Managing High-Performing Teams Management Essay Paper
Instructions-please use rubrics file to answer questions.
Here's some information to keep in mind as you work through this competency:
This assessment allows for a deep exploration of conflict and how to manage through tough situations to keep the team moving forward. If conflict is handled in a cordial and constructive manner, it serves a useful purpose in the organization because conflict denotes greater levels of thought and analysis or perspective among members. Organizations are becoming more diverse and multicultural. This presents both an opportunity and a challenge. However, cultural diversity is only one source of conflict and by no means should it become a default for why conflict exists.
There is interpersonal conflict and intergroup conflict. This assessment reflects both. With interpersonal conflict (within the team), analyze the team dynamics such as role structures, behavioral norms, cohesiveness, and formal or informal leadership. It is important to understand that at the group level, the conflict may be driven by differing organizational strategies and practices. Both forms require proper attention and intervention.
The latter part of the assessment, asks you to think through some very specific strategies to ensure the team progresses in that positive, collaborative manner. These strategies may serve to minimize future conflict. Inadvertently, some managerial practices, such as poor communication, may cause conflict because team members do not have all of the information needed to be productive. In management, we often must look at ourselves to assess our roles in both leading the team or hindering it.
I hope that provides you with an overview of the criteria for this competency. Please let me know if you have any questions or I can help you in any way!
Access the following to complete this Assessment:
• SolarComm Communication and Collaboration Team Biographies
• LM008 Short Answer Submission Form (with Rubric)
• Academic Writing Expectations Checklist
To complete this Assessment:
o Download the Academic Writing Expectations Checklist to use as a guide when completing your Assessment. Responses that do not meet the expectations of scholarly writing will be returned without scoring. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided where appropriate.
o Download the LM008 Short Answer Submission Form, which includes the Rubric for this Assessment. Complete the form adhering to the criteria presented in the Rubric.
This Assessment requires submission of one (1) document, a completed Short Answer Submission Form. Save this file as LM008_firstinitial_lastname (for example, LM008_J_Smith). When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.
SolarComm Communication and Collaboration Team Biographies
Name: Sean Flannigan
Functional Group: Engineering
Title: Lead Power Systems Engineer
Location: Boston, MA
Years of Experience: 27
Education: PhD, University of Virginia
Skills: Leadership and employee management; project management; technology and risk assessment; financial modeling; budgeting; working knowledge of power systems and components; photovoltaic systems design; contract review and negotiation; working knowledge of regulations; and construction monitoring
Diverse Cultural Perspectives: Although he would not think of himself as privileged, Sean has progressed in his education and career by identifying goals and working hard until he achieved them. He attributes all of his success to his work ethic. Sean finds common ground with people most easily when they share his interests in science, math, and a functional design.
Characteristics: Analytical; creative; interested in mechanical and technical projects; performs well in technology-focused leadership roles; highly process-oriented; strong verbal and graphical communication skills; data-driven; and a scientific approach to decision making
Behaviors: Sean meets annual project requirements on time and budget. He and his team act autonomously and with minimal oversight in the field. He requests access to research findings, thorough documentation, and other evidence of efficacy before adopting a new product or process. He speaks candidly when he sees reason for concern. Because his work requires him to spend a lot of time managing a team in the field, he prefers brief, tactical phone calls instead of extended, strategy meetings.
Background: Sean has been a lead power systems engineer for 6 years. Before that, he spent 10 years as a systems engineer for a major utility company in the western United States, where he managed a large team of technicians. Prior to that, he was a respected research scientist at a large state institution. The other power systems engineers at SolarComm elected Sean to speak for them and defer to Sean if asked for more participation. They provided Sean with a year of records showing that a dozen essential components arrived behind schedule. Records also showed that four major components were not manufactured to specification. Many of the Engineers told Sean that SolarComm’s problems originated from poorly negotiated procurement agreements that do not penalize the manufacturer when problems occur.
Name: Irma Trujillo
Functional Group: Procurement
Title: Procurement Manager
Location: Austin, TX
Years of Experience: 6
Education: Bachelor of Science, Economics
Skills: Logistics and planning; thoroughly knowledgeable in SolarComm systems, including databases, presentation tools, and contracts database; able to understand and communicate highly technical information in a global, cross-functional, and multicultural work environment; and is fluent in English and Spanish
Diverse Cultural Perspectives: Although Irma’s parents made little money, when she was young they paid for her to tuition at a private, college-preparatory school in the suburbs of Houston, Texas. She has never forgotten the sacrifices they made to ensure she would have more opportunity than they did. She is no stranger to proving herself in academic and professional life.
