Paper to Cinema: From In the Grove to Rashomon
Paper+Presentation Guidelines
Length: 6-8 pages (excluding Works Cited)
Objective: Comparative textual analysis, plus a consideration for comparability/the ethics of comparison. Engage in a comparison that enables a new understanding of (at least) one of the texts we have read. Enrich or otherwise nuance your comparison by arguing for how it benefits a global community of readers (in the spirit of Zhang Longxi’s “Distant Killing”). Make us smarter about at least one of the texts we’ve read and explain the greater benefit of your act of comparison.
Example: How does a comparison of the contemporary Tale of Genji manga with the original Tale of Genji make us aware of aspects of the original Genji that we didn’t see before? What makes the comparison of a “classic novel” to contemporary manga appropriate? Does it affect our definition of storytelling, or of “literature”?
Assessment: I will use the same 50-point grading rubric that I used with Paper 1, but add a category of extra credit for papers that productively respond to class feedback.
Citation: Use of outside sources will be essential. When employing ideas taken from other sources, you must add in-line citations or footnotes.
Use of generative AI remains the same as before. Two-sentence maximum unit for proofreading purposes, show all usage.
“Thesis paragraph” due by email: Tell me the texts you wish to compare, explain why you chose them, and offer a hypothesis regarding what you find.
Presentation phase: Once all proposals have been received, I will divide us into “panels” to present during the last three sessions of the course (12/5, 12/7, 12/12). Everyone will present their work and field questions from the audience about their ideas. The paper itself does not need to be done at that point. You may use slides but you are not required to do so.
Papers due the night of the final exam date. There will not be enough time for rewrites.
Paper to Cinema: From in The Grove to Rashomon
Students Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Code and Name
Instructors Name
Date
Paper to Cinema: From in The Grove to Rashomon
Akutagawa Ryunosuke's short story "In a Grove" and Akira Kurosawa's film adaptation "Rashomon" both center on the mystery death of young samurai Kanazawa no Takehiro, whose body has been found in a bamboo forest near Kyoto. Through comparative analysis of the two, we are offered a rich exploration into the complexities of narrative structure and the elusive nature of truth, both of which are central to understanding human nature. The unique narrative technique employed in "In a Grove," featuring multiple conflicting first-person accounts, and its cinematic counterpart in "Rashomon," which creatively integrates another of Akutagawa's stories, together highlight the subjective nature of truth and the inherent unreliability of personal perspectives. Therefore, from the perspective of narrative, the comparative analysis will compare and analyze the storyline of the novel and the movie, in order to explore the characteristics of the two throughout the narrative process and the reasons that lead to the uncertainty of the story in the end. This comparison not only deepens our understanding of the two masterpieces but also resonates with a global community of readers and viewers by underscoring the universal theme of the ambiguity of truth. By examining these works side by side, we gain insight into how narrative form shapes our perception of reality, a realization that is increasingly relevant in a world where diverse perspectives and narratives constantly intersect and compete.
In "In a Grove," Akutagawa exhibits a narrative prowess that goes beyond traditional storytelling conventions. The distinctive technique he employs involves presenting the story through a multiple conflicting first-person accounts. This narrative connects the diverse perspectives of each character, transforming the unfolding events surrounding Takehiro's death into a combination of subjective truths. As each character becomes both witness and storyteller, the narrative becomes increasingly complex, challenging investigators and readers alike. The deliberate choice to embrace this storytelling approach serves not only to complicate the investigation into the circumstances of Takehiro's demise but also to confront the very essence of a singular, objective truth. The narrative structure in "In a Grove" emerges as a thematic factor, setting the stage for a major exploration of the human psyche. It lays bare the connection between reality and perception, beckoning the audience to struggle