100% (1)
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
4
Style:
Chicago
Subject:
History
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 18
Topic:

Socioeconomic and Political Crises of Modern China and the Solutions Offered

Essay Instructions:

Please choose TWO from the following three questions. Limit your answers to no more than TWO SINGLE-SPACED PAGES per question. Please cite sources wherever necessary or appropriate.

 1.    What socioeconomic and political crises of modern China did the Communist-led revolution attempt to address? How adequate (or inadequate) were the solutions offered by the Chinese Communist movement, which brought about a new state in 1949?

2.    Discuss the origins, processes, and consequences of the Great Leap Forward. 

3.    How do we situate the Cultural Revolution in the context of the 20th-century Chinese Revolution as a whole? What were the objectives of the Cultural Revolution as Mao conceived it, and did the Cultural Revolution accomplish its goals?

Essay Sample Content Preview:

MODERN CHINESE HISTORY
Name
Class Information
Date
Modern Chinese History
1 What Socioeconomic and Political Crises of Modern China did the Communist-Led Revolution Attempt to Address?
During the revolution, wars were nearly nonstop, and the Chinese people suffered enormously. Inflation, which had begun in the initial stages of the war, became pervasive in the postwar era, bankrupting the middle class by reducing wages and depleting savings (Esherick 2001, 2). Discontent with the Guomindang grew with Japan's Ichigo Offensive, and it spread quickly during the Civil War. Land reform emphasized the class-based revolution arguments that had gained popularity after the restoration operations of 1942-44 in Communist zones. The Communists' Eighth Route Army's strength and impact increased rapidly across northern and northeastern China. From the warfare until the Civil War period, the army, socioeconomic, and political variables that shaped societal dynamics remained remarkably consistent (Johnson 1962, 3). Nonetheless, as they achieved Victory over Japan in 1945, many Chinese had higher expectations for peace and stability.
Social trends in the Communist and Guomindang-controlled territories were very distinct because of China's political and diplomatic divergence. This distinction did not imply that the movement merely entailed breaking the Guomindang social hierarchy and replacing it with something acquired from the Communists' rural roots. Instead, there were significant similarities in the two areas' social transformation and critical ways in which the seeds of the changing era were growing amid the rotting of the old (Esherick 2001, 3). The Civil War expedited the transition from the cross-class United Front regulations of the initial war period to the more class-cognizant measures of the mid-1940s (Pepper 2004, 106). The laws' core logic changed as well. During the war, pleas to fund rebellion against the Japanese invaders validated the high burden of taxes on the wealthy. Nevertheless, the United Front welcomed patriotic landowners as its members during the war.
Land reforms drove the aim of progressive transformation in Communist countries, which progressed through various periods of radical advancement, rectification, and gradual stabilization. Land reforms in North China were a large and complicated undertaking that impacted many peasants (Meisner and Matthias 1999, 90). Despite being driven by central party directions, it assumed various shapes in diverse communities as local actors aimed to profit from widespread social unrest. However, there was one underlying principle: it pushed class awareness with extraordinary zeal, designating class position with labels that would remain for centuries and impact lives for decades. The most significant element of this approach regarding social outline was eradicating the rural elite's economic foundation and forming a rural setting where all peasants held equal landholdings. Other initiatives for mutual support groups and different aspects of production exchanges aimed to make equipment and draft animals more accessible to the general public. Land reform resulted in a fundamental redistribution of financial resources in these ways. The socio-cultural impact of land reforms was also significant since it informed peasants of the significance of the new class titles.
Solutions Offered by the Chinese Communist Movement
When the Republic of China officially established itself in 1949, only about a fifth of China's villages had implemented land reforms. The Communists were dead set on extending the movement from the ancient revolutionary strongholds over the vast countryside that had only lately come under their authority (Meisner and Matthias 1999, 205). They wanted to accomplish it rapidly. This decision was motivated by more than an intellectual desire to end rigid socioeconomic connections in remote regions. Important political and economic factors were also engaged. Besides, structural reform was necessary to keep the new government's predictable ways intact. Land reform had to be made universal for two reasons. First, it would eliminate the land-owning class, strengthen communist political legitimacy within villages, and foster the establishment of a centralized state with tight, adequate supervision over the countryside. Second, land redistribution was necessary for economic well-being (Young 1986, 61). Communists anticipated it would boost agriculture productivity and lay the groundwork for a communist reform of the rural in the future.
Conclusion
Although the Communist Revolution mainly evaded a significant proportion of rural dwellers, it had far-reaching implications for the Chinese system. The continuation of war, recession, and political turmoil had significant societal ramifications for them. The anticipation that the end of the war would herald the start of a new era resulted in a painful and robust disillusionment with the wartime-postwar continuation. The Civil War created class divisions quickly and clearly and pitted landowners against one another. The goal was to rally the party's rural poor support. The reasoning was to offer impoverished people land as ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!