Employees’ Learning and Development Interventions and Strategies to Eradicate Employee Disengagement
2 short essays
1500+ words each
Essay is about making an argument
Your task is to write two short essays (1500 words each) addressing any TWO (2) questions listed below. In your essay, you need to present an argument using the appropriate subject literatures and explain its relevance to the issues discussed. In your answer, use references to academic sources (articles and books) as well as professional sources (reports, statistics).
Choose TWO (2) of the following:
Q1. ‘Given the growth in the need of ‘soft’ or ‘employability’ skills for the future of work, the recruitment and selection process is going to be even more complex to conduct.’ Discuss this statement.
Q2. To what extent will the approach to talent management adopted by an organisation influence your decision about whether to apply for a job in future?
Q3. As a freshly minted graduate employee, what is it that you will be looking for from your employer’s performance management system? Is there anything about the traditional approach that appeals to you?
Q4. What strategies and approaches would you advocate organisations to develop in an effort to eradicate disengagement? Are some employees inherently disengaged?
Q5. In what ways might learning and development interventions support the business strategy?
Q6. If you are employed by an organisation which claims to follow a strategic approach to reward, what evidence can you amass to demonstrate that the approach is truly strategic? Suggest why strategic approaches to reward appear to be challenging for organisations.
Please ensure you pay sufficient attention to the introduction and conclusion (they should each be approximately 10% of the word count for the assignment).
EMPLOYEES’ LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTIONS AND STRATEGIES TO ERADICATE EMPLOYEE DISENGAGEMENT
Student name
Institution
Professor
Course
Date
Employees’ Learning and Development Interventions and Strategies to Eradicate Employee Disengagement
Essay 1(Qn. 4): Strategies to Eradicate Employee Disengagement
Introduction
The importance of employee involvement has grown significantly in recent years as businesses have come to understand its advantages. Engaged employees are more likely to be efficient, creative, and devoted to their companies. Contrarily, disengaged workers can seriously harm businesses through decreased output, high absenteeism, and increased attrition. Therefore, companies must devise plans to end disengagement and foster an engaged culture. This article will examine the various tactics and methods businesses can use to combat apathy. The article will look at how communication, employee growth, and company culture all foster employee involvement. The article will also address whether some workers are disengaged by nature or whether corporate variables play a role in employee disengagement. This article aims to offer companies helpful advice on how to develop a more involved workforce. Organizations can create a productive work atmosphere that encourages employee involvement and improves organizational performance by implementing the strategies and techniques outlined.
Theoretical Perspective
Self-determination theory. An academic viewpoint known as self-determination theory (SDT) emphasizes the value of liberty and innate drive-in fostering employee involvement. Autonomy, competence, and relatedness are the three psychological requirements that people have that are fundamental to their well-being and natural drive, according to SDT (Nazir et al., 2021). Competence means feeling effective at work, while liberty means being in charge of one's life and career. Relatedness is the need to feel valued by others. When these three psychological requirements are fulfilled at work, employees are more likely to experience innate motivation—the wish to participate in an activity for its own sake rather than for extrinsic incentives or pressures. According to numerous studies, employees who are naturally driven are more likely to be involved, pleased with their job, and dedicated to their company.
Employees who lack liberty, such as through micromanagement, or who believe that their job is under supervision or observation are more likely to become disengaged. Employees may view their job as having less significance when they do not feel in charge of it, which can result in feelings of apathy and lower drive. Research has also shown that various professions and sectors can have varying levels of employee liberty (Nazir et al., 2021). For instance, employees in more straightforward companies might have more autonomy than those in more structured ones. At the same time, those working in artistic or knowledge-intensive fields might need more latitude to do their jobs well.
The job demands-resources (JD-R) model. The job demands-resources (JD-R) paradigm is a theoretical viewpoint describing how employees' job demands and resources influence their involvement or disengagement. According to this model, work demands are the physical, psychological, social, or organizing elements of the work that necessitate continuous effort and are linked with bodily and psychological expenses (Borst et al., 2017). Workload, time constraints, mental demands, and competing demands are all examples of job demands. On the other hand, job resources are the physical, psychological, social, and organizational elements of the job that aid in achieving work objectives, reducing job duties, or stimulating personal growth, learning, and development. Job tools include social support, input, autonomy, growth chances, and rewards.
According to the JD-R model, employee involvement is decided by balancing work duties and job resources. Employees are more apt to withdraw when faced with excessive job demands and inadequate resources. Even with high workloads and time limitations, employees with high social support, liberty, and growth opportunities may be highly involved (Borst et al., 2017). Employees with poor work resources may also experience disengagement, even if their job demands are minimal.
Empirical Evidence
According to empirical data, employee involvement is constantly linked favorably to various outcomes, including work satisfaction, organizational commitment, and job success. Social support and liberty emerged as especially significant job resources for engagement, according to a meta-analysis of studies examining the link between job resources and employee engagement (Harrison, 2020). Similar to how job crafting and autonomous support can foster intrinsic motivation and engagement, research has shown that intrinsic motivation is a strong indicator of employee engagement.
