Asian Americans Written Assignment

In “Key Facts About Asian Americans, a Diverse and Growing Population” (López, Ruiz & Patten, 2017), the authors note that Asian migration to the United States increased by 72% from 2000 to 2015, which is “the fastest growth rate of any major racial or ethnic group” (López et al., 2017, para. 4). Yet, Asian Americans are still perceived as a model minority, and the animus directed towards other immigrant groups does not seem to be leveled at Asian immigrants. Read López et al. (2017) and apply concepts from the text to explain why Asian immigration is not as feared as immigrants from other parts of the world. What characteristics described in the article might be responsible for the muted reaction? Your paper should be a 2-3 page critical application of theoretical concepts from the text (and any other academic sources you wish to include) to the statistical and descriptive information provided by López et al. (2017). The attributes you select and the analysis you provide will likely depend on the theoretical perspective to which you feel mostly aligned, Functionalism, Conflict Theory, or Symbolic Interactionism. Resource: Key facts about Asian Americans, a diverse and growing populationLinks to an external site.. Rubric SOC 304 Week 5 Asian Americans Paper Rubric SOC 304 Week 5 Asian Americans Paper Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1. Selection of Attributes: Identifying possible reasons for the perception of Asian migrants 20 to >18.0 pts EXEMPLARY Student identifies three or more highly plausible attributes described López et al. (2017) which likely explain why Asian immigrants have not been a target of anti-immigrant ire. 18 to >16.0 pts GOOD 16 to >14.0 pts SATISFACTORY Student identifies one or two plausible attributes described López et al. (2017) which could explain why Asian immigrants have not been demonized. 14 to >13.0 pts MARGINAL 13 to >0 pts UNSATISFACTORY Student selects attributes that are not likely to be causal factors, such as identifying stereotypes instead of attributes described in López et al. (2017). 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2. Analysis: The application of theory and logic to explain how/why the attributes identified have muted anti-immigration biases 20 to >18.0 pts Student offers an insightful explanation of the causality of Asian immigrant attributes to explain why anti-immigrant prejudice and discrimination have not increased for these immigrants. 18 to >16.0 pts GOOD 16 to >14.0 pts Student satisfactory applies theory and/or logic to provide a reasonable cause/effect relationship. 14 to >13.0 pts MARGINAL 13 to >0 pts Insufficient application of theory and/or logic to suggest a potential causal relationship between attributes and perception 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3. Strength of writing: Paper structure and writing ability 20 to >18.0 pts Student presents ideas in logical order, thoroughly explains difficult concepts, and demonstrates strong academic writing skills. 18 to >16.0 pts GOOD 16 to >14.0 pts Student’s ideas are mostly presented in logical sequence. The student demonstrates appropriate academic writing skills. 14 to >13.0 pts MARGINAL 13 to >0 pts Student’s ideas are haphazardly presented or inadequately developed. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome4. Quality of the writing: Spelling, Grammar, and overall MUGS errors 20 to >18.0 pts NO MUGS errors! 18 to >16.0 pts GOOD 16 to >14.0 pts No more than 2-3 MUGS errors. 14 to >13.0 pts MARGINAL 13 to >0 pts More than 4 MUGS errors. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5. APA Formatting: Commenting thoughtfully on the posts of peers 20 to >18.0 pts Virtually no APA errors, beyond a stray comma or two. 18 to >16.0 pts GOOD 16 to >14.0 pts Between 1 and 3 minor APA errors 14 to >13.0 pts MARGINAL 13 to >0 pts Multiple minor APA errors and/or missing required content. 20 pts Total Points: 100