What would Nietzsche say about Marx's critical project?

Assignment
Name
Institution
Course
Professor
Date
What would Nietzsche say about Marx's critical project?
Morality is a topic that excites a great debate globally because different people interpret it differently. Philosophers have had their arguments on what is moral and how the laws of nature should apply in the contemporary concerning morality. Friedrich Nietzsche and Karl Max are among the most significant philosophers who advanced interesting and contrasting arguments about morality. Nietzsche stood for passion while Max championed for a reason. This work describes how Marx and Engels criticize the bourgeois belief that morality is based on "eternal laws of nature and reason," Nietzsche's view that science is not opposed to morality but rather represents its own self-overcoming and the implications of Nietzsche's views for Marx's critical project. It will also discuss what Nietzsche would say about Marx's prediction of an inevitable proletarian revolution, giving what Nietzsche would propose instead.
How Marx and Engels criticize the bourgeois belief that morality is based on "eternal laws of nature and reason
Max and Engel believed in a free world where people have the freedom to do what they want without discrimination brought by the status of people. As much as certain aspects define morality, Max and Engels would not include eternal laws of nature and reason in the list (Marx & Engels, 2009). The rich people pursue their development as an end means and seek new ways of expressing themselves with the natural and social world. For rich people, their own realization exists as an inner need. Max criticized the capitalist method of production, saying it brings division among the people in their social-economic status. He believed that capitalism ties the society to bourgeois rules of political and economic status, which divides the community into those who have more and those who do not own anything. Max and Engels believed that people communism would liberate people from material captivity brought by capitalism's production method.
Max believed that the deplorable state that people live in should only be blamed on the individuals and no other factors because people bring such problems on themselves. It would be wise for them to practice self-control, and they would not be in that sorry state. This state has permitted the bourgeois to exercise control over the poor. Max and Engels condemn this and any other thing that exonerates capitalism (Marx & Engels, 2009).
Labor is a form of slavery, according to Marx. He writes that workers congest in the factory and under an extended hierarchy of commands. The bourgeois, as well as machines, have enslaved the workers. This despotic regime, according to Marx, further brings division in society instead of uniting people. Marx believes that a class should have the ability to sustain life if it is to be considered rulers or leaders (Marx & Engels, 2009). The bourgeois does not qualify because they cannot guarantee the safety of their slaves. Therefore, Marx and Engels would believe that there is nothing morally wrong or right. Instead, situations and scenarios are only historically and economically determined. Communism is the only way to bring sobriety by abolishing the privatization of property.
Nietzsche's view that science is not opposed to morality
Friedrich Nietzsche described two types of morality; master morality and slave in his book Genealogy of Morals. Master morality evaluates actions as bad or good, while slave morality bases its judgment on a scale of bad or good. The book contains three essays; essay one concentrates on the master and slave morality. Nietzsche criticizes the ideology that everything bad is harmful, while everything good is helpful. Master morality is for the strong-willed men. For them, the good is powerful, noble, and healthy, while the bad is the timid, weak, petty, and cowardly.
Nietzsche says that the essence of the master morality is nobility, open-mindedness, trustworthiness, truthfulness, and self-worth. The idea of bad develops from the nobleman as the opposite of the master morality (Nietzsche & Hollingdale, 1989). Nietzsche also asserts that the nobleman is a value creator and does not need approval. In this type of morality, something ...