100% (1)
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
3
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:

Ethics in Science Communication Paper

Essay Instructions:
Write a 1,250-word essay addressing the following issue: Discuss scientific communication from an ethical perspective and how the scientific community attempts to monitor the information that is communicated. Reference at least three journal resources, Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Essay Sample Content Preview:
ETHICS IN SCIENCE COMMUNICATION PAPER Insert Name Course Grade Instructor’s Name Date The application of appropriate skills, activities and dialog in producing personal responses to science is known as science communication. The science communication is built in response to the demand of professionals work to enhance a network to share ideas regarding science. There is a need for science ideas to be communicated effectively, because this enhances scientists to transgress from research and acknowledges their findings in the wider spectrum. The scientific findings are judged with respect on how they are effectively communicated and shared and its viability to humanity. The audience of a scientific finding has an experience that is pleasing and satisfying, and this is enabled by science communicators’ ability to impart knowledge gently and skillfully. Scientific communications should be founded on an ethical practical code which promotes moral and ideas that avoid pious attitudes and unenforceable creed. The ethical norms are learned at early age in social settings, but moral development is attained throughout the human life. The morals are attained at different phases of growth and maturity and it is possible for the ethical norms to be regarded as common sense (Mullahy, 2004). Although ethical norms are recognized by everyone, their interpretation, application and balancing of these norms are different in light of own values and experiences in life. Ethical norms are broader than laws and this makes societies to have rules which govern behavior. The moral standards, ethical and legal rules apply same concepts though they are not the same. This is because an action may be considered to be legal but unethical or so illegal but is considered ethical (Benos, et al., 2005). The ethical concepts and principles are employed to evaluate laws which are regarded as immoral and unjust. Ethics therefore, focus on the discipline standard of conduct which defines the procedure of analyzing complex problems. The norms for behavior are well suited with the aims and objectives of a research project, since they help the member to coordinate actions that establish public trust to the discipline (Benos, et al., 2005). Scientific research projects take time and funds for its execution and analysis. Therefore, the process should be conducted and reported in an honest, objective and fair manner. There are some ideal deviations which result from ethical breaches arising out of ignorance, yet in legal parlance, ignorance is and can not be an excuse (Benos, et al., 2005). Incumbents have to recognize the ethical requirements in conducting and communication of scientific findings, as deviating from ethical guidelines manifests itself in the public domain. It is thus import ant to adhere to the ethical norms with respect to research project. Adhering to the ethical norms enhance the promotion of the research project objectives like knowledge, truth and avoidance of errors. By adhering to the ethical codes it is possible to eliminate fabrication and falsifying of the research data promoting trust (Mullahy, 2004). This is because a greater number of people are involved from different disciplines promoting values essential for a collaborative project. Trust, accountability and fairness are the ethical norms which guide the copyrights and sharing of data policies and rules of confidentiality in peer review. This protects the interest of intellectuals by encouraging collaboration. For the research specialist to receive credit regarding their contribution, the ethical norms enhance researchers to be accountable to the public (Benos, et al., 2005). The scientific communication ensures that the public policies with respect to research misconduct use necessary order to ensure that the public is satisfied with the findings, as this helps researchers to acquire public support (Benos, et al., 2005). Important moral and social values are promoted by research projects that are fundamentally based on social responsibility and comply with the legal rules, because any lapses can significantly harm the subject matter of the research. The scientific findings have to be review before their transmission to the media and messaging in the public initiative engagement as it enhances the review of challenges to the model deficit. This is because there are rules that lay the public to utilize the scientific advice and expertise. The public has the likelihood of employing criteria to reach judgment such as how...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!