Pontiac’s War, Its Causes, Course and Consequences

Pontiac’s War, Its Causes, Course and Consequences
Student Name
Department
Course Code
Submission Date
Pontiac’s War: Its Causes, Course, and Consequence, 1763-1765 is a highly interesting retell of some of the most crucial important turning points that shaped the history of colonialism in America. It tells the history of the country during the time when the Native Americans staged what is considered among the most successful and effective campaigns witnessed in Europe in the three centuries. In this book, Richard Middleton presents a rather balanced and unbiased recount of the execution and organization of this rather crucial war and rebellion, and thus gives a glimpse of how the this military group which demanded that the British forces that were in the country reinstated diplomacy as a way of working towards retaining their mandate and control over the area. Overall, spotlighting of the Native American perspective shows that in Pontiac’s War, Richard Middleton presents an engaging and careful account of the extent to which the organized Native American forces almost achieved ultimate success in their pursuit of independence from the British imperial forces in their land.
In ‘Pontiac's War', the author, Richard Middleton , argues that was among the most effective and successful rebellions that were staged by the Indians living in the eastern part of North America during the three centuries when European contact was experienced in the region (p. ix). This is a claim that most scholars find hard to dispute, but until the time when Richard Middleton’s ‘Pontiac's War' was published, there was no single scholar who had been so determined to pursue the diplomatic and military history of the war with the aim of showing the extent to which the First Nations almost achieved their overall dream of driving the British imperial forces out of the trans-Appalachian west.
Immediately after the breakout of the war in May 1763, Richard Middleton writes that nine British forts were captured by the warriors leading the war. The warriors were so fierce and successful in the fight that the only forts that held out against being captured by the multinational forces which were arrayed against them were Pitt, Detroit, and Niagara (p. 166). The writer also argues that even in the areas where the warriors failed to register victory against the British imperial forces, the British generals had other issues of their own that they forced. For instance, they lacked the appropriate resources and this meant that they lacked the capacity to efficiently convince the other colonials so that they could share the human and financial costs that they incurred as a result of the war. As a result, this rendered the British armies incapable of launching any counter-offensives which were as effective as the ones launched by their attackers.
The British armies lacked the military and financial muscle to effectively fight their enemies. As a result, the British imperial forces entered into a series of negotiations that resulted in numerous treaties that they signed with their attackers in 1764 and 1765. The treaties played for the positive for the British as they helped in ending the fighting between the two groups, but part of the agreement was that the British could neither punish Pontiac nor his followers despite the severe attacks that they launched against the British. In this case, it is evident how Richard Middleton gives a battle-by-battle account of the series of events that unfolded during that time, and this helps him in providing a rather balanced and unbiased retell of the sprawling conflict that took place between the two groups.
Something particular about Richard Middleton is that he seeks to reassess the contribution of the different Indian communities and nations towards the conflict in empowering the warriors, and most of these nations have not been assessed adequately in the past in existing literature (p. ix). This also shows the accessible and compact overview of the conflict that the author gives to the readers, and thus offering an entirely original and unique interpretation to the extent of engaging already established historiographical debates. However, he achieves this through primarily focusing on the military of the First Nations as well as the diplomatic achievements that they got during the war rather than restoring a sense of comprehension and understanding to a subject that is now familiar.
One of the greatest achievements for Richard Middleton in this book is the manner in which he portrays his capacity to create a narrative unity on a rather complex conflict which involved various groups and that was staged over a large landscape in the eastern part of North America. There are two related and interpretive choices which the author’s ability possible. The first is that in the text, Middleton is successful in restoring Pontiac to a rather central position within the conflict which is named after him. Notably, Pontiac was once demoted from his position as a pan-Indian leader by Howard Peckham to the position of a local war chief, and this sparked debate among scholars on whether or not the conflict was depending on one mind only (Pontiac's) or its success was attributed to a numerous engagements and discussions that were directed by leaders who were prominent in the region. Although Richard Middleton recognizes and appreciates that power in the aboriginal societies was diffused and thus prevented the possibility of a single individual taking control, he draws the conclusion that Pontiac had an almost universal influence in the area during the conflict (p. 185). The second factor is that Richard Middleton puts across the arguments that the First Nations acted i...