Specific Guidelines for the Assessment Evaluations
Assessment Evaluation Instructions
Overview: The purpose of this assignment is to research, evaluate, and understand valid, reliable, fair, and appropriate assessment tools used in schools to screen, diagnose, and measure student academic achievement. There are 2 Assessment Evaluation assignments in the course, each with a different focus. They are:
1. LITERACY FOCUS, which all candidates complete (Assessment Evaluation 1 – Reading)
2. CONTENT FOCUS*, which is specific to your degree program.
*Assessment Evaluation 2 – (Behavioral, Remediation, or Intervention)
• Reading Specialist candidates will complete a remediation evaluation with a focus on reading, spelling, and/or writing.
• Special education candidates will complete an intervention evaluation with a focus on reading or behavior.
• School counselor candidates will complete an intervention evaluation with a focus on behavior.
• Math Specialist candidates will complete a remediation evaluation with math concepts.
Note: Be sure to complete the correct focus area for Assessment Evaluation 2.
Since education assessment instruments are costly and not listed in the course materials, this assignment consists of researching and evaluating assessment instruments. If your school has any education kit(s) discussed in this assignment, you are permitted to review the testing materials on your own, however, this is not required. A citation would be included on the reference page.
Specific Guidelines for the Assessment Evaluations
Step 1 – Research
1. Select 4 instruments from the Approved Assessment Instruments List. (See separate document.)
2. Using Buros Mental Measurements, examine 4 measurement studies or measurement reviews about the existing measures from the Approved Assessment Instruments List. There should be 4 assessments reviewed for both Assessment Evaluation assignments (8 total).
3. Critically analyze the measures, addressing strengths and weaknesses. There is a data collection template provided to ease the process of collecting information. Each section of the template should be well-developed and written in complete sentences. The template is submitted with the assignment. Each critical analysis should include the following:
• A Summary of the assessment instrument with clear, specific information unique to the instrument, including the population who could be tested with the instrument.
• An analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the measure. There must be a minimum of 2 reasons to support each one.
• Justification for why the measurement would be an appropriate measure for different populations.
4. Repeat #3 for each of the 4 instruments.
5. Use a separate data collection template for each instrument. Save each as a Microsoft Word document labeled: instrumentname.doc
NOTE: When submitting the evaluation, these separate templates must be compiled, along with all other items, into 1 Word document.
6. Other resources for research are listed in the syllabus and may be used in addition to Buros. If using the testing instrument manual, list it in the references. Buros is directly accessible through the JLF library database for your convenience.
Step 2 – Written Report
1. Organize and format each assessment instrument with the headings and subheadings outlined below. Do not write the questions or statements from the data collection template. Write in well-formed paragraphs that flow logically from one topic to the next.
2. Each instrument review should contain a minimum of 2 pages of content, including the data collection template, in addition to the cover page and reference page. Format the paper in current APA. The data collection template will be used as a chart in the report at the end of each instrument review.
3. The total paper (10 pages) should be presented in this order:
• Title Page (1 page)
• 8 Pages of Content
o Assessment Evaluation (AE) 1
o Completed AE 1 template
o AE 2
o Completed AE 2 template
o AE 3
o Completed AE 3 template
o AE 4
o Completed AE 4 template
• Reference Page (1 page) – All assessments should be referenced in current APA format.
4. Format each written assessment evaluation with the title, “Analysis of Assessment Name,” using the following headings.
• Summary of Assessment
• Strengths and Weaknesses of the Assessment
• Justification and Use of the Assessment
• Insert data collection template as a chart
Step 3 – Communication of Assessment Results is for Reading and Math Specialist Candidates Only
NOTE: Reading and Math Specialist Candidates must also complete the Communication of Assessment Results template after completing Assessment Evaluation 2. The template, directions, and rubric are available in LiveText under the links, Test Administration Project for Reading Specialists Only or Test Administration Project for Math Specialists Only.
Submit Assessment Evaluation 1 by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 2.
Submit Assessment Evaluation 2 by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 4.
Reading and Math Specialist Candidates, submit Test Administration Project: Step 3—
Communication of Assessment Results in LiveText after submitting Assessment Evaluation 2 in Blackboard.
