Linguistic Discrimination and its Relationship to Linguistic Inequality

Linguistic Discrimination and its Relationship to Linguistic Inequality
Student's Name:
Institution:
Professor:
Unit Name & Number:
Date of Submission:
Linguistic Discrimination and its Relationship to Linguistic Inequality
Linguistic discrimination refers to the mistreatment of people because of their choice of language and speech features, such as first language, accent, vocabulary size (if the speaker uses complicated and varied words), modality, and grammar. In France, for instance, an Occitan speaker would almost certainly be handled differently than a native French speaker. An individual can automatically shape assumptions about the next person's income, schooling, socioeconomic class, character, or other traits based on a disparity in language use, leading to discrimination (The LASELC and ACLU Foundation of North California, 2002). Tove et al. (1989) described linguistic discrimination as belief systems used to legitimize, implement, and propagate unequal distributions of wealth and influence (both physical and non-physical entities) among groups identified by language. Legal aid at work (2021) further defined it as when people are treated negatively due to their native language or other aspects of their linguistic skills. Sign language has been primarily discriminated against over time in so many ways.
It has been established that research into sign languages was initially hindered by wide held belief that sign languages were only visual manifestations of verbal languages or primitive communication forms and not standalone languages (Bloomfield, 1933). After Stokoe (1960) demonstrated that signs are made up of sub-lexical components was sign language taken seriously, and its linguistic status appreciated. At some point, the Congress of Milan banned deaf schools throughout Europe on the premise that speech was expressly superior over the signing and that the deaf-mute ought to be restored to society by being subjected to oral language teaching (Ramsammy, 2021).
Linguistic inequality refers to a person's inability to exploit a particular dialect of a speech within a specific context due to a lack of awareness or some other disadvantage (IGI global, 1988). Linguistic inequality can be broken down into communicative inequality, subjective inequality, and strictly linguistic inequality (Hudson, 1996). Subjective inequality is all about what people think of each other's expressions. In certain cultures, people are assigned various intellect, friendliness, and other values based on how they talk. As a result, whatever qualities are highly regarded, some speakers are believed to have more than they do just because they talk in the "right" manner, while others are believed to have less since their expression gives the wrong impression. As a result, in the context of sign language, it leads to inequality because it is used as a criterion for judging individuals, even though it is a highly inaccurate benchmark, much as oral language solely defines the standards (Hudson, 1996).
Conversational or communicative inequality is concerned with comprehension and application of linguistic elements to communicate effectively than with understanding the linguistic elements themselves. For example, when using speech to communicate with others, it refers to the type of experience or ability required, which then becomes a problem as signers are supposed to fit these same standards. It also involves inequalities in how speakers choose variants of linguistic terms to project a positive picture, implying that conversational inequality encompasses subjective inequality. Since it includes gaps at the levels of idealization and culture, communicative disparity affects the relationship between language, society, and perception (Hudson, 1996).
Linguistic disparity or inequality relates to a person's knowledge of linguistic objects. It's hard to argue that the things one knows reflect one's interactions and that individuals with diverse encounters know different sets of items. That is especially evident in vocabulary, where certain people have a large vocabulary for a specific field such as arts or linguistics. In contrast, others have almost no diction for those fields. Disparities can also be seen in other aspects of life. Objects that are recognizable to some are foreign to others, such as familiar words with foreign meanings or spellings and unfamiliar syntactic design. In any scenario, some people are aware of the item while others are unaware. While disparity exists on every occasion, some are more significant than others regarding their impact on general life opportunities (Hudson, 1996). A case in sign language involves oral cues such as laughing. Such oral cues have social meanings to hearing people, who control which sounds are acceptable or what they represent. While signers are accustomed to a language determined by signs, they are, to some extent, disengaged from the larger society.
Linguistic inequality is a causal effect of linguistic discrimination, especially when looking at sign language. It is related to how society judges particular individuals' linguistic skills in terms of dialect, vocabulary, accents, and many other linguistics factors to their social standing, schooling, among others. Iskandarova et al. (2017) explain that language is in a state of perpetual motion. Creation exists not only to transmit ideas but also to organize them and to interpret the nature and significance of the universe in human thought. Also, it has the potential to be a powerful form of oppression.
Sign language users exist within a microcosm of oral language users. Much of their environment is influenced and controlled by oral language speakers. The way one talks or vocalizes anything, such as slurping a drink, chewing loudly, and so on, is merely a reference to standards set by oral language. The oral group can recognize a derogatory social norm X. For instance, all representations of that norm are uncouth. When it comes to a language evaluation, it is found on harsh, high class, masculine, influenced, etc. The language traits of a societal stereotype acquire the stereotype's assessment...