Characteristics: Analytical; highly organized; meticulous; deadline-oriented; strong implementation skills; and prefers a structured work environment
Behaviors: Irma works diligently during regular hours, usually between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. (Central Time, U.S.), but makes adjustments to her schedule to accommodate business partners in Malaysia, China, and South Africa. She still defers to her previous manager, Bob Teller, when business partners request substantial changes to schedule, cost, or contract terms.
Background: Irma began her career at SolarComm 6 years ago as a business analyst. After 2 years of success, she elected to make a lateral move to the procurement group because she possesses both an aptitude and preference for logistics. She was promoted to procurement manager 8 months ago and manages a team of three procurement coordinators. Five months ago her manager, Bob Teller, called her into his office to discuss what he called “a concern from the field.” In the meeting, Irma learned that Sean Flannigan had sent an e-mail to her manager that blamed Irma and her team for failing to fulfill orders for custom-made components on time and to the quality mandated by law. When given an opportunity to explain her side of the story, Irma replied that Sean’s team changed the specifications for at least three of the projects. The changes made it impossible for her team to procure the correct components on the original schedule. Irma left Bob’s office and returned to work feeling angry at Sean for betraying their relationship and escalating the problem to her manager.
Name: Sandra Cummins
Functional Group: Sales
Title: Regional Manager
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Years of Experience: 12
Education: Bachelor of Science, Engineering
Skills: Highly skilled at communicating complex, highly technical processes; trained in and expert practitioner of consultative sales techniques and SPIN selling techniques; adept at B2B and B2C sales methodology; and expert in the customer relationship management software (CRM) and other SolarComm systems
Diverse Cultural Perspectives: As a veteran of the United States Armed Forces, Sandra has unique skills and experiences that work. In addition to a high tolerance for stress and a mission-focused approach to her work, she has traveled and lived abroad on deployments to Europe, the Middle East, and South East Asia.
Characteristics: Mission focused; a strategic planner; bottom line-oriented; expert at moving the sales process forward; timely; strives to exceed the expectations; and empathic
Behaviors: Sandra achieved goals for the past 3 years as a solar consultant and is working hard to become an equally successful regional manager. She spends the majority of her time working directly with her team of solar consultants to drive business and has little time for additional projects. She has expressed an interest in continuing to grow within the business development group and knows the next promotion depends on demonstrated success in her current position.
Background: After serving in the United States Air Force, Sandra began her career in the solar power industry as a solar consultant for one of SolarComm’s top competitors. She proved herself an excellent sales representative by exceeding her sales goal consistently for 3 years and qualifying as a company-wide top performer 2 years in a row. The SolarComm Business Development team actively recruited her for the open regional manager position in Salt Lake City, Utah. She currently oversees a team of 13 solar consultants in a geographical region spanning from western Colorado to western Utah. In the past year, she has worked hard to network with managers throughout the company. Recently, her team has experienced delays in component shipments that have cost them future revenue. She never experienced such problems when she worked for her previous employer and is eager to find a fix.
Name: Aardash Bhatnagar
Functional Group: Sales
Title: Regional Manager, Inland Empire
Location: Riverside, CA
Years of Experience: 32
Education: Bachelor of Science, Business
Skills: Highly skilled at communicating complex, highly technical processes; able to establish credibility and good will with executive decision makers at key accounts; and competent in the customer relationship management software (CRM) and other SolarComm systems
Diverse Cultural Perspectives: Aardash immigrated to the United States and has been pursuing opportunities to establish himself as a leader in the community, raise a healthy family, and enjoy life ever since. His optimistic, determined outlook has driven him to succeed at one company after another over the past 32 years.
Characteristics: Self-starter; entrepreneurial; relationship focused; steady performer; entrenched in the industry; and sought after by close competitors
Behaviors: Aardash built strong relationships with his largest customers and actively maintains contact with them. He sponsors professional networking events and invites his customers to social events like family gatherings. He regularly achieves revenue goals. However, his region also suffers from high turnover of solar consultants who complain that Aardash undermines their decision-making authority in their territory.
Background: Aardash immigrated to the United States from northern India at the age of 18 and earned his Bachelor of Science in Business from the University of Colorado, Boulder. His sales career began at Lockheed Martin, a global company with offices in the suburbs of Denver, Colorado. Two years later, he accepted a promotion and relocated to Lancaster, California, where he acted as the lead business development officer at an electric car company. He later worked as a manager of business development and community development for California’s largest power utility provider. Seven years ago, Aardash joined SolarComm as the regional manager for the Inland Empire. Despite his reputation for undermining new solar consultants, upper management regards him as an effective mediator who can quickly dispel tense situations. The recent problems with components that have plagued other customers have had little impact on his business.
Name: Peter Brueggeman
Functional Group: Human Resources
Title: Human Resources Manager
Location: University of California, Los Angeles
Years of Experience: 7
Education: Bachelor of Arts, Education
Skills: Performance management; organization development; employee onboarding, development, and needs assessment, and training; policy development and documentation; and communication
Diverse Cultural Perspectives: Peter is passionate about employee rights and social equality in the workplace. His interest stems, at least in part, from his own experiences as a young man who was teased and bullied by his classmates.
Characteristics: Comfortable with ambiguity; analytical; strategic; persuasive; empathic; knowledgeable of company policies, employment law, and organizational behavior; ability to influence management; and ability to develop and implement employee training
Behaviors: One month ago, Peter was hired by SolarComm. He appears bright, eager to succeed, and excited to work with you on the team.
Background: Peter began his career in human resources 7 years ago at a software company based in California. The company was recently acquired by a large competitor, and Peter played a key role in the transition. Afterward, he returned to his hometown in Austin, Texas, where he joined SolarComm.
Short Answer Submission Form
Your Name: First and last
Your Email address: Your email here
1 Using the information provided in the SolarComm Communication and Collaboration Team Biographies case study, identify two or more employees on the team who may not get along, and explain why. (1–2 paragraphs)
Your Response
Based on the biographies of the employees, the people in the team who may not get along are Sean Flannigan and Irma Trujillo, Sean Flannigan and Sandra Cummins, and Sean Flannigan and Aardash Bhatnagar. Flannigan and Trujillo had a previous conflict secondary to the late procurement of the materials need on Flannigan’s Project. This is due to the former’s indecisiveness that led to the abrupt changes to three of his projects which consumed the latter’s time. Thus, Trujillo’s team was not able to fulfill Flannigan’s request. Similarly, Flannigan may have future conflicts against Cummins secondary to the latter’s history of delayed shipments. Both of these scenarios neglect the most significant move in building an organized and efficient team which is vulnerability-based trust, where each team members recognize everyone’s mistakes and handles the situation without provocation (Searle, Nienaber, Weibel, & Den Hartog, 2016). Flannigan may not get along with Bhatnagar because of his attitudes such as lack of patience, time-restrictedness, and aggressiveness. Also, his long-term experience gives him the idea that he, among all of the team members, has the greatest proficiency. Moreover, based on the biography, Flannigan dwells on mistakes over the members’ excellent performance. Bhatnagar, on the other hand, has the opposite attributes of Flannigan where he is patient and can resolve disputes due to his calmness. Opposite personalities are often the source of conflict, especially within a group (Simmel, 2010). Moreover, Bhatnagar, being an excellent employee, gets provoked by his competitors and one of them might be Flannigan in the future.
2 Describe two strategies to ensure the team members identified in prompt #1 work effectively together.
Your Response
Conflict is an inevitable feature of a team. To resolve the conflicts present within this team, the first step is to engage team members positively at their first meeting. This shall be facilitated by someone outside the group. The facilitator shall request all the team members to gather and reflect on the current situation they are in. Then, the facilitator shall ask all the members to reflect on their previous actions that must have affected other members in the group, whether positively or negatively. After this reflection, each member shall vocalize the nuisances that one has against the other while all the other team members listen carefully (Runde & Flanagan, 2010). The second technique dwells on the identification of the prospective issues that may arise. Strong personalities and emotions are the most common root causes of conflict in an organization. With this in mind, all the team members shall identify all of their positive and negative characteristics and reflect on the forthcoming issues that may arise from their attributes. After reflecting, the team shall formulate a specific step-by-step process on how to face and resolve possible conflicts in the future. Everyone in the team shall also be encouraged to participate fully during these discussions (Runde & Flanagan, 2010).
