The uploaded books must be used and the titles are determined based on the content of the books.

SOUTH KOREA'S ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION by [Name] Course Professor Institution Date Introduction South Korea's transformation from a war-torn nation in the 1950s to a global economic powerhouse by the 1990s is a compelling example of developmental economics. Between 1960 and 1997, GDP per capita rose from $80 to over $20,000, while poverty rates dropped from 40% to below 10%. These outcomes reflect rapid economic growth, profound structural transformation, and poverty reduction driven by state-led industrial policies, export-driven strategies, and investments in infrastructure and education. However, the 1997 Asian financial crisis introduced challenges, prompting economic liberalization and social welfare expansion (Jee, 1997). The developmental state theory, focusing on state-led industrial policies, strategic investments, and coordinated economic planning, provides the most comprehensive explanation for South Korea's economic transformation, effectively addressing inequality and fostering growth, unlike neoliberalism and dependency theory. South Korea's Economic Transformation: Evidence and Context South Korea's transformation from a war-torn nation to an economic powerhouse is one of the most remarkable success stories of the 20th century. Following the devastation of the Korean War, the country faced widespread poverty and relied heavily on foreign aid. This economic stagnation was further rooted in the legacy of Japanese colonial rule (1910–1945), which left behind a dual legacy of limited industrial infrastructure and significant exploitation of Korean resources. While colonial industrialization focused primarily on Japanese interests, it did create the foundation for South Korea's later state-led industrial policies. Post-independence, South Korea inherited a deeply inequitable land tenure system, which the government addressed through sweeping land reforms in the 1950s (Jee, 1997). These reforms redistributed land to tenant farmers, reducing rural inequality and providing a more equitable foundation for economic growth (Moore, 1984). This enabled the eventual migration of surplus labor from agriculture to industrial sectors during rapid industrialization. In the 1960s, under President Park Chung Hee, South Korea implemented economic reforms centered on export-oriented industrialization (EOI). These reforms prioritized heavy industries and manufacturing as growth drivers, enabling South Korea to achieve an average annual GDP growth rate of 9% between the 1960s and the 1990s. During this period, per capita income soared from $80 in 1960 to $20,000 by 1997, positioning South Korea as a model for economic development in emerging economies (Lee and Lee, 2015). A key aspect of South Korea's success was its structural transformation from an agrarian economy to an industrial and service-based one. In 1960 agriculture employed nearly 50% of the workforce, but by 1990, this figure had fallen to just 6%. The state was pivotal in this shift, prioritizing steel, shipbuilding, and semiconductor industries. Targeted subsidies, credit allocation, and state-led policies propelled manufacturing's share of GDP from 14% in 1960 to 40% in 1990 (Holliday, 2000). These policies facilitated industrialization and established South Korea as a competitive exporter in global markets, laying the groundwork for its technological advancements. Significant reductions in poverty and inequality accompanied economic growth in South Korea. Investments in universal education created a skilled workforce that fueled industrialization and fostered upward mobility. As a result, poverty incidence dropped dramatically from 40% in 1960 to less than 10% by the 1990s (Kwon, 2005). Education policies also supported the rise of the middle class, which became a stabilizing force for the nation's political and economic systems. Surprisingly, during the 1997 Asian financial crisis, South Korea adopted neoliberal reforms under the guidance of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), yet it ran into trouble. This financial liberalization, labor market deregulation, and less intervention by the state reforms temporarily raised income inequality and unemployment (Kwon, 2005). While these setbacks occurred, the government pushed ahead with key social welfare programs such as the Minimum Living Standards guarantee to cushion those vulnerable and stabilize the economy. This success shows South Korea's economic transformation could have been achieved by combining strong state intervention and industrial policy with social investments. Like its neighbor, South Korea's developmental success story was driven by its focus on strategic sectors, its reduction of inequality, and its creation of social mobility. It is a model from which other nations striving for sustainable growth and economic resilience, can benchmark. Theoretical Framework: Developmental State Theory South Korea's economic transformation and the developmental state theory best explain its economic transformation because of the emphasis on a strong, interventionist state guiding industrialization and economic development. The state drives this theory from making strategic decisions to monitoring and central planning economic growth (Nem-Singh and Ovadia, 2018). Park Chung Hee is the head of state who details this approach more than any other, second only to South Korea within the confines of Asian leadership. His administration used an economic model relying on export-oriented industrialization (EOI), especially in defining the key sectors of steel, shipbuilding, electronics, and automotive manufacturing. All this contributed to the growth and competitiveness of the industry as the state sided with chaebols (such as Samsung and Hyundai) (Lee and Lee, 2015). The state closely supervised financial markets, which controlled credit to direct resources and credit to industries that represented national development (Holliday, 2000). State capacity, on which the developmental state theory depends, is a government's ability to execute policies and convert resources. South Korean states could assemble extremely forceful bureaucratic organizations and authority to coordinate the industrial strategy. For example, the government set up an Economic Planning Board to make policies on the development of a country and where to allocate the resources. Enforcing industrial policies promoting export-driven growth, such as subsidies, tax breaks, and trade protection, which make it possible for domestic industries to grow in a globally competitive environment, also reveals a level of state capacity. The state's control over capital allocation and its ability to discipline business elites enabled the chaebols to grow into drivers of industrialization while remaining aligned with national development goals. Class relations are also critical to understanding South Korea's success. Land reforms in the 1950s, implemented before rapid industrialization, redistributed land to tenant farmers, addressing rural inequalit...