100% (1)
Pages:
14 pages/≈3850 words
Sources:
30
Style:
Harvard
Subject:
Law
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.K.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 60.48
Topic:

Human trafficking

Essay Instructions:
this is an essay style question, please have a very good read of all the lecture slides. the question is in a document labelled "question and assessment brief" it includes what should be included in the essay and what outcomes should be reached please read carefully. i have attached all the materials you will need for this please also include a bibliography. all other documents that are NOT labelled "lecture .." are resources you should include when referencing. please beware i am a UK student so please make sure that this essay is written in a UK manner with UK wording and please use the resource i have attached when writing it. it also requires Harvard style referencing. if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. the deadline is the 26th but please if possible i would like to have it earlier to proof read it and make sure it is okay. Thank you.
Essay Sample Content Preview:
HUMAN TRAFFICKING By [Insert Your Name] Class Name Professor University State and City Date Introduction Smuggling, human trafficking, and modern slavery are some of the most severe human rights violations that go unresolved at the global level (Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, 2012, p.6). Great Britain took the lead in the struggle against such atrocities because of its controversial past, whose ties to the transatlantic slave trade and colonization are solid. These dynamics vary between the history of the UK and the present state, ranging from the trafficking of vulnerable people in modern society to the exploitation of enslaved Africans in the past (Iselin & Adams, 2003, p.3). To tackle human trafficking and modern slavery with efficiency, there is a need to understand the historical causes, current dynamics, cooperation methods, and their integration into globalization, migration, and economic gaps (UCL Department of History, 2024). This essay will scrutinize the UK’s role in dealing with contemporary slavery, smuggling, and human trafficking and suggest solutions that can be implemented. This essay evaluates how governmental and non-governmental bodies tackle these crimes by focusing on historical context, legislative frameworks, law enforcement responses, victim care, and multi-country cooperation.  Historical Context: Contributions to the Problem The British history of its involvement in human trafficking and modern slavery was built in its colonial past, especially during the transatlantic slave trade. The bicentennial of the British abolition of the slave trade has the potency of being a powerful reminder of the historical struggle that the nation underwent with human exploitation, as noted by Tibbles (2008, p.294). It was mostly the British ships that transported Africans who were held as slaves to the Americas. This was one of the crucial contributors to laying ground and growth of the plantation economies based on forced labour. Slavery has left several legacies, among them racial prejudice and economic inequalities, that still affect people in different parts of the globe. The market for humans that existed during colonialism laid a foundation for modern forms of human trafficking as well as slavery. Quirk (2006, p. 567) argues that slavery in the past is linked to today's global inequality and victimisation. An example is the existence of the hierarchical structures of power and exploitation that occurred during the time of colonialism that still exists in postcolonial countries, which contributed to people's vulnerability to human trafficking and forced labour. The continued inequality that was a result of historical injustices of the past is reflected in poverty and the exploitation of marginalised communities, both in the United Kingdom and in its former colonies (Banks, 2012, p.293). Additionally, there are deeply embedded historical roots associated with using socially disadvantaged people as economic pawns within the UK countries. By using the Somerset case and the English slave system's termination as a guide, Cotter (1994, p.32) highlights atrocities in the UK and how they were prevalent at the time. The exploitation itself took several different forms, which ranged from forced employment through child labour to the form of the system known as indentured servitude. That phenomenon lasted long after the formal abolition of slavery in the United Kingdom in the 19th century. It could, however, be the past that is influencing the present as the enslaved experience, and this, therefore, means that traffickers exploit the situation to make money (Bosworth & Kellezi, 2017, p.121). Moreover, the UK's colonial history interacts with contemporary immigration trends and policies. Gross-Wyrtzen and Gazzotti (2021, p. 827) give the postcolonial lens on migration policies a humanistic perspective, emphasising the impact that colonial legacy has on current border control. Often, the policies that define border control in countries influenced by the colonial mentality tend to highlight the issue of securitisation at the expense of human rights. Their integration into the host society becomes problematic, and they face a higher risk of human rights violations and abuses. In contemporary society, the utilisation of migration control techniques still keeps in view the past creation of "others" along racialised lines as cheap labour, hence engendering exploitative and exclusionary patterns (Alpert & Chin, 2017, p.383). Moreover, the commodification of human beings is a significant component of modern supply chains, which influences the spread of this type of exploitation globally. Pinheiro et al. (2019, p. 167) examine how regulations impact the supply chain and their susceptibility to slavery in the modern world. Seams and the absence of effective control allow the system of supply chains to become the subject of ongoing violations of human rights, even when the regulations have been developed to solve the exploitation problem (Voss et al., 2019, p. 61). The ancient heritage of treating human beings as a product to boost economic gain became an issue that modern business practices continue to use even up to this day, and thus intensify exploitation and trafficking (United Nations, 2023). The UK has carried out many profound contributions to the current problem of modern slavery and human trafficking as majorly linked to its colonial history. Historical injustices remain the genetic roots of today's patterns of exploitation, from the