100% (1)
Pages:
6 pages/≈1650 words
Sources:
-1
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:

Truth and Philosophers' Views

Essay Instructions:

Requirement:

1. Write a paper based on the reading materials attached. In the essay, propose a philosophical question and explore the question throughout the essay.

2. Refer to specific quotes or examples from the reading materials.

3. You can compare, contrast, agree, disagree with the philosophers from the reading materials.

4. The ideas for the essay should be thoughtful and deep. Refer to specific philosophers(from the reading) and try to mention more philosopher from the readings.

5. Stick with the reading materials. You don't have to use all of them, but refer to as many as possible.

5. ps: I attached my own reading notes and some analysis for each week's reading. You can use them directly if you find some of them useful.

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Student's Name
Instructor
Course
Date
Philosophy Paper
Which do philosophers and scholars define as the source of truth among human beings?
In most cases, the concept of truth is often confusing and tends to be interpreted in different ways. Most people have varying opinions on what should be regarded as being true. For example, some people consider the things that comfort them and declare it as the truth. In contrast, others believe that the truth is a particular, universal concept accepted by all people. In this sense, the definition of truth is usually complex. Another intriguing aspect is that people tend to disagree on the actual path that should be used to derive the truth. Some people believe that the truth needs to be proven by the use of physical and comprehensive data. In this sense, scientific concepts need to be integrated to ensure that facts that often lead to the truth are identified. On the other hand, people believe that the truth is mainly derived through several personal experiences in one's day-to-day activities. This source of the truth is often identified as art and usually entails obtaining information from a small scale and may sometimes not always lead to accuracy and indisputable truth (Adorno and Horkheimer n.p). In most cases, this is a truth that often leads to providing persons with a certain sense of comfort. Nevertheless, most people argue against this type of truth as it is not always consistent and cannot be proven through data. Every situation will trigger different and distinctive emotions in a variety of people; thereby, each of them will tend to have different perceptions of the truth. In this regard, this is a truth that is usually based on a person's experiences as well as their current and past moods/emotions.
Another aspect of defining truth is through philosophical means. In essence, philosophy is usually designed to help people analyze and understand things and aspects from different points of view. As such, there is a general agreement that seeking the truth through philosophy is often unrealistic. In most cases, philosophy seeks to illustrate that what people initially believed more often ends up not being the truth. In relation to the truth, philosophy helps human beings identify themselves and the aspects they choose to believe and is essential in deciding to react or make decisions based on different sets of circumstances (Heidegger n.p). In essence, philosophy helps people be rational beings who will come up with conclusions without any significant bias, thereby making the most impartial decisions. Based on philosophical concepts, the truth comes from impartial decisions that will lead to the most positive and desired outcomes.
Another approach to derive the truth is through mathematics and science. Although the approaches are often credited for providing data that lead to the identification of the truth, the two methods cannot be used in all situations. In most cases, the two approaches involve too many variables, making it challenging to find out the truth. Notably, the processes of finding the truth have integrated a lot of personalities, thought processes, likes, and dislikes, making human beings cannot be subjected to a single set of absolute truths. In this regard, the path to the truth is complex and entails varying factors and concepts. More so, philosophers tend guided by the notion that human beings have not fully developed mentally to the point of seeking the truth without involving their emotions and beliefs. Most people tend to find it difficult to acquire accurate knowledge and seek the truth through the use of physical evidence and indisputable data. As a result, human beings' emotional aspect means that truth will continue to elude them despite perceptions and believes that it exists.
Most philosophers have different views and opinions when it comes to the truth concept. To begin with, Hegel is one of the philosophers who have given their views on the truth concept. His view is that truth is usually made up of three main essential aspects. One of the aspects is that truth should be identified as an isolated and static concept, rather than organic unity that is the development of several concepts and things (Houlgate n.p). Hegel's aspect is that truth is usually obsolete and cannot be termed as immediate knowledge (Houlgate n.p). He also states that truth is an aspect that is usually complemented by errors. According to Hegel, a person's truth on a certain subject is determined by how well they understand. In this regard, the truth is based on a person's senses, perceptions, and understanding of a particular subject (Hou...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!