Essay Available:
Pages:
8 pages/≈2200 words
Sources:
2
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 34.56
Topic:
Planning study analysis assignment
Essay Instructions:
The purpose of this assignment is to enable you to explore a planning issue by examining a planning
study and application in-depth. You are the planner responsible for assessing the merits of a
development application (see below for list). As the planner, would you recommend that City Council
approve the application? Why or why not? You must evaluate the development application through the
lens of the equity planning approach and assess whether it conforms to the Golden Mile Secondary Plan.
Specifically, based on your interests (e.g., housing, parks, heritage, built form, mobility, community
services and facilities, etc.), determine whether the development application aligns with the relevant
principles outlined in the Golden Mile Secondary plan.
Select one of the development applications listed below, review all relevant supporting documentation,
and assess the application through the lens of the equity planning approach. The analysis should address
all of the questions posed below and include the following components (Be sure to take note of the word
count distribution below):
1. Introduction and Background Analysis: Briefly introduce the selected development application
and address the following questions:
a. What are the current conditions on the subject lands? In other words, use Google
Streetview to take screenshots of what is currently existing on the parcel of land. What is
proposed to be developed on that site? What is the site’s current zoning? What are
proposed zoning changes? Outline the Golden Mile Secondary Plan
(https://www(dot)toronto(dot)ca/city-government/planning-development/planning-studies-
initiatives/golden-mile-secondary-plan-study/) and highlight the specific guidelines
related to your interest (e.g., housing, parks, heritage, built form, mobility, community
services and facilities, etc.). (Approx. word count: 300 words)
2. Critical Analysis: In evaluating the development application and Secondary Plan through the
equity planning lens, what needs might be missing, obscured, neglected or barely addressed?
Who benefits? How does this affect vulnerable and disadvantaged residents? Does the plan
prioritize the needs of some groups over others? Does this plan meet the goals of equity
planning? Explain why or why not. You should also assess the public consultation strategy
through the lens of Arnstein’s (2019) conception of the citizen participation ladder. How was the
public consultation designed and how effective do you think it will be/or was in terms of
promoting citizen empowerment? In responding to these questions, be sure to support your
points with evidence from Arnstein’s (2019) and Sandercock’s (1998) readings. You should also
analyze the selected development application through the lens of one of the following issues
discussed in the course: transportation equity, ableism, decolonization, gentrification, anti-
displacement, and/or equitable development. (Approx. word count: 1500 words)
3. Conclusion – Possible urban futures and recommendation: As the planner in charge of this
application, what would you recommend to City Council? Would you recommend that the application be approved? Why or why not. How might the development application and/or
Secondary Plan be redesigned or adjusted to be more equitable? (Approx. word count: 200-300
words)
List of Development Applications:
1. 860 PHARMACY AVE, 9-23 AND 32-40 CRAIGTON DR, AND 1 RANNOCK ST:
https://www(dot)toronto(dot)ca/city-government/planning-development/application-
details/?id=5299320&pid=14482&title=860%20PHARMACY%20AVE
2. 1910 EGLINTON AVE E (Note: Decision already made but you should make your own
recommendation): https://www(dot)toronto(dot)ca/city-government/planning-
development/application-details/?id=4774660&pid=14485&title=1910-EGLINTON-AVE-E
Grading Criteria:
Specific criteria are: (1) Accuracy and quality of background analysis; (2) Quality of the assessment and
analysis related to equity planning (e.g., is it clearly and well-supported by evidence from the readings?);
(3) Quality of engagement with the questions and assignment requirements; (4) Quality of the writing
and use of proper citations (e.g., is the assignment well-written and well-structured?).
Format:
• Use 1-inch margins, 12-point font, and double-spacing.
• Include your name, student number, and date on the cover page.
• Use APA-style for in-text citations and reference lists. For APA formatting help:
https://owl(dot)purdue(dot)edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_style_introduction.html
Tips:
• Be sure to structure your assignment in essay format.
• Using titled subsections may help you to organize this paper.
• Be specific and be sure to directly engage with the questions. Avoid vague and general
statements and language.
• Clearly connect specific evidence from the readings, lectures, study and other reports to support
your points.
• Properly cite your ideas.