transatlantic slave trade to house labour exploitation. An acknowledgement of historical injustice, addressing systematic inequality, and destroying exploitation systems that have existed for centuries as a result of colonisation and imperialism are among the measures that should be taken to correct past wrongs (Iselin & Adams, 2003, p.7). The key to powerful remedies to human trafficking and slavery of today is to provide a holistic historical context. Modern-Day Challenges and UK's Response Contributions to the Problem The United Kingdom's colonial past still echoes today in some of the modern-day issues and made specific essential contributions to the history of human trafficking and modern slavery. In the transatlantic slave trade, British ships mainly transported millions of enslaved Africans to the Americas (Historic Hudson Valley). Tibbles (2008, p.297) portrays the UK's significant contribution to the Triangular Trade. This brutal trade not only led to the death of many people but also set up the foundation of the economic imbalances and systemic racism that are still apparent in modern society. Not only did the colonial powers extract labour from Europe in return for finances, but they also created a framework of exploitation that still affects the labour relations approach all around the world. Furthermore, the legacy of Great Britain's colonialism is not only about the transatlantic slave trade but also covers many different types of labour exploitation within its colonies. Quirk (2006, p.567) discusses how the unequal past, including past servitude and forced labour in the colonial industry, gave rise to the deep-rooted patterns of exploitation today. For instance, the ways Britain developed class divisions of Indian Americans had created or worsened suppression of the poor people, which they were using as a means of exploiting them economically. These communities are still the primary victims of contemporary slavery and trafficking; thus, the impact of these historical injustices will remain for a very long time. The Somerset case by Cotter (1994, p.42) is also an evident instance of this abuse. Although the institution of slavery was declared abolished by the 19th century in Britain, labour exploitation persisted with impunity, especially in industries like mining and textiles. Furthermore, the Industrial Revolution meant that there was a demand for cheap labour, causing women and children to work in factories under horrible conditions. Systematic exploitation of vulnerable groups through economic gains occurred due to those historical injustices, which were the building blocks of the present labour exploitation (HM Government). Furthermore, dehumanization led people into the colonial and postcolonial contexts through the commodification that brought about individuals' exploitation in these places. Gross-Wyrtzen and Gazzotti (2021, p. 828) illustrate how colonial notions of superiority, in addition to being a justification for holding native communities as enslaved people, also led to the loss of lands and means of subsistence. Therefore, owing to such displacement, poverty-stricken populations move to find economic subsistence, which still contributes significantly to today's massive migration patterns (Gazzotti, 2021, p.444). Often, these migrations provide cases which are targeted by traffickers and smugglers who take advantage of weak people who are in search of better opportunities as a platform for this purpose. According to Pinheiro et al. (2019, p. 171), there are contemporary supply chains have a significant effect on the global scale of human trafficking. In supply chain management, some trends create and sustain workers' exploitation in the agriculture and garment-making sectors. These measures are being implemented precisely because regulatory regimes have been put in place to minimize the incidence of modern slavery. Migrant farm labourers, for example, often find themselves trapped in a cycle of debt servitude and practice of exploitation that closely resembles forced labour on plantations just as they existed centuries ago (Historic Hudson Valley). The UK, as a former colonial country and ex-colonial state, has made remarkable historical contributions to the issue of human trafficking and modern slavery. Such contributions form a part of the country's heritage. The transatlantic slave trade and the exploitation of indigenous communities are two historical injustices that still impact present-day patterns of exploitation. This can be achieved by admitting to the lingering effects of colonialism, fighting against the existing inequality and implementing thorough countermeasures to guard against modern slavery (Gazzotti, 2021, p.447). To devise efficient measures to remove these persistent crimes, we need to have a complete history of the environment in which they took place to understand the historic environment. Response to Preventing and Responding to Human Trafficking Legislative Framework The Modern Slavery Act (2015) is the foundation of the United Kingdom's comprehensive legal framework that covers a broad range of issues concerning contemporary slavery, human trafficking, and illegal smuggling (Tullo, 2015, p.11). The law has several elements intended to inhibit similar acts, shield the victims, and help prosecution. According to Haynes (2016, p.33), the legislative environment is analysed, and the Modern Slavery Act, the most critical legislation, becomes the guiding factor for adopting and harmonising the existing laws. This Act, for instance, adds the "Duty to Notify" notion, which requires some public agencies to notify the Home Office about the victims they may have found during their job (Home Office, 2024). Furthermore, the Modern Slavery Act of 2015 has provisions that can be used to enhance supply chain transparency (Tullo, 2015, p.19). The goal of the rules is to make sure companies answer for any exploitation taking place within their workplace. In their consideration of modern slavery’s impact on supply chain management, Pinheiro et al. (2019, p.175) pay attention to the importance of transparency in the struggle against modern slavery. For example, Section 54 of the Act obliges corporations exceeding a specific threshold to submit yearly accounts detailing their steps to ensure a modern slavery-free supply chain (Voss et al., 2019, p. 68). On the contrary, academics have argued that companies have difficulties interpreting and implementing these regulations. Indeed, it points to the need for more transparent guidance and methods of regulation. Law Enforcement Police organisa...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!