CR4015. Module Title: Criminal Justice Process.(Criminology) Law Essay
Assessments MUST be properly referenced and MUST include a bibliography. Adequacy of referencing will form part of the marking criteria. Please also use a 11 or 12 size text, double space between lines and edit prior to submission.
Coursework Assessment Details and Instructions
NOTE: This essay assessment is designed to replace the 100% exam for this module to comply with the suspension of face to face examinations in response to COVID-19. It meets the same learning aims and outcomes.
Module Code: CR4015
Module Title: Criminal Justice Process
Percentage contribution to overall Module Mark: CR4015: 100%
Word Length:
CR4001: 2,000 words
DEADLINE DATE: : To be submitted to TURNITIN any beforehand but NO LATER than 3pm on 15 June 2020(NO hard copy submission is required – just through Turnitin only)
PLEASE ENSURE YOU TYPE YOUR STUDENT ID NUMBER AT THE TOP OF THE FIRST PAGE OF YOUR COURSEWORK – NOT YOUR NAME
** Turnitin Information: Submit within website for the module on MOODLE
PLEASE NOTE:
• Students are required to submit an electronic copy of their coursework to the Turnitin assignment facility which is located within the website for the module on Moodle.
• Students are required to keep for their records a copy of the first page only of the Turnitin digital receipt. The digital receipt is automatically sent to your mail inbox in the corresponding section for the module on Moodle.
• NO hard copy of coursework is required – just through Turnitin only.
WARNING - PLAGIARISM AND COLLUSION:
You are reminded that it is a breach of University Assessment regulations to copy or use another person’s work without proper acknowledgement. It is also a breach of regulations for two or more students to present the same or substantially similar piece of work. Any student who is found to be in breach of assessment regulations will be subject to an appropriate penalty (ranging from failure of the relevant unit to expulsion from the University).
A breach of assessment regulations cannot be excused by ignorance or external pressures.
No part of your work, except where clearly quoted and referenced (ie: correct use of quotation marks and footnotes etc.), may be copied from material belonging to any other person. You should employ a consistent referencing system throughout your work. eg:
Books: author, title, place of publication, publisher and date
Articles: author, title, journal, volume, year and first and last page numbers
Edited works: author, title of chapter followed by "in" editor(s), name of the work, place of publication, publisher, date and first and last page numbers of the chapterQuotations: require the above detail plus appropriate page numbers
For further information about plagiarism and collusion, please consult your Programme Handbook or your Academic Guidance Tutor. For information on referencing, please consult the Study Skills Handbook.
For guidance on plagiarism and collusion from online sources, check the originality report of your Turnitin submission.This piece of coursework will be assessed by reference to the following criteria:
1. Engagement with the academic literature
2. Understanding of the topic area
3. Good academic practice in relation to proper referencing
4. Ability to answer the question set and to ensure that all content is relevant to the question
5. Ability to construct a coherent argument within the word limit
6. Ability to construct a coherent essay structure
Learning Outcomes for the module
At the end of this module, students will be able to:
Knowledge
1 Demonstrate knowledge of the structure, role and function of the process of criminal justice administration (IC)
2. Demonstrate an understanding of the political, social and cultural context of criminal justice agencies (CC)
Thinking skills
3 Provide a critical analysis of current criminal justice policy in relation to adult offenders (COI)
4 Evaluate court procedure and identify key legal issues (COI)
Subject-based practical skills
5 Select and prioritise materials from a range of sources (DP)
6 Demonstrate an ability to synthesise knowledge and provide verbal feedback.
Skills for life and mental wealth
7 Demonstrate skills of analysis, evaluation and application of procedures to given factual situations (EID,SID,CID)
Instructions to Students:
PLEASE NOTE: Assessments MUST be properly referenced and MUST include a bibliography. Adequacy of referencing will form part of the marking criteria. Please also use a 11 or 12 size text, double space between lines and edit prior to submission. Please choose and complete ONE of the following essay question options.
1. Is Criminal Justice in Britain best described as a System or Process? Demonstrate that you understand both arguments and explain your answer using examples. 2. Compare, contract and critically evaluate the Due Process and Crime Control models of criminal justice. Answer with reference to specific agencies and processes. 3. What is the history of ‘Policing by Consent’ and how does it relate and apply to contemporary policing in Britain? 4. Do the police need to have wide discretion in the exercise of their powers, and what problems can result from granting such discretionary powers to the police?5. Why do miscarriages of justice occur and how are they dealt with? Answer with reference to at least two examples studied in class.
