Leadership Analysis Paper: Condoleezza Rice Management Essay

Option #1: Leadership Analysis Paper: Choose Your Leaders

Choose the two leaders you are going to use for your portfolio project. ONE NEEDS TO BE A MALE AND ONE NEEDS TO BE A FEMALE.. In a one-page paper, provide your instructor with a brief history of each leader to make sure they are acceptable for the project. You must identify both leaders and organizations, and provide a URL to the website of either the leaders or the organizations.

12/13/2020 Module 8: Portfolio Project https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/36189/assignments/717779?module_item_id=1688449 1/7 Module 8: Portfolio Project Points 275 Submitting a media recording or a file upload Submit Assignment Portfolio Project (275 Points) Important! Read First Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission. Option #1: Leadership Analysis Paper For this Portfolio Project paper, you will choose two leaders, one male and one female. These two leaders do not need to be from the same organization. One leader should be what you would consider "effective and successful" and the other should be what you would consider "ineffective and unsuccessful." Compare these two leaders regarding their leadership characteristics, use of power and influence, and how these relate to their effectiveness or lack of effectiveness within their respective organization. The entire portfolio project is worth 35% of your overall grade for this course. Make sure to use research to back up your statements within the paper. You will need to address each of the following as they relate to your two leaders. Each element is worth equal value. Instructions: A brief background and organizational framework for each leader, including job title and general description, industry in which they work, number of subordinates they supervise, and their leadership level within the organization (lower level, middle level, executive level) A comparison of the techniques used by each leader to gain power in his or her role within the organization A comparison of how subordinates relate to each leader, including how much influence the subordinates have on each leader 12/13/2020 Module 8: Portfolio Project https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/36189/assignments/717779?module_item_id=1688449 2/7 An analysis of how each leader uses influence to change the behavior of other leaders, coworkers, and subordinates within the organization A comparison of the techniques used by each leader to influence employee motivation An analysis of self-destructive tendencies (dark characteristics) of each leader, and how these tendencies affect the organization A comparison of how each leader rewards employees, and how effective the reward systems are An analysis of which leadership theory best describes each leader and the reasons why you selected the leadership theory based on research Requirements: Your paper must be 8-10 pages in length, not counting the required title, abstract (http://uss.tufts.edu/arc/HOW%20TO%20WRITE%20AN%20ABSTRACT%20for%20Tufts%20Symp.pdf) , and reference pages. You must back up your analysis with at least six references not used as required or recommended readings in this course. The CSU Global Library is a good place to find these sources. You may also use additional credible sources including newspapers, trade journals, government reports, and white papers. You may not use Wikipedia in any CSU Global course. You may use course required or recommended readings as additional sources over the required six references. Include a cover page denoting the paper title, your name, the course number and name, your instructor's name, and the date you are making the submission. Include an outline or table of contents. Include a brief abstract statement summarizing your hypothesis or findings. Conform to APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (http://csuglobal.libguides.com/apacitations) . Use APA citations where appropriate, and include an APA- formatted reference page at the end. Review the Portfolio Project Rubric for more information on how you will be graded on this assignment. Reach out to your instructor with any questions. Option #2: Leadership Analysis Presentation For this Portfolio Project presentation, you will choose two well-known leaders in different countries and cultures (for example, a leader from the United States and a leader from China). You will compare these two leaders in terms of their leadership styles, their methods for gaining power and influence, and their success and effectiveness as a leader. The entire portfolio project is worth 35% of your overall grade for this course. Make sure to use research to back up your statements within the paper. You will need to address each of the following as they relate to your two leaders. Each question is worth equal value. 12/13/2020 Module 8: Portfolio Project https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/36189/assignments/717779?module_item_id=1688449 3/7 Instructions: A brief background for each leader including a profile of the leader, the organization they work for, the country or culture in which they work, the industry in which they work, their leadership level within the organization (lower level, middle level, executive level), and any other relevant information An overview of the culture in which the leader holds a position of leadership A comparison of the techniques used by each leader to gain power in his or her role within the organization A comparison of how subordinates relate to each leader, including how much influence the subordinates have on each leader in his or her respective culture An analysis of how each leader uses influence to change the behavior of other leaders, coworkers, and subordinates based on his or her respective culture A comparison of the techniques used by each leader to influence employee motivation An analysis of self-destructive tendencies (dark characteristics) of each leader, and how these tendencies affect the leadership effectiveness An analysis of which leadership theory best describes each leader and the reasons why you selected the leadership theory based on research An evaluation of how successful the two leaders are in their respective cultures and ideas for how they could improve their effectiveness