Shroud children who commit adult crimes should be tried as adults or as children
you are ganna talk about the first topic and chose to support one side of the argument. and i am ganna upload the prompt please read it very carefully.
1. "Little Adult Criminals" (593), "Should Juvenile Offenders Be Tried as Adults?" (596), "Adult Crime, Adult Time" (601), "Young Voices from the Cell" (606), True Notebooks, and Juvies present different views on this question: should children who commit adult crimes be tried as adults or children? Write an essay in which you argue whether or not children who commit "adult" crimes should be tried as adults or as children.
2. "Little Adult Criminals" (593), "Should Juvenile Offenders Be Tried as Adults?" (596), "Adult Crime, Adult Time" (601), "Young Voices from the Cell" (606), True Notebooks, and Juvies also make commentary on the punishment and sentencing of young offenders. Write an essay in which you argue a logical plan for sentencing and punishing these children.
3. "Little Adult Criminals" (593), "Should Juvenile Offenders Be Tried as Adults?" (596), "Adult Crime, Adult Time" (601), "Young Voices from the Cell" (606), True Notebooks, and Juvies also present another question: is justice being served by trying these young offenders as adults? Write an essay in which you argue whether or not justice is or is not being served by trying youth as adults.
ssay #3: Argumentative Writing
For your third take-home essay in this class, you will write an essay in which choose one of the prompts below and make an argument. As you write the essay, please make sure that you are attentive to each step of the writing process (brainstorming, planning, researching, drafting, revising, and editing). This is the last take-home option for the portfolio, so make sure to put your best effort forward.
Writing an organized and logical argument is key to college writing; hence, it is the last paper you will write in this class before you move on to Wf5S5T~It will draw upon what we have worked on throughout this semester: analysis, cause/effect', description, and narration.
Alright, take a breath now. Though an "argumentative" essay may sound daunting, argumentation is something that we do in conversation often. Think about your last debate or argument. What were some of the key elements? Usually, each of you had a point with reasons as to why you were right; you had some proof to back it up; if your opponent argued a point better than you, you conceded; at the end, you kept things amiable. This is the general format for a written persuasive essay as well. See, you can do it!
Please see the reverse side of this handout for your topic choices. I have set them up so you can organize and develop them carefully. Additionally, you will find that you are already knowledgeable on the topics since they all deal with the texts we have been and will read and watch: True Notebooks, Juvies, "Little Adult Criminals" (593), "Should Juvenile Offenders Be Tried as Adults?" (596), "Adult Crime, Adult Time" (601), and "Young Voices from the Cell" (606). .
Directions and Requirements
As discussed in class, all well-written argumentative essays contain the following (which you will be graded on). It is your choice as to how you organize these sections, but they must be in the essay.
• A clear position statement on the topic (thesis)
• Background information on the topic (usually one paragraph after the introduction)
• Supporting points (several paragraphs—this is the crux of your essay)
Opposing arguments, rebuttal^, and concessions (woven throughout the essay)
Your essay will also be graded on the following criteria:
• The introduction must have a hook Jsumman>of the topic (bridge), and thesis.,*
• A background information paragraph after the introduction (if necessary).
• The body paragraphs must have a topic sentence, evidence/examples, and analysis/explanation of how the evidence used supports the thesis. Think of MEAL.
• The conclusion will leave us thinking about the topic.
• A minimum of three (3.5) pages
• Use of at least two sources; your choices are "Little Adult Criminals" (593), "Should Juvenile Offenders Be Tried as Adults?" (596), "Adult Crime, Adult Time" (601), and "Young Voices from the Cell" (606), True Notebooks, and Juvies. You do not need to conduct any additional research outside of these sources.
Professor:
Title:
Date:
Shroud children who commit adult crimes should be tried as adults or as children
When a child commits murder, does the child instantaneously become a grown-up, or does she keep some trappings of childhood, regardless of the seriousness of her particular actions? At present, these questions plague the legal system in the United States, as the violent actions of adolescent criminals continue making headlines (Reaves 12). Under state law, youngsters of age 16 or below who break the law are taken before a juvenile court judge, whilst individuals who are 17 years old or older are considered as adults, and they are subject to the adult justice system. Some people believe that juveniles who commit adult crimes have to be treated as adults in court. Conversely, others maintain that they should not be treated as adults. In this paper, the thesis statement is: Children who commit adult crimes should be tried as children, not as adults. Furthermore, adolescents who commit adult offenses, even those who commit crimes that seem unforgivable such as murder, could be rehabilitated and become good, responsible adults.
Children who commit adult crimes should not be tried as adults in court. They are still youngsters and have not seen the dangers of the world. Although juveniles are old enough to know the dissimilarity between a wrong act and a right one, they are still very young to make the right choices. Studies have demonstrated that basing upon the brain development of children; they are less likely to think before acting, or to pause to think about the possible outcomes of their actions. They are more likely to misread social cues and emotions, act on impulse, and/or engage in behaviors which are risky (Schwartz 4). These brain dissimilarities do not imply that adolescents cannot differentiate between wrong and right. It also does not connote that children should not be held accountable for their respective actions. It simply means that children are unable to make wise decisions like adults.
Scientists have discovered a certain section of the brain known as amygdale that is responsible for instinctual reactions such as aggressive behavior, as well as fear. It is notable that this particular section develops early. Nonetheless, the frontal cortex, the brain region which controls reasoning and assists an individual to think before he/she acts develops later. For children, this part is not yet completely grown; it is still changing and maturing properly into a good adulthood (Reaves 14). Latest brain imaging technology underpins the adolescent developme...