Democratic Decline in Philippines
Choose a single country and period from the list of possible cases of democratic decline between 1900 and 2019 (see below). In a 4-5 page essay, provide an analysis of the causes of democratic decline in that case.
Your essay should include the following sections:
- Democratic roots (1 page) (20% of grade)
- How long has the country been a democracy? In the years before the country began backsliding, how would you describe the state of the democracy?
- NB: The V-Dem Country Graph feature can help you visualize the quality of democracy over time. The V-Dem Codebook includes descriptions of democracy indices including the “Liberal Democracy Index” and the “Electoral Democracy Index”. You can plot these and their subcomponents in the Country Graph tool to get an initial sense of how the quality of democracy is changing over time in your case. You are not required to include this plot in your paper.
- Symptoms of erosion (1 page) (20% of grade)
- When did the country start to backslide? For how many years was democracy on the decline?
- What does backsliding look like in your country? Lecture 17 on patterns of democratic decline may be particularly useful here.
- Explaining the decline (2-3 pages) (40% of grade)
- What are the one or two main factors that seem to drive the decline in democratic quality in your country? This can be a structural feature, like ethnic tensions or economic inequality, or an institutional factor, like a particular electoral system or type of executive, or something else.
- Be sure to connect the problems that you discuss to the erosion of democracy, and do not just list problems in the case. How did those factors lead to a decline in the quality of democracy? Exemplary papers will discuss whether patterns in the case are consistent with the argument that the factor(s) that you identify have led to democratic decline. These patterns could be related to which citizens support an anti-democratic party, or when changes in the social, economic, or institutional features occurred relative to democratic decline, among other things.
- If the factor(s) that you identify as contributing to decline in your case are discussed in some of the theories of democratic decline covered in Lectures 17-24, be sure to cite and briefly describe the theory in your discussion of the case.
The other 20% of your grade is for the general quality and clarity of your essay (logically structured, no obvious factual errors, proper cited, clearly written, etc).
Your essay should make an argument about the cause(s) of democratic decline in your case. Your essay should be well-organized, clear, and easy to read. It must include citations in MLA format from applicable course readings as well as sources specific to your country. The essay should be no more than five pages (not including the Works Cited page) and typed in Times New Roman 12 point font. The margins should be one inch on all sides, and it should be double-spaced.
Sources
To get full credit on the paper, you must use at least two academic sources from outside the course readings. Academic sources go through the peer review process where other qualified scholars thoroughly judge the research before it is published. Google Scholar ) is a great way to find academic sources.
Suggested academic sources:
- Journal of Democracy – covers whole world
- Area studies journals (e.g. African Affairs , Latin American Politics and Society)
Secondary sources:
- Economist Intelligence Reports )
- Freedom House reports )(both Freedom in the World reports and Freedom of Press reports)
- State Department Human Rights Reports )
- Human Rights Watch reports )
- International Crisis Group reports )
- Africa Confidential。
- Reports from local civil society organizations
- Newspapers and magazines (New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Economist, New Yorker, etc)
Databases on quality of democracy:
Varieties of Democracy (链接到外部网站。)
Polity IV (链接到外部网站。)
Economist Democracy Index (链接到外部网站。)
NB: Internet sources that do not have quality-control systems (ex. blogs, websites with unclear authorship) can be helpful starting points but shouldn’t be cited as academic sources.
List of Possible Cases
The following list includes countries between 1900 and 2019 that 1) started at a minimal level of electoral democracy and then 2) experienced a drop in their liberal democracy score according to the V-Dem data.[1]
Pick one case (country and period) from this list to analyze in your paper.
NOTE: It may be more difficult to find information on very early cases, or cases with relatively small declines in the quality of democracy. Please keep this in mind when choosing your case. If you have relatively little research experience, we recommend choosing a case from the 1990s-2010s.