4. Do the police need to have wide discretion in the exercise of their powers, and what problems can result from granting such discretionary powers to the police? (Criminology)
THE NEED FOR POLICE TO HAVE WIDE DISCRETION IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR POWERS, AND THE PROBLEMS THAT CAN RESULT FROM GRANTING SUCH DISCRETIONARY POWERS TO THEM
Student's Name
Course
Professor's name
Institutional Affiliation
State (City)
Date
Wide Police Discretion Powers
Discretion refers to a given power to law enforcers in making their own decisions concerning the matter. The law enforcement officers enjoy the freedom and privileges to behave in compliance with their police authority to interrupt, detain, and use force on a detainee. Discretion requires the desire and the capacity to make choices, which is as ambiguous as the definition of police authority. As a proportion of all police that a citizen encounters, police authority is rarely invoked. Officers regard their power as a resource in situations of "treatment," and often they can deal with situations without recourse to legitimate positions. Discretion is warranted to decide on whether to search, whether to arrest someone or to assist somebody. However, police discretion is not warranted where an authority has already issued a warrant of arrest. Here, the difference is that discretion is warranted when an unforeseeable event happens during the Police officer's time of duty. Thus, a decision has to be made timely to prevent further harm. In contrast, the discretion will not be necessary where a decision has already been made, and the only remaining task is that of the effecting the decision.
Discretion means the ability to make choices and decisions. For instance, the Courts of Law have the option to decide whether or not to allow an amendment of pleadings. However, in the context of policing, discretion means power that is rendered to law enforcement officers to make their own decisions concerning the matter at hand (Myhill and Johnson 2016, p.10). As a general rule, Police Officers are expected to conduct their duties following Written Laws and Regulations. However, unforeseen situations require Police Officers to exercise their discretion to prevent further harm while performing their duties. This leeway allows for some flexibility in ensuring adherence to the existing laws. Police discretion is often necessary when the involved officer has to decide whether to conduct a search, arrest someone, assist someone, or issue a traffic ticket. An example of this situation is when an officer sees a vehicle being driven without headlights in the course of his duty. After stopping the driver, the officer needs to decide whether to issue a traffic ticket. After confirming whether the driver has had a previous record or their record is clean, that decision will be made. A practical example concerns the situation in the United States, Canada, Italy, and the United Kingdom. These few countries have issued curfew and partial or total lockdown s during the on-going health pandemic. When a Police Officer finds an idle person loitering on the streets, the officer will have to exercise his or her discretion in deciding whether to arrest the person or issue a warning.
Importance and Need for Discretion
As professionals who have undergone adequate training, the police officers need absolute discretion doing their jobs in the enforcement of the law. However, dispensing this critical element in policing requires strong oversight by citizens. Also, there is a unique need for punishing those officers who stray and go beyond the limits. Police discretion works well where there is a good citizen review board, working independently and separate from the police force. Europe, for instance, there has been recent public outcries form citizens. The matter seems to have escalated as some police officers act like anything they do is right and acceptable or is within the law. Some cops believe nothing will happen to them when they abuse their power. However, it is desperate and, therefore, immaterial to imagine that a police department can exist with discretion being banned because there could be the problem of people getting arrested for petty crimes. With police discretion, the officers have a say on whether or not someone gets arrested for minor offenses, without which juveniles may be reprimanded from time to time without solid grounds (Greer et al. 2020, p. 4).
The different levels of discretions deal with the varying situations in which they are used. Some may include domestic-based violence situations, violations of traffic, possible crimes on hate, or crimes involving individuals with mental illnesses. Domestic-based violence may be characterized by just verbal abuse (Myhill 2016, p. 7). In cases not evidenced by any signs of physical attacks such as bruises, it may be hard to determine who commenced it and who worsened it. Thus, the police officer applies judgment on the situation on whether to make an arrest and who to arrest. Also, for traffic violations, because so many people speed, the police officer might apply their discretion to issue a caution instead of filing paperwork. This element has spared valid cases where a driver unintentionally exceeds the recommended speed limit is genuinely apologetic.
For potential hate crimes, the officer may use their police discretion in determining if a crime contains elements of hate. These kinds of crimes are hard to decide on by evidence alone. Hence, the police officers have to judge the perpetrator's character for crimes that involve individuals with mental illness. A person of unsound mind is not charged usually because the law assumes that they may have perpetrated rime when they were not in control of themselves (Aplin 2019, p. 11). Police discretion comes in handy, especially when the police have to judge the individual's state of mind when the crime was being committed, as seen in cases involving drunken citizens. Police discretion may be the vast reason behind perceive racial based profiling. Certainly, cops get trained for using discretion policy alongside with perceived statistics. It is always easy to notice this observation among persons of individual races distant from the possibility of being rendered guilt-ridden for crimes. However, this argument plays a role in deciding that much discretion can't be banned in police departments.
Police discretion is used in most detective divisions. A detective decides on whether to stop an investigation of crimes as a result of the absence of leads for seeking a search warrant, conducting stakeouts, and questioning or choosing when to questioning possible suspects (Barlow and Walklate 2020, p. 408). When it comes to the patrol officer's role, the discre...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
Set out together with your reasoning how any of the parties might be able to bring a claim u...
4 pages/≈1100 words | No Sources | Harvard | Law | Essay |
-
Land Law Landlord and Tenant Law Essay Research Paper
5 pages/≈1375 words | No Sources | Harvard | Law | Essay |
-
Youth Justice. Compare & contrast the two main responses to youth crime during the 20th cent...
5 pages/≈1375 words | No Sources | Harvard | Law | Essay |