Assessment Instruments
Name
Institution/ Affiliation
Introduction
Assessment is a vital element in learning, as it helps students develop and maintain skills and knowledge. By requesting a learner to demonstrate their understanding on a subject matter, helps improve the learning process, as it assists in evaluating whether educational goals, standards, and objectives are achieved. Moreover, assessment informs the decision on aspects of student placement, grading, and the advancement of instructional needs, curriculum development, and budget allocation. Assessment, allows education stakeholders to determine the effectiveness and impacts of various programs in improving students performance. Interestingly, assessment identifies the strength and weakness in many aspects of the education system, which forms the basis of continuous improvements. On the other hand, students need to understand that not only reading and arithmetic skills are essential, but also the skills that will allow them to advance in the evolving world. As a result, students must possess skills that will enable them to reason critically, analyze situations, and make informed decisions. Generally, to improve the skills and knowledge, students require a continuous update of the learning goals. Assessment and instruction play critical role in the development of the learning goals. Consequently, all education players need to take an active part in enhancing decisions on the purpose and the extent of such assessment.
Adaptive Behavior Assessment System
Adaptive behavior assessment system is a comprehensive norm-referenced assessment tool used in the evaluation of adaptive skills essential for daily living of individuals from birth to 89 years. Commonly, the assessment can be utilized in multiple individual’s environments such as home, school community, and, work settings. The tool has three domains, which include social skills, conceptual and practical skills. The tool also has supplemental subsets, which include; self-care, communication, self-direction, health and safety, functional academics, social skills, work, community use, leisure, and home living. Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System assists in the diagnosis and classification of disabilities as well as medical and clinical disorders as well as monitor and document individual performances over time. Moreover, the tool helps in the identification of functional skills strengths and weaknesses in a person’s daily living environment as well as the identification of intervention program evaluation. Adaptive behavior assessment system is an invaluable tool in the assessment of individuals that may be experiencing difficulties with the daily skills a necessary for functioning effectively in their environments (Harrison & Oakland, 2015)
Strengths and weakness of adaptive behaviour assessment system
Adaptive behavior assessment is considered beneficial as it provides norms that include a proportionate sample of socioeconomic status, allows diagnosis and treatment of mental retardation by providing an evaluation of the social, conceptual and social skills that incorporates scores for the ten capabilities that are vital to the assessment of mental retardation. Further, the instrument, is available in a questionnaire format, hence allowing a comprehensive assessment of adaptive behavior; the tool allows for broader coverage of children and youth, which include parents and teachers forms for clients ages birth to 21 years. Scoring is through scoring assistant software that enables scoring and profiling in a few minutes. The tool also uses Spanish language parent and teacher’s forms. Alternatively, adaptive behavior assessment system offers a guessing score that plays a critical role in determining whether the respondent has sufficient information needed to complete the rating form that does not require a parent or teacher interview. On the other hand, the normative tool sample of school-based with disabilities is poorly represented. Moreover, the tool lacks parent involvement, so many rating forms which require the precedence as well the reliability of the instrument being questionable (Harrison & Oakland, 2015).
Name of Instrument
Author(s) of Instrument
Date of Publication
Publisher
Describe the subtests (e.g., learning areas)
Describe the age range.
State the purpose of the instrument.
Describe the examiner qualifications.
Describe the available scores.
Describe the instrument’s technical data provided (i.e., validity, reliability, norms, research).
Describe features of the instrument that provide well-designed and easy-to-follow administration procedures.
State the approximate administration and scoring time.
Describe features of the scoring procedures that are well designed and easy to follow.
Explain this instrument’s adaptation for students with limited English proficiency
Explain the appropriateness of the instrument for use with children who have disabilities.
Describe the adaptation of the instrument for use with children who have special needs.
Adaptive Behavior assessment system is an effective tool for students with special needs. Commonly, the test depends on the caregiver and parent knowledge on a student.
Describe the strengths of the instrument.
State any weaknesses of the instrument.
Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised
Autism diagnostic interview-revised is a homogenous, semi-structured, investigator-based interview diagnostic tool, administered by trained clinicians to parents or caregivers of individuals referred for a possible autism spectrum disorder. The instrument offers for diagnostic algorithm for individuals who have autism as described in international classification of diseases, tenth revision and diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition. The tool is useful for children with mental challenges from the age of eighteen months and above. The instrument includes three main areas, which include; qualities of reciprocal social interaction, communication, and language, restricted and repetitive, stereotyped interests and behaviors, which have 93 items. All the things in the autism diagnostic interview-revised are coded for current and past practice. The current refers to actions that have occurred in the past three months, while the past may refer to behavior that may have happened to an individual or specifically within a defined time, for example, four of five years. Commonly, the interview starts with a...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
The Federal Reserve Rate Of 2016
2 pages/≈550 words | 2 Sources | APA | Mathematics & Economics | Essay |
-
Forum 3: Is There A Historical Relationship In The US Between Class And Race?
1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | APA | Mathematics & Economics | Essay |
-
Macroeconomics In Current Life: Falling Interest Rates In America
4 pages/≈1100 words | No Sources | APA | Mathematics & Economics | Essay |