The Oppressed Majority Paper

In a 2 to 3 page paper, choose a notable woman. This notable woman can be from history or the present and from any country or ethnic background. The following website contains Mini-Biographies about a variety of women that may help with your selection of a notable woman to write about: Women's History Mini BIOs.Links to an external site. Document the following: Why you chose this woman Her lifespan Where she resided (resides) Summarize her early life Summarize the reason why she was (is) notable How are you inspired by this person? You are required to use at least three outside sources. At least two outside sources are required. Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and should not be cited. All assignments are required to use APA style, be error-free (grammar and spelling count), have one-inch margins, and include a cover page and reference page. Additionally, an introduction, body, and conclusion are also required. Attachment: Week 6 The Oppressed Majority PaperDownload Week 6 The Oppressed Majority Paper Rubric SOC 304 Week 6 Oppressed Majority Paper Rubric SOC 304 Week 6 Oppressed Majority Paper Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1. Documenting why you chose this woman. 10 pts EXEMPLARY Thorough documentation of why you chose this woman. Providing several detailed reasons for your choice. 9.1 pts GOOD 8.2 pts SATISFACTORY Adequate documentation of why you chose this woman. Providing sufficient reasons for your choice, reasons may or may not be detailed. 7.3 pts MARGINAL 6.4 pts UNSATISFACTORY Insufficient documentation of why you chose this woman. Providing nominal reasons for your choice, reasons lacked detail. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2. Documenting the lifespan. 10 pts Comprehensive documentation of the lifespan of the woman you chose 9.1 pts GOOD 8.2 pts Satisfactory documentation of the lifespan of the woman you chose 7.3 pts MARGINAL 6.4 pts Incomplete documentation of the lifespan of the woman you chose. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3. Documenting where the woman you chose resided (resides). 10 pts Complete description of where the woman you chose resided (resides). 9.1 pts GOOD 8.2 pts Satisfactory description of where the woman you chose resided (resides). 7.3 pts MARGINAL 6.4 pts Inadequate description of where the woman you chose resided (resides). 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome4. Summarizing the early life. 10 pts Descriptive summary of the early life of the woman you chose. Summary includes important details and specific events. 9.1 pts GOOD 8.2 pts Sufficient summary of the early life of the woman you chose, summary provides adequate details. 7.3 pts MARGINAL 6.4 pts Insufficient summary of the early life of the woman you chose. Summary lacks clarity and detail. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5. Summarizing the reason why she was (is) notable. 10 pts Comprehensive description of why she was (is) notable. Description provides several detailed reasons. 9.1 pts GOOD 8.2 pts Adequate description of why you believe she was (is) notable. 7.3 pts MARGINAL 6.4 pts Vague description of why you believe she was (is) notable. Description provides few reasons and or reasons are unclear. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome6. Explaining why you are inspired by this person. 10 pts Explicit explanation of why you are inspired by this person. Explanation includes several reasons. 9.1 pts GOOD 8.2 pts Sufficient explanation of why you are inspired by this person. 7.3 pts MARGINAL 6.4 pts Limited explanation of why you are inspired by this person. Explanation lacks clarity and detail. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome7. Grammar 10 pts No grammatical errors 9.1 pts GOOD 8.2 pts Several grammatical errors (3-4) (fragmented sentences, run on or confusing sentences, subject-verb disagreement, ill-formed verbs, pronoun errors, possessive errors, extra, wrong or missing word) 7.3 pts MARGINAL 6.4 pts There were significant grammar (more than 8) mistakes (fragmented sentences, run on or confusing sentences, subject-verb disagreement, ill-formed verbs, pronoun errors, possessive errors, extra, wrong or missing word) 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome8. Writing Style and Word Usage 10 pts The writing was clear, coherent, and concise. The writing was clearly organized, and easy to read. Opinion was only provided when appropriate. The thoughts were organized and developed in a logical sequence. There were no mistakes in writing style and word usage (repetition of words, inappropriate words/phrases, too many short sentences, imprecise vocabulary, non-professional vocabulary, missing introduction, missing conclusion) 9.1 pts GOOD 8.2 pts The writing was vague and not clearly organized. The thoughts were not developed in a logical sequence. Opinion was provided in a multiple areas of the paper. There were several (3-4) mistakes in writing style and word usage (repetition of words, inappropriate words/phrases, too many short sentences, imprecise vocabulary, non-professional vocabulary, missing introduction, missing conclusion) 7.3 pts MARGINAL 6.4 pts The writing was unclear, incoherent, and not concise. The writing was unorganized, and difficult to read. Opinion was provided throughout the paper. The thoughts were disorganized and not developed in a logical sequence. There were significant (more than 8) mistakes in writing style and word usage (repetition of words, inappropriate words/phrases, too many short sentences, imprecise vocabulary, non-professional vocabulary, missing introduction, missing conclusion) 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome9. Mechanics 10 pts No mechanics errors 9.1 pts GOOD 8.2 pts Several mechanics errors (3-4) (spelling, capitalization, punctuation, fused words, compound words, duplicates, abbreviations) 7.3 pts MARGINAL 6.4 pts There were significant mechanics (more than 8) mistakes (spelling, capitalization, punctuation, fused words, compound words, duplicates, abbreviations) 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome10. APA Format 10 pts APA formatting (e.g., font style, font size, appropriate margins, the first sentence of a paragraph should be indented, double spacing, etc...) was used correctly. 9.1 pts GOOD 8.2 pts There were no more than 3 errors in APA formatting (e.g., font style, font size, appropriate margins, the first sentence of a paragraph should be indented, double spacing, etc...). 7.3 pts MARGINAL 6.4 pts There were 4 or more errors in APA formatting (e.g., font style, font size, appropriate margins, the first sentence of a paragraph should be indented, double spacing, etc...). 10 pts Total Points: 100