Country |
Period |
Argentina |
1930s |
Argentina |
1960s |
Argentina |
1970s |
Armenia |
1990s |
Austria |
1930s |
Belarus |
1990s / early 2000s |
Belgium |
1910s |
Belgium |
1940s |
Benin |
2010s |
Brazil |
2010s |
Bulgaria |
2010s |
Burkina Faso |
2010s |
Chile |
1970s |
Comoros |
2010s |
Croatia |
2010s |
Czech Republic |
1930s / 1940s |
Denmark |
1940s |
Ecuador |
2000s (late) / 2010s |
Estonia |
1930s |
Fiji |
1980s (late) / 1990s |
Fiji |
2000s |
France |
1940s |
Germany |
1930s |
Ghana |
1980s |
Hungary |
2010s |
India |
1970s |
India |
2010s |
Indonesia |
1950s (late) / 1960s |
Latvia |
1930s |
Libya |
2010s |
Lithuania |
1920s |
Luxembourg |
1940s |
Madagascar |
2000s (late) / 2010s |
Maldives |
2010s |
Mali |
2010s |
Malta |
1950s (late) / 1960s |
Moldova |
2000s |
Moldova |
2010s |
Nepal |
2010s |
Netherlands |
1940s |
Nicaragua |
2000s (late) / 2010s |
North Macedonia |
2010s |
Niger |
1990s |
Norway |
1940s |
Palestine / West Bank |
2000s (late) / 2010s |
Peru |
1990s |
Philippines |
2010s |
Poland |
1920s |
Poland |
2010s |
Romania |
2010s |
Serbia |
2013 |
Solomon Islands |
2000s |
South Korea |
2000s (late) / 2010s |
Spain |
1930s (late) / 1940s |
Sri Lanka |
1970s (late) / 1980s |
Suriname |
1980s |
Thailand |
2000s |
Thailand |
2010s |
Turkey |
1970s |
Turkey |
1980s |
Turkey |
2010s |
Ukraine |
1990s (late) / 2000s |
Ukraine |
2010s |
Uruguay |
1930s |
Uruguay |
1960s (late) / 1970s |
Zambia |
2010s |
[1] A few cases have been dropped because the decline in the liberal democracy score was very small and short-lived. Venezuela and the US have also been dropped because we will analyze them in other activities.
Democratic Decline in Philippine
Name
Institution
Due Date
Democratic Decline in Philippine
The Republic of the Philippines gained formal recognition of independence from the American colonization on 4th July 1946. The declaration led to a period of self-actualization in the political system and leadership. According to Punongbayan, the county wanted to inaugurate the United States' form of government in leadership and the implementation of democracy. The implementation could be achieved through the following aspects, such as the form of the government, representation of leadership dimensions, and the voting process. Philippine intended to instate democracy with a system of separation of power (executive, legislative and judicial) and checking to ensure balance in the setting like in the United States' case of formation (Punongbayan). However, the election of the Philippine Senate on a nationwide basis differed from the provincial election plan in the United States. Although the citizens had the right to vote, the provinces in the Philippine congress had weak voices.
However, the difference could not be exaggerated to minimize democracy in the country since the Philippines have the freedom to "government of the people, by the people and for the people" through the mere act of participating in the voting exercise for the leaders they would wish to see in power. The state of democracy in the country reveals a better period for the citizens compared to the time after erosion (Punongbayan). Although the system had vital issues such as the voting system, the state had a democratic setting and not the control in the non-democratic situation. However, the level of democracy in the country was weak since the community did not have most members representing them in the government (Punongbayan). This aspect detriment but does not entirely eradicate the fact that the Philippines once experienced democracy and lived in their choice of the leaders they wanted through voting.
The Philippines started facing democratic erosion in 2016, after the election of Rodrigo Duterte. The people did not realize the decline signs immediately as the Duterte implemented his political experience to stage power and control without the knowledge of the citizens. They might have opposed his plan if they had known the intentions before actual institution and defilement of the freedom they had attained after the end of colonization. However, Duterte had a profound knowledge of politics from his father's experience as a provincial governor (Jake). In addition, the president had also worked as a lawyer and state prosecutor before his first election as the mayor of Davao. Duterte had profound intelligence on how he could twist the political system in his favor, without recognition. However, his leadership as mayor impacted Davao positively in various ways. According to Jake, he eradicated corruption and combated crime and militancy, making the state one of the places in the country.
The change instituted by Duterte in Davao yielded his presidential elections winning with the citizens not knowing the elections had instated a long journey towards the decline and eradication of democracy in their country. The record proved that Duterte was the perfect leader to win the fight against drugs in the country (Jake). However, people did not realize and consider how the battle might impact their country and their freedom in the exercise of democracy. The processes hurt the republic in the Philippine significantly, and the citizens could not counteract his action since he was the leader holding power and control in the country. Duterte began his war on drugs immediately after he took up office as the president. However, the fight involved conspicuous actions of killing the drug dealers and users in the country. Could the leader not identify other ways of apprehending the offenders? According to Jake, more than three thousand people died since the election of Duterte as a president in the name of fighting drug dealing in the country, with the murders hired by the president and other governmental leaders. The assassinations indulged extra-judicial killings instituted and protected from interference by the government (Jake). The judicial and government killings revealed symptoms of democratic erosion. Duterte had alrea...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
Icíar Bollaín’s Even the Rain Social Sciences Essay
3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
-
Sociology in Gender Inequalities
4 pages/≈1100 words | No Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
-
The Three Group Decision-Making Processes Essential to Companies
4 pages/≈1100 words | No Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |