100% (1)
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
3
Style:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 19.44
Topic:

MBA 699 (7-1)

Essay Instructions:
MBA 699 Module Seven Case Analysis Guidelines and Rubric Overview An important aspect of a change management strategy is to consider how different alternatives may impact future outcomes. Organizations often use the business case method to explore strategic alternatives as it helps simulate a real situation. Such simulations help with identifying business issues and provide critical information that organizations can then use to arrive at their own conclusions. The VP of business development has asked you to analyze other organizations that have gone through the exit process. Doing so will help you identify common risks, challenges, and best practices related to mergers and acquisitions and apply this knowledge to guide the change management strategy of the life sciences organization. For example, if two merging organizations have extremely different communication styles or organizational cultures, it may often lead to conflict between the management and the employees. The same is true when one organization is acquiring another organization. Therefore, it is important that you identify all potential risks and challenges and include the best practices to avoid similar conflicts in your organization after it has been acquired. You have decided to research a business case that may help you learn from the experiences of another organization. The focus of your analysis should be on change management and the associated best practices that impacted the transformation of the organization in the case. Prompt Review the case study Bumpy Road Ahead: The Automotive Interiors Merger That Wasn’t. Next, consider the following steps to complete your analysis of the automotive case and apply your findings from the case analysis to your work in the life sciences organization in the course scenario. Specifically, you must address the following criteria: Case Study Review Provide a brief overview of the two organizations in the case study that addresses the following: Identify common characteristics of each organization. Explain how the products and services of the two organizations differ. Describe the key issues that affected the merger plan and its implementation. What were the key issues related to organizational cultures and structural integration that created problems after the merger of the two organizations? Support your response with information from the case. Evaluate the postmerger integration and change management strategies used in the case. Your response should address the following: How did the key decision makers respond to the challenges with the postmerger integration? What led to the challenges faced by the organization after the merger? Could these challenges have been prevented using different change management strategies? Explain. Recommendations Based on your findings from the case study, describe specific areas that may lead to post-acquisition risks and challenges for the life sciences organization in the course scenario. Support your response. Recommend change management best practices the life sciences organization can use for managing post-acquisition integration in a planned manner and avoid the risks and challenges you’ve identified above. What to Submit Submit a 4- to 5-page Word document using double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style. Consult the Shapiro Library APA Style Guide for more information on citations.
Essay Sample Content Preview:
MBA 699 (7-1) Student's Name Institution Affiliation Course Name & Code Instructor's Name Date MBA 699 (7-1) Characteristics, Products, and Services of the Companies in the Merger In reference to the previous modules, the acquisition is a lengthy procedure that needs proper attention from all the organizations engaging in merging. This case study, "Bumpy Road Ahead: The Automotive Interiors Merger That Wasn't," majors on two automotive companies, the American Automotive and BarcelonaBrand Auto Incorporations. American Automotive started its operations in 1955 with its founder, Alan Smith. On top of that, in 1960, the company was listed on the New York Stock Exchange due to the frequent developments that made it big (Sousa & Comiteau, 2021). The company is recognized worldwide for generating the best automotive interior parts, such as seating and instrument panels. In addition, the American automotive company also produces overhead systems and interior lighting. By 2006, the company had hired 320 employees who helped provide services, generating 200 million dollars as their total income. In contrast, BarcelonaBrand Auto, a small company that Luis Barros established in 1995, is located in Barcelona's area called the La España Industrial Park. The company majored in making luxury automotive interiors for vehicles. In addition, BarcelonaBrand Auto is well known for its ability to be innovative in all the models it makes. By 2005, the company had hired 250 employees and could raise a total income of 40 million dollars (Sousa & Comiteau, 2021). In the day-to-day operations of BarcelonaBrand Auto company, it strictly followed its set values, goals, and entrepreneurial skills, and it was committed to achieving high-quality results that made the company recognized as a fast-growing automotive company. The differences between the two firms are the source of the challenges that the two organizations face at the time of the merger and after. Critical Issues Related to Organizational Cultures and Structural Integration The merger between American Automotive and BarcelonaBrand Auto was affected by various vital issues. The core challenge is the structural modifications and adjustments being done to the companies. Despite Smith and BBA agreeing to keep their identities separate, the BarcelonaBrand Auto plan of KLM-Air France was eliminated, thus interfering with their structure (Sousa & Comiteau, 2021). Similarly, Smith's structure entailed formal and structured strategies for its operations that were found difficult to adopt by BBA based on informal and entrepreneurial techniques. This frequent colliding of cultures increased conflicts between the company's workforce. Finally, American Automotive specializes in standardized products, whereas BarcelonaBrand Auto majored in luxury interiors, which caused frequent friction in sales and overall operations. During the merger, another challenge concerning orga...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!