of the law. Reluctance among the poor people is a common feature. They are always reluctant especially when it comes to issues involving the courts; there is a lot of stigma associated with any encounter with the law. This magnificent reluctance acts as a hindrance towards access to justice. Education is a right as well as a need yet there is a vast majority of people who are uneducated if not illiterate in Canada. Legal matters and the formalities which have to be adhered to when seeking legal justice require expert knowledge. Poor people are always with no education and it becomes exceptionally difficult to access justice without education. Lack of awareness of one`s rights, freedoms and the right actions to take towards seeking justice is the greatest barrier the poor people face when we talk of access to justice.There is often need for legal representations as most legal systems do not even allow private citizens to make self represe...