Strategies to Eradicate Disengagement
Creation of an engagement culture. An active workplace encourages participation, input, and loyalty. Setting goals, allowing employee feedback, honoring successes, and encouraging open dialogue can create an engaged workplace. Studies show that valued employees are more engaged at their workplace. Define the purpose and ideals to foster commitment. Kappel (2018) suggests that employees must know the company's mission and ideals. Employees can help create the company's mission and values and ensure they meet its goals. Engaged workers feel heard and involved in decisions that impact them. Companies can do this with idea boxes, polls, and input requests (Kappel, 2018). Employee recognition boosts office activity. Recognizing an employee's job motivates them. Team chats, incentives, and raises show employee appreciation. Open debate is engaging. Organizations need open dialogue, two-way input, and staff awareness of critical choices.
Provision of opportunities for employee development. Organizations can use various strategies and techniques to successfully eliminate disengagement by offering chances for employee development. The study of Lai et al. (2020) determines the areas where workers need training and growth, and one tactic is to assess the training requirements of the workforce regularly. The workforce's requirements can be considered when prioritizing training and development programs for a company. Establishing mentorship and coaching programs is another strategy to help workers grow their job (Lai et al., 2020). This establishment can promote a sense of community and connection among employees while also assisting workers in developing their knowledge, confidence, and skills.
Through efforts like leadership development programs, organizations can give employees the training and resources they need to advance in their careers. Lai et al. (2020) postulated that offering a defined career route and chances for development and advancement within the company can aid in raising employee engagement. Employers can aid in the growth of their staff by implementing work enrichment and rotational programming (Lai et al., 2020). Organizations can keep workers engaged and motivated by allowing them to take on new duties and acquire new skills.
Improvement of communication. Having a motivated staff depends on effective communication. Harrison (2020) writes that regular feedback, open channels of communication, and the development of a transparent culture are ways organizations can enhance collaboration. Employees are more likely to be engaged in their job when they know their position within the company and receive frequent input.
Organizations can use various strategies and techniques to eliminate apathy through better communication successfully. According to Harrison (2020), one tactic is to make a communication plan that explains the aims, targets, and anticipations for the organization's communication efforts. The strategy can include both ways to get feedback from workers, like employee questionnaires and idea boxes, and ways to give them feedback regularly, like performance evaluations and one-on-one talks (Harrison, 2020). Establishing a communication training program for managers and leaders to enhance their speaking abilities is an alternative strategy. This action can involve instruction in dispute settlement, active hearing, and effective asking. Managers and supervisors can interact with workers more effectively and handle any issues or concerns that might be causing disengagement by developing their communication skills.
Are Some Employees Inherently Disengaged?
There is rising evidence that some workers are intrinsically disengaged. Neuroticism and introversion have been linked to lower interest (Hejjas et al., 2018). Disengaged workers may also have encountered job bullying or discrimination. However, organizational issues can also affect staff motivation. Disengagement can result from bad management, low morale, and no credit. Disengagement can also result from a mismatch between an employee's skills, interests, and ideals and the job or company ethos. Disengaged workers may feel their job could be more meaningful and aligned with their aims. Engaging disengaged workers requires various approaches and a mindset of engagement from the start (Hejjas et al., 2018). Organizations can boost employee interest and motivation by offering training, enhancing communication, and recognizing successes. Businesses must continuously work to eliminate disengagement to maintain productivity and connection.
Implications for organizations if some employees are inherently disengaged. Engaging these workers may require new approaches. Disengaged workers may need more help, feedback, and recognition. Organizations should also check whether lousy management, lack of praise, or other factors add to employee disengagement. Organizations may need to hire engaged workers. This hiring may include analyzing demeanor and other personal traits during the hiring process (Hejjas et al., 2018). Companies should start by building an engagement mindset to attract and retain engaged workers. Organizations must realize that employee engagement is not simply the employee's duty. Organizational issues can also affect staff engagement. Organizations can improve engagement and disengagement tactics by knowing the role of individual and group factors (Hejjas et al., 2018). Fostering a culture of engagement improves employee well-being, job happiness, productivity, quality, and corporate success.
Conclusion
Different tactics and methods can be developed by organizations to end apathy. One essential component of encouraging employee involvement is developing an engaging atmosphere. Organizations can cultivate a feeling of loyalty and belonging among their staff by fostering a positive work atmosphere that promotes employee involvement and cooperation. Another critical tactic for fostering engagement is offering chances for employee growth. Employee engagement and motivation are likelier to be high when they feel appreciated and involved. Giving employees training and development chances can also help them develop their skills and competencies, which will help them progress in their careers and enjoy their work more. Promoting staff involvement also requires effective communication. Clear and open lines of communication among staff members can encourage confidence and cooperation, boost their level of work satisfaction and productivity, and eventually help the company succeed. Companies need to use various tactics to end employee disengagement and encourage involvement. While some workers may already be apathetic, organizational variables can also play a role.
Essay 2 (Qn. 5): Enhancing Business Strategy through Learning and Development Interventions
Introduction
Enhancing employee abilities, knowledge, and conduct in companies requires learning and development (L&D) initiatives. They include projects, activities, and programs to enhance worker productivity, encourage learning, and foster company expansion. Organizations encounter a variety of difficulties in the fast-paced business climate of today, including heighten...