100% (1)
page:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
-1
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 14.4
Topic:

Generativity vs. stagnation and ego-integrity vs. despair

Essay Instructions:

Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English spelling and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) pages in length; refer to the "Assignment Format" page for specific format requirements.



Part A



Compare and contrast Erikson’s generativity versus stagnation stage with his ego-integrity versus despair stage for middle and late adulthood. Include at least three examples from your text as you compare and contrast the two stages.

Write a well thought-out paragraph for each of the following:

• The occurrences that can affect positive or negative outcomes in Erickson’s generativity versus stagnation stage.

• Three proactive changes you can make personally to improve your generativity in your lifetime.



Part B



Describe the physical and cognitive changes that occur in late adulthood, including how some of these changes may lead to decline and eventual death.

Explain how the processes of death and dying can have different outcomes or scenarios depending on choosing different paths. Use at least three examples of supportive evidence from your text.

Write a well thought-out paragraph on each of the following:

• Three proactive ways you personally can improve your physical health

• Three ways you personally can improve your cognitive health in your lifetime



Essay Sample Content Preview:

Lifespan Development
Student’s Name
Institution
Lifespan Development
Introduction
Renowned psychoanalysts, the likes of Sigmund Freud, Eric Erikson, Lawrence Kohlberg, have had varied approaches in understanding human lifespan development. One thing that these psychoanalysts seem to agree unanimously is that the humans’ lifespan comprises stages that are distinguished by age brackets (Feldman, 2017). To put development in the right context, it refers to the various changes, from physical, emotional, and cognitive changes that a person undergoes throughout their lifespan, in essence from infancy, childhood, adolescence, and adulthood (Newman & Newman, 2017). The different psychoanalysts proposed different approaches, and Eric Erikson, a well-known psychoanalyst of the 20th century (Feldman, 2017), employs a paired, eight-staged theoretical approach to expound on psychosocial development, with each stage associated to distinct attributes and age brackets.
Part A
Generativity vs. stagnation and ego-integrity vs. despair
Generativity vs. stagnation (middle adulthood) is a stage where a person actively makes crucial decisions that will affect themselves, the society, close relations, and even future generations either positively or negatively. Ego-integrity vs. despair (late adulthood) is a stage where a person looks back to their course of life, the decision he/she has made over the past, and the consequences either make them proud or are regrettable (Feldman, 2017). As observed from the case study by Fieldman (2017), Geoff and Juan, both in their forties or rather the generativity vs. stagnation stage of life, experience radical changes of their lifetime on matter like marriage, work, parenting, and even caring for others (534).
Early grandparenting also characterizes the generativity vs. stagnation stage. Those who are actively involved in the lives of their grandchildren account for generativity. Those detached from their children or grandchildren represent stagnation. Ego-integrity vs. despair, on the other hand, is characterized by a quite lonely life with little or no interaction with close relations. Elinor, 77, for instance, in the case study by Fieldman (599), leads a very lonely life, with some occasional visits from relatives but still finds it comforting, a typical example of ego-integrity.
It is at the generativity vs. stagnation stage that people either seek job promotions, pay rise, and good working condition or else make drastic decisions to quit or look for greener pastures. Burnout as well, is common in this stage, bearing in mind that care for others intensifies. Ego-integrity vs. despair, however, is characterized by retirement, reduced productivity, and even losses due to deaths and illnesses. Mr. Jim Hardy's case study (Fieldman, 2017, 607) demonstrates the challenges of death and retirement, where his wife dies, and he faces the challenge of having to retire and live by himself.
The two stages are incontestably distinct. However, there are some overlapping characteristics. Grandparenting is mutual with the two. Also, people in middle adulthood are fond of getting anguished by opportunities they never had in their early life, just like those who are in their final stage (Fieldman, 2017). The difference comes when those in middle adulthood still manage to turn things around.
Generativity vs. stagnation comes at a time when one is on the fence between having a stable family and a well-paying career. In this regard, parenting and employment become the primary occurrences that influence this stage. Maximum involvement with the future generation and generally practicing good habits of nurturing is an ingredient for positive outcomes, whereas being detached from the children is a recipe for stagnation (Newton et al., 2020). Likewise, employment influences the life of a middle adult in the sense that generativity is realized by one being able to have a reasonable salary, conducive work environment, and positive self-esteem. Also, the diversity of the nature of work, rampant layoffs, and the imminent readjustments of workplaces to suit customer...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!