Essay Available:
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
0
Style:
Chicago
Subject:
History
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.2
Topic:
Theory of Intelligentsia and the Theory of Technology by Tosaka Jun
Essay Instructions:
Hi,
I want two one-page response paper.
First paper should refer to the article called
"Theory of Intelligentsia and the Theory of Techonology" by Tosaka Jun. Since the article is not well translated, I'll upload the lecture notes on this article which you can have clear ideas of this reading.
Second paper should refer to two articles; "The Audible Past" by Sterne, and "Mimesis and Alterity" by Taussig.
The short essays are NOT book reports or even summaries of the texts; they are meant to represent your critical thinking on the text(s) or discussion from class, and you must argue your point and back it up with specific reference to the text(s) or class discussion. If you refer to the texts, please use standard footnote protocol (cf Chicago Manual).
Also, the short essays are not simply your opinions; they demonstrate that you have digested and internalized important concepts, arguments, or theses of the texts.
Thank you.
Essay Sample Content Preview:
RESPONSE PAPER
Name:
Grade Course:
Tutor`s Name:
(10 March 2012)
1st Paper
Theory of Intelligentsia and the Theory of Technology" by Tosaka Jun
The technology theory according to Tosaka Jun appears to be a major representation in the science theory, as it marks a very important point in his materialism aspect as a critique of Kyoto School of philosophy. Tosaka has analyzed different forms of technique as well as technology in a general form. In his argument, Tosaka has used the vernacular word gijutsu differently to mean different things. This has helped him to ensure that accounts for ideational, potential as well as subjective intendances of technique have been have accounted for in a manner that accommodates each other. In doing this, Tosaka is bring out the what can be referred to as paradigmatic ontology standpoint which asserts the significance of present as well as actual reality.
In analyzing social science in technology, he incorporated historical materialism which states that material base of production forces and relationships that decides what he calls super structure, which includes the formation of ideologies. In looking at the main components of technology, Tosaka includes infrastructure and technology growth, which together leads to increased production force resulting to working class emancipation. As a result, his argument relates to what is stated by Moish Postone, when stating that the determinants of technology production forces together with production mode. However, Postone insisted that production mode does not depend on capitalism.
By looking at these arguments, I state he clearly describes categorical differences and ranks between potential and actual as well as reality and ideality. He points out that ideal and real can neither be s...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now: