The Application of Distributive Justice

The Application of Distributive Justice
Author's Name
The Institutional Affiliation
Course Number and Name
Instructor Name
Assignment Due Date
The Application of Distributive Justice
Distributive justice is a concept that concerns the fair dispensation of assets, advantages, and burdens in society. This principle aims to ensure that individuals receive an appropriate part of the benefits and hindrances of living in society. Justice is a fundamental concept that underpins our understanding of what is right and wrong in a community (Julias, 2006). The world order conspires with the dispensations of assets and authority between countries, and distributive justice is crucial in claiming this parity. In many cases, the world order is comprised of a significant disparity of ratios in wealth and authority, with a small number of states and individuals occupying a disproportionate ratio of resources and influence. This can lead to social and economic injustices, contributing to conflict, instability, and other problems. Equality is one of the prime ingredients of distributive parity. (Saniovanni, 2007). It comprises aspects and views that amalgamate equality, freedom, and social compliance principles. A society with the fair materialization of social parity indeed results in a prosperous nation regardless of the color, creed, and gender of its people.
Coercion is another significant factor in distributive justice (Pevnick, 2007). Coercion refers to the use of force or the threat of force to compel individuals to act in a certain way or to accept a particular outcome. This can undermine distributive justice, preventing individuals from receiving a fair share of resources and opportunities (Blake, 2019). This essay will discuss the issue of non-equality between states because of the usage of coercion. Also, an analysis of judicial delays and elongation has been highlighted in this essay. Social justice is a concept that is closely related to distributive justice, and distributive justice, coupled with ease of coercion, further aggravates social parity issues in the world. The issue of the absence of distributive justice and inequality will be discussed in this essay. It concerns the fair treatment of individuals and groups within society and the dispensation of assets and opportunities.
The theme of the article "Justice, Authority, and the World Order" by A. Walton, published in the Journal of Global Ethics in 2009, is the relationship between parity, power, and international alignment. In particular, the article examines the idea that justice requires a legitimate authority and that the current world order lacks such authority (Blake, 2019). In the article, Walton states that the current world order lacks legitimate power, which undermines the possibility of acquiring parity (Walton, 2009). He argues that there is a need for a global leader to establish and enforce rules and norms based on principles of justice.
The author's central message is that justice requires a legitimate authority, and the current world order lacks such authority (Julias, 2006). He argues that a global authority based on principles of democratic legitimacy and accountability is necessary to promote the common good and ensure that the distribution of resources and benefits is fair and equitable (Blake, 2001). The article contributes to the ongoing debate about the relationship between justice, authority, and the global order. It highlights the need for greater attention to this issue in international politics and policymaking.
Walton argues that justice is a fundamental value necessary for the functioning of any society, whether at the local, national, or global level. Distributive justice, in particular, concerns the fair distribution of resources and benefits within a society and is a critical component of social justice (Pevnick, 2007). While distributive justice is often discussed in the nation-state context, Walton argues it is equally applicable globally. He notes that a lack of legitimate authority characterizes the current global order, leading to powerful states and actors acting with impunity, often at the expense of weaker states and individuals (Cohen & Sabel, 2006). This has resulted in a highly unequal distribution of resources and benefits in the world, and many individuals and groups are excluded from the benefits of globalization.
To address this problem, Walton argues that there is a need for a global authority to establish and enforce rules and norms based on principles of justice. Such an authority would promote the common good and ensure that the distribution of resources and benefits is fair and equitable (Julias, 2006). Walton's argument suggests that distributive justice is not limited to the state system but applies equally to the global level (Walton, 2009). He notes that the worldwide order lacks a legitimate authority that can ensure distributive justice and undermines the possibility of achieving justice at the global level. Therefore, an international regime that can establish and enforce rules and norms based on principles of justice is necessary to promote distributive justice worldwide (Saniovanni, 2007). However, some critics of global distributive justice argue that justice is only possible within the context of the state system and that attempts to promote justice at the global level are misguided.
While this argument has some merit, Walton's article provides a compelling counterpoint. He argues that a lack of legitimate authority already characterizes the current global order and that striving to enthrall distributive justice at the global level is necessary to address this problem (Pevnick, 2007). Moreover, he suggests that a worldwide authority based on principles of democratic legitimacy and accountability could promote the interests of all individuals and groups and would be able to hold powerful actors accountable for their actions.
After reading A. Walton's article "Justice, Authority, and the World Order," I reflected on the importance of distributive justice at the global level and the need for a legitimate global authority to ensure its implementation. Walton's argument that distributive justice applies equally to the global level as it does to the nation-state is particularly compelling (Walton, 2009). The present international order contains factors like an absence of legal power, which has led to the established nations and actors capturing and devastating meagre states and individuals. This has resulted in an unequal distribution of resources and benefits, with many individuals and groups being excluded from the benefits of globalization (Pevnick, 2007). Therefore, it is necessary to establish a global authority that can install and enforce rules and norms based on principles of justice. Walton argues that justice is a fundamental value necessary for the functioning of any society, whether at the local, national, or global level. Distributive justice, in particular, concerns the fair distribution of resources and benefits within a society and is a critical component of social justice.
However, I also recognize that there are challenges to promoting distributive justice at the global level, particularly in the context of the sovereignty of individual states (Thomas, 2005). I believe that the lack of a legitimate global authority means that promoting distributive justice at the global level is necessary, even if it means infringing on the sovereignty of individual states. I think Walton has done an excellent job covering the concept's essential aspects. He emphasizes the importance of fairness and equality in the distribution of resources and benefits and how this is necessary for the functioning of any society.
Overall, I found Walton's article to be well-written and thought-provoking. It provides a compelling argument for why distributive justice is necessary globally and why a legitimate global authority must ensure its implementation (Cohen &...