3 Describe three conflicts that may arise between employees of SolarComm Communication. Explain why each conflict may arise given the employee characteristics and other contextual factors. (3–4 paragraphs)
Your Response
Sean Flannigan may have a future conflict against Sandra Cummins and Peter Brueggeman concerning the consequences when a team member has incurred a mistake. All of them are driven. However, Sean Flannigan always strives to exceed expectations which he demonstrates by being heavily reliable on the scientific process to gain success. Moreover, Flannigan has strong verbal skills which leads to conflict with people with high emotional intelligence quotient like Cummins and Brueggeman. It has been stated that Cummins and Brueggeman are empathic, which leads to the idea that these team members will not tolerate harsh treatments like Flannigan’s actions against Irma Trujillo’s mistake that significantly damaged the latter’s reputation.High-performing teams tend to have excellent team members who might compete for a position (Colenso, 2012). In this team, it is evident that Sean Flannigan, Irma Trujillo, Sandra Cummins, and Aardash Bhatnagar are the achievers of their generation. Competing against the top position requires specific qualities, experiences, and achievements which all of them possess, making the competition harder. Thus, this may result in conflict such as frequent sabotages, lack of cooperation, possible threats, and crab mentality (Colenso, 2012). Differences in individual goals and strategies are also the root causes of conflicts (Pettigrew, 2014). In this case, Flannigan, Trujilla, and Cummins have different orientations as to goal. Flannigan is exceedingly process-oriented; Trujilla is deadline-oriented; and Cummins is outcome-oriented. Because of these differences, each of them may have difficulty in formulating a team strategy. Flannigan may focus and meticulously formulate the step-by-step process which may take a massive amount of time. This may become an issue to Trujilla whose concern is about the deadline. On the other hand, Trujilla may have a future conflict with Cummins because the former is concerned primarily on the on-time with minimal expectations on the outcome, while Cummins interest lies on the outcome irrespective of the time.
4 For each conflict identified in prompt #3, plan an intervention to help the team constructively engage in, and benefit from, conflict. (3–4 paragraphs)
Your Response
To resolve the first conflict stated, all the team members shall have a meeting to identify personal differences on the first day of working together. This shall allow for personal reflection and better communication concerning personality differences. This shall be facilitated by the guidance counselor of the HR department of the company who should have expertise in psychology. Each member shall engage in the vocalization of their known personality problems to enlighten the other group members. Next, each member shall enumerate the possible conflicts that may arise within the team and the possible solutions to these. In this way, everyone can benefit since fewer conflicts shall pave a way for a more efficient work and a more effective work environment (Runde & Flanagan, 2010).To avoid conflict and to promote a positive competition among high achievers, the company shall clarify its objectives to encourage the employees to align their objectives with the goals of the company. Next, since high achievers tend to become uninterested in easily bored, the company should provide them better opportunities and a room for enhancement. The starting step is to prepare a self-SWOT analysis. In this way, these employees will have an overview of their strengths and weaknesses and it will help them align their personal goals with that of the company. Moreover, it will give them a lead on which aspects of their personality or which skills necessitate training and management. After this, the company shall provide them a platform on where they can expand their talents. Thus, cross-training with other positions in the company may be helpful. Using these strategies, these employees can prevent conflicts and promote healthy competitions not just among other members but also within themselves (Leiding, 2010). The best way to resolve the conflict concerning the differences in goals is to promote collaborative behavior and provide training on how to apply collaborative behavior. The first step in collaboration is to build trust. This is essential to avoid miscommunication among the team members. Flannigan, Trujilla, and Cummins shall identify and vocalize their goals. Upon recognizing the differences, they shall collaboratively decide on who will take which task or assign the member who will become responsible for the specific process. For example, Flannigan shall be responsible for formulating the step-by-step process within a specific timeframe to prevent...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
550 SLP MOD 3 Management Essay Research Coursework
3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | APA | Management | Essay |
-
550 CASE MOD 3 Management Essay Research Coursework
3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | APA | Management | Essay |
-
550 2ND WEEK POST Management Essay Research Coursework
1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | APA | Management | Essay |