Essay Available:
Pages:
1 pages/≈275 words
Sources:
2
Style:
APA
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 4.32
Topic:
U-5 diss ABA
Essay Instructions:
Welcome to our unit five discussion board. This week you read about group contingencies and token economies. In order for your group contingencies and token economies to work, you need to use effective reinforcers. How do you find effective reinforcers? Well, you start with a preference assessment to find out what your client likes and doesn't like, then you test out these preferences using a reinforcer assessment. These are our topics for this lecture. There are a variety of ways that you can determine your client's preferences. The first and easiest way is to simply ask the person. Not only is this the easiest way to determine preferences, but it is the quickest way to, you could ask your client open ended questions like, what do you like to do for fun? Or what is your favorite food? Asking your client to self report preferences requires that your client have the verbal skills to do so. If your client does not have the verbal skills to self report on preferences, you could ask the client significant others such as parents or teachers. One of my favorite ways to get an idea of a client's preferences is to just hang out and watch what the client chooses to do with his or her free time. The activities that a person freely chooses to engage in will often be effective reinforcers and behavior plans. You can do this in a contrived way, where you set up the environment with a predetermined set of activities and materials. Or you can do it in a natural way, where you observe the client in his or her everyday environment. In a trial based method of assessing stimulus preference, various stimuli are presented to the client in a series of trials. The client's response to each stimulus is measured. When you are measuring the client's response, you are looking for approach contact and engagement with the item. Approach would be defined as looking at the item or reaching for the item. Contact would be defined as touching the item. Engagement would be defined as actually interacting with the stimulus, playing with it, eating it. If it's a food item, the item or items that are approached, contacted, or engaged with during the highest number of trials are assumed to be the most preferred item or items. There are several different ways you can present items in the trial based stimulus preference assessments. In the single stimulus presentation method, only one item is presented at a time. If a client has difficulty selecting among an array of items, the single stimulus presentation is probably best in the paired stimuli presentation method. Each trial consists of two items presented together. The client is required to choose among the two throughout the assessment. Each stimulus is matched randomly with all of the other stimuli in the set, so that each stimulus gets paired with every other stimulus at least once. At the end of the assessment, the stimuli are rank order from high preference, the item chosen the most number of times to lowest preference, the item chosen the least number of times are not chosen at all. Multiple stimuli preference assessments are very similar to paired stimuli preference assessments. The main difference is that an array of three or more stimuli are presented together instead of just two. There are two variations of the multiple stimuli preference assessment. Multiple stimuli preference assessment with replacement and multiple stimuli Preference assessment without replacement, and a multiple stimuli with replacement preference assessment. After the client chooses an item from the array, that item is replaced with another item. For example, in an array of six items, the client is always choosing from six items in a multiple stimuli without replacement preference assessment, after the client chooses an item from the array, that item is not replaced. Continue with our example in an array of six items after the first trial, in which the client chooses an item, then the array goes down to five items. After the second trial in which another item is chosen, then the array goes down to four items and so on. Just because an item or activity is preferred does not mean that a client will work to access it. The only way to know for sure that an item or an activity will function as a reinforcer is to present the item or activity immediately following a behavior and see if that behavior increases in the future. You want to find out if that item functions as a positive reinforcer. In real life, your reading describes a variety of reinforcement schedules to test the effectiveness of an item or activity to act as a reinforcer. The main takeaway from this is that you want to make sure a client will work for an item or activity before plugging it into a behavior plan. You cannot just assume that because the item is preferred, the client will engage in a new behavior to get access to it. Thank you for listening to the Unit Five discussion board lecture.
Read the following scenario.
You are working on developing a token economy for a 4-year-old girl. You need to come up with a list of possible backup reinforcers to use. You already have a list of activities to use as reinforcers but you want some ideas for inexpensive items to use.
Develop a list of 10 items to be used in a stimulus preference assessment.
Describe the paired stimulus preference assessment and how to implement a paired stimulus preference assessment using the items you identified. How will you know which items are preferred?
Describe the two types of multiple stimulus preference assessments. Select one type to use and provide your rationale for your choice. Describe how you would implement this assessment using the items you selected. How will you know which items are preferred?
Why are the results of a stimulus preference assessment not necessarily guaranteed reinforcers?
READING AND RESOURCES
Read Chapter 11 in Applied Behavior Analysis: “Positive Reinforcement” pp. 268-280 on Identifying Potential Reinforcers
Read Chapter 28 in Applied Behavior Analysis: “Token Economy, Group Contingencies, and Contingency Contracting"
Essay Sample Content Preview:
U-5 diss ABA
Student’s Name
Institution
Course Code: Course Name
Professor’s Name
Submission Date
In developing a token economy for a 4-year-old, the first thing I would do is identify inexpensive items appropriate for a stimulus preference assessment. Such items are stickers, small toy cars, crayons, animal figurines, temporary tattoos, colorful erasers, bubbles, small puzzles, rubber bracelets, and scented markers. These materials would be interesting yet affordable, thus becoming perfect candidates for reinforcement.
I would then use a paired stimulus preference assessment to determine which items the child prefers. Items are presented two at a time, and the child is asked to choose one. The items are paired such that in this method, each item is matched with every other item across trials, thus giving a complete picture of the child's preference. I can identify the most appealing items by tracking which are chosen most often. For example, if the child consistently...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now: