Current Events in Counter Terrorism

Current Events in Counter Terrorism Report
Student’s Name
Department, University
Course Code: Course Name
Professor’s Name
Due Date
Abstract
The rising incidence of terrorist attacks has demanded that everyone direct their efforts toward addressing the issue. The progress has helped the establishment of counterterrorism interventions aimed at countering terrorist attacks and deterring illegal actions associated with them. Counterterrorism consists of techniques, military plans, and tactics used by the state to thwart terrorist acts. Counterterrorism comprises the actions or strategies used by intelligence agencies to combat terrorism or avert potential threats. The national government has created counterterrorism policies in partnership with other statewide governments to address the worldwide challenge. Approaches to address terrorism activities demand international cooperation. These efforts should be informed by a unified approach anchored on creating open communication across individual states inclined to report terrorist concerns for quick action. For achieving world political stability, efficient coordination in deploying contemporary counterterrorism developments is crucial.
Current Events in Counter Terrorism Report
Introduction
The Texas government permits concealed carriage of guns in colleges and universities and allows local school systems to authorize employees to carry weapons. This enables individuals to protect themselves while on the college or university premises. Several Texans believe that the legislature’s policies make it too easy for those with mental illnesses to obtain and carry weapons. Therefore, Texas should enact stricter gun control policies to prevent future massacres. This report discusses a recent terrorist occurrence, detailing the counterterrorism operation, global counterterrorism efforts, and how such efforts impact the prevalence of related terrorist activities.
Article Summary
The chosen article ‘After Uvalde, Texas State Police Revise Training for Mass Shootings’ by J. David Goodman for New York Times provides further information on anti-terrorism measures in Texas. The article describes the shooting incident at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, on May 24, 2022, in which two adults and nineteen children were slain. What started as a rite of passage into maturity ended tragically when a suspect fired an AR-15-style firearm he acquired days after turning 18. Salvador Ramos, a student at Uvalde High School who is believed to be mentally ill, reportedly obtained two assault weapons days following his eighteenth birthday and used one to commit a school shooting eight days later. Ramos was notorious for beating and intimidating his classmates. According to colleagues, he showed strange conduct, such as intimidating students and stating to have carved scars on his face.
As a result of the massacre, the Department of Public Safety (DPS) of Texas implemented a far more active strategy for dealing with school mass shootings. After conducting an internal review of the acts and inactions of Texas’ law enforcement officers at the elementary school, the agency also sent five personnel to the inspector general of Texas for an official examination. Together, the actions totaled to an admission that, although the Texas state police director, Steven McCraw, had publicly placed the culpability for the inadequate police reaction on Pete Arredondo, the then Uvalde schools police chief, other deputies at the incident were also reported to share the blame.
This modification in practice was deemed beneficial since the police force was mainly held accountable for the allegedly delayed reaction. This implies that the public safety officer department reacting to an aggressive shooter scenario in any institution will be working under particular regulations than those used in Uvalde, Texas, where dozens of personnel did not immediately attack the shooter because they believed he was contained. This circumstance permitted a protracted countering. The police officers hurried to the institution but never entered the attacked classrooms to face the shooter for more than one hour, delaying the treatment of the injured students and teachers (Goodman, 2022). This allowed the gunman to commit more acts of violence since most victims were defenseless young minors and unarmed instructors. Arredondo, terminated a few days after the killing, started treating the shooter, who had momentarily ceased firing in two linked classrooms, as a blocked target. Officers could have conceivably concentrated on bargaining a stand down or planning an entrance under such a process. In an email to public safety department personnel, McCraw referred to the late reaction as a “mistake.” In the email, he outlined how state police should now react.
The DPS personnel called to the school regarding the shooter would be given the authority to bypass any delays to neutralize an attacker. This is another approach that is being considered for increasing replies to attacks. According to McCraw, a person should not be considered a “barred subject” if they have fired a firearm inside a school since they are considered an active attacker until they have been incapacitated (Goodman, 2022). The revised policy that McCraw released looked different from other agencies in that it seemed to emphasize the demand to continue pursuing a shooter until the individual is neutralized. According to. McCraw, the new directive differs from the coaching that the office had initially given and the strategy that was advised by the Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training Centre (ALERRTC), which was used by the Texas security forces and other agencies around the nation.  According to a professor at New York University’s John Jay College, many aspects of the law enforcement reaction in Uvalde highlighted a need for reform.
In the following months after the shooting, the reaction of police other than Arredondo, notably sever...