given the culture in which they are leaders Requirements: Your presentation should be either a 5- to 8-minute video or 10-12 narrated slides with images and detailed speaker notes (between 75 to 100 words per slide), not counting the title and reference page slides, which you must include in both the video and slide presentation. You may use your smartphone, webcam, or other video recording device, PowerPoint or an internet-based program such as Prezi or Slide Rocket. Be sure to include the URL of your presentation when using internet-based tools. Paste the URL into a Word document and upload it with your presentation. You may also record your audio/video presentation using the Canvas tools. You must back up your analysis with at least six references not used as required or recommended readings in this course. The CSU Global Library is a good place to find these sources. You may also use additional credible sources including newspapers, trade journals, government reports, and white papers. You may not use Wikipedia in any CSU Global course. You may use course required or recommended readings as additional sources over the required six references. Conform to APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (http://csuglobal.libguides.com/apacitations) . See the Example PPT Presentation (http://csuglobal.libguides.com/CommonWritingAssign/vispresent) in the Online Research and Writing Lab for information on presentation development. 12/13/2020 Module 8: Portfolio Project https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/36189/assignments/717779?module_item_id=1688449 4/7 ORG515 Mod 8 PP Review the Portfolio Project Rubric for more information on how you will be graded on this assignment. Reach out to your instructor with any questions. 12/13/2020 Module 8: Portfolio Project https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/36189/assignments/717779?module_item_id=1688449 5/7 Criteria Ratings Pts 50.0 pts 50.0 pts 30.0 pts Content 50.0 to >40.0 pts Meets Expectation The paper or PowerPoint contains a strong comparison and contrast of two leaders regarding their leader characteristics, use of power and influence, and how these relate to their effectiveness or lack of effectiveness within their respective organizations. 40.0 to >30.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge of the selected topic and conclusion; correctly represents knowledge from four references. 30.0 to >20.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge and conclusion; correctly represents knowledge from three references. 20.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and makes a weak or absent conclusion; correctly represents knowledge from one to two references or uses no references as justification. Requirements 50.0 to >40.0 pts Meets Expectation The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment; length of paper (8-10 pages) or number of slides (10-12 slides and speaker’s notes). 40.0 to >30.0 pts Approaches Expectation The Portfolio is missing one requirement, as specified in the assignment; length of paper (8- 10 pages) or number of slides (8-10 slides and speaker’s notes). 30.0 to >20.0 pts Below Expectation The Portfolio is missing two requirements, as specified in the assignment; length of paper (8- 10 pages) or number of slides (8-10 slides and speaker’s notes). 20.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence The Portfolio is missing three or more requirements as specified in the assignment; length of paper (8-10 pages) or number of slides (8-10 slides and speaker’s notes). Synthesis and Evaluation 30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts regarding evidence-based interventions or prevention programs. 24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation regarding evidence-based interventions or prevention programs. 18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation regarding evidence-based interventions or prevention programs. 12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation regarding evidencebased interventions or prevention programs. 12/13/2020 Module 8: Portfolio Project https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/36189/assignments/717779?module_item_id=1688449 6/7 Criteria Ratings Pts 30.0 pts 25.0 pts 20.0 pts 20.0 pts Analysis 30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications regarding leadership techniques. 24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis. 18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis. 12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis. Sources 25.0 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectation Cites and integrates at least four credible sources. 20.0 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectation Cites and integrates three credible sources. 15.0 to >10.0 pts Below Expectation Cites and integrates one to two credible sources. 10.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Cites and integrates no credible sources. Application of Source Material 20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material. 16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources. 12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Major problems with selection and linkage of sources. 8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the O course. rganization 20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements. 16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements. 12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements. 8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements. 12/13/2020 Module 8: Portfolio Project https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/36189/assignments/717779?module_item_id=1688449 7/7 Total Points: 275.0 Criteria Ratings Pts 20.0 pts 30.0 pts Grammar and Style 20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments. 16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing. 12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations. 8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes Demons with clarity. trates proper use of APA style 30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error. 24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors. 18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors. 12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.