McDonald's Operations Management and Christian Integration

Operations Management and Christian Integration
Student's Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Name and Number
Professor's Name
Date
Operations Management and Christian Integration
Ethical Dilemma
When a McDonald's drive-through consumer dumped a cup of scorching hot coffee on herself a while back, it made international news (Heizer et al., 2017). The seriously scorched 80-year-old woman won 2.9 million dollars in court, alleging the coffee was just too hot to be shipped securely in a car. (The penalty was eventually lowered to $640,000 by the magistrate.) The cup stated, "Warning—Contents May Be Hot." McDonald's asserted the product was delivered according to the correct standards and good quality.
Notwithstanding numerous coffee-scalding accusations over the last decade, McDonald's coffee is significantly hotter (by company mandate) than ordinary restaurant coffee. Interestingly, similar court instances led to fewer awards favoring the plaintiffs (Heizer et al., 2017). For example, a drive-through consumer claimed Motor City Bagel Shop for a spilled cup of coffee, and a lady claimed Starbucks for spilling coffee with her foot.
Evaluation of Ethical Dilemma
In this case, the companies were wrong. Among the most prestigious tasks for the management team is to provide consumers with hygienic, secure, and high-quality goods and services. Due to insufficient design and manufacturing methods, poor-quality creation contributes to improved manufacturing costs and accidents, litigation, and increasing government control (Burcea, 2019). If a business considers it has given hypothetically unsafe produce, ethical conduct must oversee the suitable reaction (Peacock, 2015). It might be a worldwide remembrance, similar to the ones carried out by Perrier (for sparkling water) and Johnson & Johnson (for Tylenol) when their goods were discovered to be tainted.
Any producer who releases a low-quality product in the market must assume accountability. Shareholders, workers, consumers, vendors, retailers, and creditors are many players engaged in manufacturing and selling low-quality goods. Leadership must examine whether these partners have been harmed as a point of ethics (Peacock, 2015). Each business must establish fundamental principles that serve as daily standards for every person, from the CEO to the manufacturing line workers.
The leaders should practice Total quality management (TQM). TQM relates to a focus on quality throughout a company, from suppliers to customers (Peacock, 2015). TQM emphasizes the organization's commitment to a continuous corporate-wide push for perfection in all elements of goods and services that matter to customers. Every one of the ten choices the management team makes is related to understanding and addressing customer requirements somehow (Peacock, 2015). Achieving those demands necessitates focusing on TQM if a company thrives as a global leader.
Several firms have developed a poor reputation just by existing. Companies, according to some, are only concerned with getting profit, but that is the background. It is what it is known as in its truest sense. Earning profit is not necessarily a bad thing (Almaz, 2021). The way that some companies behave themselves raises the issue of ethical conduct. Ethics are required for a firm to be publicly acceptable. The company should satisfy all customers, staff, and the surroundings. A company must also present itself as publicly appropriate and apt to build a customer base (Burcea, 2019). To be effective in this, everyone must understand what it takes to run a genuine, reliable, and trusted firm.
The ethics of a specific firm can be very different. They relate not just to how a company connects with the rest of the globe and engages with a single consumer (Burcea, 2019). Great business ethics can be defined as the ideas and norms that govern corporate conduct. Recognizing and implementing ethical notions is a fundamental aspect that the companies emphasize among appropriate authorities, notably in today's culture (Peacock, 2015). The belief is that, since producers are in a better position than customers and must depend on them, they have a specific responsibility to guarantee that the goods they give do not hurt consumers' objectives.
The belief is that a producer should be held liable for any damages induced by item faults, even if the company took all reasonable precautions in designing, manufacturing, and promoting the product. The harm could not be predicted (Almaz, 2021). Product damages are outside expenses that should be absorbed as a portion of the price of marketing a product, as this optimizes usefulness and more evenly spreads payments. Companies are being maltreated because compensating justice dictates that harmed parties should only be reimbursed if the harm was predictable and avoidable. Notions assume incorrectly that the social cost perspective prevents mishaps (Peacock, 2015). Conversely, it promotes consumer irresponsibility by absolving them of liability for their injuries.
Some principles have expanded the proportion of successful customer lawsuits, causing insurance providers to suffer heavy casualties and making insurance prohibitively expensive for small businesses. Companies begin with the best of intentions. They work difficult to build and manufacture quality goods, appropriately promote them, and provide customers with enough cautions just as the company's cups read in this case and directions to ensure that their interests are used safely and correctly (Burcea, 2019). However, des...