Essay

ANALYSIS OF “SUBJECTIVATION” AND ITS POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS IN EVERYDAY LIFE Name of Student Course Professor Name University Date Analysis of “Subjectivation” and its Political Implications in Everyday Life Subjectivation is the basis for a deeper understanding of the relationships that limit our everyday lives’ identity and political space. This concept dates back to the philosophy of Descartes in the seventeenth century, which is based on the idea that an individual is a person who can think and perceive (Nagengast and Kearney, 1990). On the other hand, the whole new development of history has been criticized since it did not consider different ways of life, including those that were based on gender, race, lesbian-gay-bisexual (LGB), class, and age. The discussion as a result of this ensues to explain the multidimensional ways in which daily living is political and how the concept of subjectivation helps to grasp politics on a micro-level. Subjectivation through Multiple Discourses The subjectivation concept uses various discourses to bring forth the impressive process of building different unique identities. Class, sex, race, age and sexuality, for example, are maximal discourses that mould personality (Oberprantacher and Siclodi, 2016). This complexity is not tackled by the Cartesian approach, which is genderless and universalized, as it needs to consider that people are not genderless in real life and have different subjectivities (Bernstein, 2005). On the other hand, the disagreement arises due to Descartes’ inability to acknowledge the exclusive difficulties and contexts that people from different social markers usually face. According to Youdell (2006), subjectivation encompasses learner identities, subcultural identities, biographical identities, and individual awareness. In this, personal memories, social or cultural linkages, and interactive education serve as the ingredients for cooking an individual selfhood. Youdell’s investigation proves that “subjectivation” is a pattern that people will rarely learn about just because of the interaction of several factors or processes. In this case, it is actualised in various discourses, which capture in a broader social context how people give their meaning out of these possibilities, decisions, negotiations, and rejections (Traue and Pfahl, 2022). This occurrence approach to looking at how social influences and identity markers define individuals while being simultaneously defined by them leads predictably to a deeper comprehension of subjectivation. Identity Politics in Daily Experiences Through race, gender, sexual orientation, and class, it is easy to identify certain ideals that play a vital role in shaping lives. And in return, these relationships add more colours to the complexity of identity politics (Vilchez et al., 2020). These common denominations form the nature of who individuals are, irrespective of the enduring stereotypes, racism, and the exercise of privileges they face daily. The crucial part of the complexity between political systems and individual subjectivities is a phenomenon of the identity and larger society’s social categories (Brunila and Rossi, 2017). An individual is often stereotyped into a specific category according to their identity, usually set up celebrating or denigrating as per the polarized norms of the customs (Davies, 2006). Discrimination creates the fact that people form their personalities and interactions by reflecting their political side and how it affects their attitudes toward others either directly or in a covert manner. For a society to lack prejudice and biases, an understanding of intersectionality and a recognition of the significant impact that social norms have on an individual’s life lie at the heart of empathy cultivation, disparity elimination, and outright discrimination advancement in diversity and inclusion. Power and Subjectivation in Everyday Life Power comes hand in hand with every crisis, issue, or leadership society faces, be it on the family, business, or community level. Decisions of who and the ways power is distributed alongside opportunities access are linked to power structures. Besides, gender roles influence how tasks are carried out in the family without directly focusing on them, which clearly illustrates the political character of seemingly personal relationships (Dawney, 2013). The work environment consists of power dynamics and two levels of authority: the superior and subordinate, further affecting agency and professional courses. The interface displayed in subjects as the external world and discipline them into complying with the power dynamics is evident in how they flourish in power. According to this analysis, subjectivity is a forceful issue in power structures such as concessions, life issues, and the government (Goffey, 2022). In the apparatus of governance, also understood as an institutional authority, standards and doctrines are achieved. These create another dimension of subjectivation by forming appropriate behavioural norms and duties. The remarkable book “Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison” by Foucault (1995) provides enjoyment by allowing people to see how outside forces affect daily behaviours. Being disciplines and management tools for conducting business in professional settings and hierarchical structures are the power means. At work, it follows the micro-world with strict adherence to r...