Essay Sample Content Preview:
Equitable Urban Development: A Critical Analysis of the 1910 Eglinton Ave E Project through the Lens of the Golden Mile Secondary Plan
Student Name
Institution
Professor Name
Course
Date
Equitable Urban Development: A Critical Analysis of the 1910 Eglinton Ave E Project through the Lens of the Golden Mile Secondary Plan
This paper considers the development application for 1910 Eglinton Ave E, primarily how it responds to the urban planning principles and the equity issues raised by the Golden Mile Secondary Plan context. The relevance of the application is attributed to its influence on the local development patterns, community service, and overall urban fabric, hence the need for justice in planning decisions (Sandercock, 1998). The Google Street View of the present location at 1910 Eglinton Ave E shows the modern commercial buildings in an entirely urban environment. Commercial, service, and residential units are found in this mixed-use zoning district. The envisaged project suggests converting the site into a mixed-use facility comprising housing, retail, and public amenities. This transition requires zoning adjustments to cater to the growing density, elevation, and range of land uses, conforming to more sweeping urban renewal goals.
The Golden Mile Secondary Plan, a context plan for the area, focuses on sustainability, community value, and improved public realms. The critical aspects of this study include mixed-use development promotion for creating live communities, public and green spaces expansion for liveable environments, and movement improvement through pedestrian-oriented design and improved transit links (Arnstein, 2019). Such rules are designed to ensure that the development will positively affect the area’s social, economic, and environmental character from an equity-focused urban development perspective. Reviewing the proposed development on 1910 Eglinton Ave E about the Golden Mile Secondary Plan standards will indicate a tremendous urban fairness potential. The proposal for a mixed-use development approach aligns with the objectives of the plan to develop urban spaces that are linked and animated, and that would be suitable for a diverse range of communities.
Figure 1: Google Street View of the present location at 1910 Eglinton Ave E
right247144700right000Source: google map view
Critical Analysis
Equity planning is crucial in urban development to meet the demands of such residents. A 1910 Eglinton Ave E development application is examined for equity planning and Golden Mile Secondary Plan compliance. It is done by studying the parties that will be advantaged by the intended kind of development and those that will stand to lose. The public consultation strategy is evaluated through Arnstein’s (2019) citizen participation ladder. A section on transportation equity is also added to evaluate the particular effects of the development application.
Equity Planning Lens Application
The main concern of equity planning is creating equitable communities whereby all residents, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, have access to resources, services, and opportunities. It emphasizes equity in resource distribution and participatory planning. This approach concerns the results that may satisfy everybody in society, including those often left out in traditional planning (Gaber, 2019). Equity planning involves examining how the 1910 Eglinton Ave E project meets principles of equitable benefits to all community members, especially the most vulnerable or disadvantaged. This evaluation considers the project’s focus on inclusiveness and the fair distribution of its benefits among different segments of society. Equity planning is designed to reallocate resources, access to opportunities, and services to those who need them the most, inclusive involvement in planning processes, and results in solving social inequities. The proposed development at 1910 Eglinton Ave E could benefit the local neighborhood by providing more homes and diversified space uses with mixed-use structures (Sandercock, 1998). Nevertheless, the effect on different classes, mainly the disadvantaged groups, is determined by several variables such as affordability, accessibility, and comprehensiveness of facilities and services.
Newcomers who have the opportunity to live in modern housing and a lively community space anticipate being the beneficiaries of the development. The development will introduce increased foot traffic and the economic vitality that the local businesses may exploit (Pendall, 2000). However, the condition of its existing residents who suffer increased rent and living costs could lead to a replacement of lower-income families and individuals. The gentrification phenomenon that usually follows urban renewal projects could weaken communities. For the development to fully conform to equity planning principles, measures must be included to minimize these risks (Fischler, 2012). To promote fairness and equality, the project pledges to allocate a substantial proportion of affordable homes and guarantee that amenities and facilities are readily available to persons of all price brackets. Furthermore, this approach actively engages community people in planning to address and integrate their distinct needs and concerns directly.
Public Consultation Strategy Analysis
The 1910 Eglinton Ave East development public consultation process assessment using Arnstein’s Ladder of Citizen Participation concentrates on measuring citizen empowerment beyond merely imparting information. Arnstein’s typology defines eight levels of citizen participation, from non-participation through several forms of tokenism to citizen control (Arnstein, 2019). This model is a roadmap to the transition from engagement to real empowerment in decision-making processes.
In a genuinely enabling public consultation process, an individual would be looking for strategies that partner the citizens with the government and allow them to produce ideas that would be factored into the final decisions. This would fall under the higher levels of Arnstein’s ladder, namely “partnershi...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now: